30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adverse effects of long-term amiodarone therapy

      editorial
      ,
      The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
      The Korean Association of Internal Medicine

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          See Article on Page 588-596 Amiodarone, first used in Europe for the treatment of angina pectoris in the 1960s, began to be widely utilized as an antiarrhythmic agent in the 1970s. Currently, it is one of the most commonly used antiarrhythmic agents for the treatment of almost all tachyarrhythmias; however, frequent occurrence of adverse effects is an important concern when deciding on its use. In the current issue of The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine [1], type and frequency of adverse effects are reported among a relatively large number of amiodarone treated patients (n = 930) from a single institution. At mean follow-up of 2.7 years, 16.6% of patients experienced amiodarone related adverse effects and 15.1% had to discontinue the drug because of adverse effects. The incidence of adverse effect was reported as high as 70% with 18% to 37% rate of adverse effect driven drug discontinuation at 5 years follow-up. The results of the article in this issue of the journal appear consistent with those in a practical guide published in 2007, with incidence of adverse effects of 15% during first year of amiodarone use increasing to up to 50% during long-term use [2]; there was higher frequency of adverse effects in patients on amiodarone for a long time which was amenable to reversal by dose lowering or drug discontinuation. Rate of drug discontinuation secondary to drug adverse effects in the study in this issue; however, appears lower than the 22.9% rate reported in 1997 in a meta-analysis of low dose (daily average of 152 to 330 mg) amiodarone therapy for at least 1 year [3]. As pointed out by the authors, the study in this issue was retrospective and mild adverse effects might have been missed or not recorded. Pulmonary toxicity is one of the fatal adverse effects of amiodarone with mortality as high as 10% and incidence of approximately 2% in previous studies, even higher among older patients on higher doses [4]. Pulmonary toxicity manifests with dyspnea, cough, fever, and pulmonary lesions usually progress if early detection is not made [5]. For early detection of pulmonary toxicity, pulmonary function tests including diffusion capacity and chest X-ray are recommended every 3 months during the first year and twice yearly thereafter, or if not possible, at least chest X-ray once yearly. In principle, the drug should be discontinued if pulmonary toxicity is detected and corticosteroid used for significant toxicity. Amiodarone is an iodinated derivate of benzofuran similar in structure to the thyroid hormones triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4), and containing a large of amount of iodine; specifically, a 100 mg tablet contains 250 times the daily iodine requirement. Because of the latter features, use of amiodarone may cause thyroid damage and induce hypothyroidism with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) elevation in 2% to 4% of cases or hyperthyroidism with mainly increased T3 level in 1% to 2% of cases [6]. Amiodarone treatment can initially elevate levels of TSH and free and total T4 while decreasing those of total and free T3. After achieving equilibrium at 3 months TSH is normalized while T4 and T3 remain at high and low normal levels, respectively. To detect such changes, thyroid function testing is recommended every 3 months during the first year and once or twice yearly thereafter [2]. Amiodarone can cause bradycardia and conduction disturbance by depression of sinus or atrioventricular node and prolongation of myocardial refractoriness. In the article in this issue, frequency of these adverse effects was approximately 9.6% rendering them the most frequent, in contrast to the 3.3% to 5% reported in the meta-analysis of low dose amiodarone [2]. These adverse effects can occur more frequently if patients are older or have structural heart disease. Amiodarone through a direct drug effect causes prolongation of QT interval in almost all patients. Minimal QT prolongation after amiodarone treatment is not clinically significant, and in previous meta-analysis, low dose amiodarone use was associated with very small risk of severe QT prolongation and torsades de pointes [3]. The most common ocular change after long-term use of amiodarone is corneal epithelial opacities in 70% to 100% patients followed by lens opacities in 50% to 60% of patients. However, these changes do not affect eyesight and therefore drug discontinuation is not warranted. In rare cases of retinopathy or optic neuropathy, lowering dose or discontinuation of amiodarone should be considered [7]. The study in this issue reports a very low frequency of 0.6% of ocular adverse events as compared to previous studies, again likely reflecting capture of serious adverse effects and not minor ones not affecting eyesight. A practical guide does not recommend regular eye examinations in patients without ocular symptoms [2]. Although it was not mentioned in the paper in this issue, amiodarone can cause other adverse effects including asymptomatic elevation of liver enzyme, neurologic dysfunction, photosensitivity, bluish skin discoloration, and gastroenterological disturbance. Further additional examinations are recommended if symptoms suggesting these adverse effects are shown in patients. Routine liver function test on a regular basis (every 6 weeks after amiodarone treatment) is recommended in the practical guide [2]. In Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, 876 patients who had taken amiodarone regularly over 3 months were retrospectively investigated [8]. Overall incidence of adverse effects was 11.0% (69 patients) after an average of 24 months of amiodarone treatment. Hypothyroidism (60 patients, 6.9%) was the most common adverse effect followed by ocular (20 patients, 2.3%), pulmonary (10 patients, 1.1%), and skin adverse effect (six patients, 0.7%). Different incidence of adverse effects between the latter study and that in this issue is probably secondary to different treatment dose and duration. Dronedarone is a new antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Dronedarone exhibits similar pharmacological action to amiodarone but iodine was eliminated to reduce toxicity including pulmonary and thyroid toxicity. In the ATHENA study [9], use of dronedarone in paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation patients with moderate risk of cardiovascular events significantly reduce cardiovascular events including unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The DIONYSOS study [10] compared dronedarone (400 mg twice daily) and amiodarone (600 mg daily for 28 days, and 200 mg daily thereafter) over 6 months in terms of maintenance of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation patients. Recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation were 63% and 42% in the dronedarone and amiodarone groups, respectively, indicating less potency of dronedarone on sinus rhythm maintenance. However, through 7 months follow-up, dronedarone was associated with significantly less side effects and therefore with lower discontinuation rate. Thus, one could argue that dronedarone has a better safety profile even though it has decreased efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation. However, dronedarone increases mortality in heart failure patients with NYHA class III/IV and permanent atrial fibrillation patients. Therefore, it is recommended that dronedarone be avoided in patients with heart failure or permanent atrial fibrillation. Taken altogether, there seems to be small risk of either minor/fatal adverse effects or death with low doses of amiodarone (less than 200 mg per day). However, it is important to keep in mind that long-term treatment of amiodarone is associated with occurrence of adverse effects warranting regular follow-up examinations for their early detection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation.

          Dronedarone is a new antiarrhythmic drug that is being developed for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. We conducted a multicenter trial to evaluate the use of dronedarone in 4628 patients with atrial fibrillation who had additional risk factors for death. Patients were randomly assigned to receive dronedarone, 400 mg twice a day, or placebo. The primary outcome was the first hospitalization due to cardiovascular events or death. Secondary outcomes were death from any cause, death from cardiovascular causes, and hospitalization due to cardiovascular events. The mean follow-up period was 21+/-5 months, with the study drug discontinued prematurely in 696 of the 2301 patients (30.2%) receiving dronedarone and in 716 of the 2327 patients (30.8%) receiving placebo, mostly because of adverse events. The primary outcome occurred in 734 patients (31.9%) in the dronedarone group and in 917 patients (39.4%) in the placebo group, with a hazard ratio for dronedarone of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.84; P<0.001). There were 116 deaths (5.0%) in the dronedarone group and 139 (6.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.08; P=0.18). There were 63 deaths from cardiovascular causes (2.7%) in the dronedarone group and 90 (3.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.98; P=0.03), largely due to a reduction in the rate of death from arrhythmia with dronedarone. The dronedarone group had higher rates of bradycardia, QT-interval prolongation, nausea, diarrhea, rash, and an increased serum creatinine level than the placebo group. Rates of thyroid- and pulmonary-related adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups. Dronedarone reduced the incidence of hospitalization due to cardiovascular events or death in patients with atrial fibrillation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00174785.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A short-term, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the DIONYSOS study.

            We compared the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and dronedarone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Five hundred and four amiodarone-naïve patients were randomized to receive dronedarone 400 mg bid (n = 249) or amiodarone 600 mg qd for 28 days then 200 mg qd (n = 255) for at least 6 months. Primary composite endpoint was recurrence of AF (including unsuccessful electrical cardioversion, no spontaneous conversion and no electrical cardioversion) or premature study discontinuation. Main safety endpoint (MSE) was occurrence of thyroid-, hepatic-, pulmonary-, neurologic-, skin-, eye-, or gastrointestinal-specific events, or premature study drug discontinuation following an adverse event. Median treatment duration was 7 months. The primary composite endpoint was 75.1 and 58.8% with dronedarone and amiodarone, respectively, at 12 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-1.98; P < 0.0001), mainly driven by AF recurrence with dronedarone compared with amiodarone (63.5 vs 42.0%). AF recurrence after successful cardioversion was 36.5 and 24.3% with dronedarone and amiodarone, respectively. Premature drug discontinuation tended to be less frequent with dronedarone (10.4 vs 13.3%). MSE was 39.3 and 44.5% with dronedarone and amiodarone, respectively, at 12 months (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.60-1.07; P = 0.129), and mainly driven by fewer thyroid, neurologic, skin, and ocular events in the dronedarone group. In this short-term study, dronedarone was less effective than amiodarone in decreasing AF recurrence, but had a better safety profile, specifically with regard to thyroid and neurologic events and a lack of interaction with oral anticoagulants.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adverse effects of low dose amiodarone: a meta-analysis.

              We sought to assess the odds of experiencing adverse effects with low dose amiodarone therapy compared with placebo. An estimate of the likelihood of experiencing amiodarone-related adverse effects with exposure to low daily doses of the drug is lacking in the published reports, and little information is available on adverse effect event rates in control groups not receiving the drug. Data from four published trials involving 1,465 patients were included in a meta-analysis design. The criteria for inclusion were 1) double-blind, placebo-controlled design; 2) absence of a crossover design between patient groups; 3) mean follow-up of at least 12 months; 4) maintenance amiodarone dose < or = 400 mg/day; and 5) presence of an explicit description of adverse effects. Data were pooled after testing for homogeneity of treatment effects across trials, and summary odds ratios were calculated by the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method for each adverse effect. The mean amiodarone dose per day ranged from 152 to 330 mg; 738 patients were randomized to receive amiodarone and 727 placebo. Exposure to amiodarone in this dose range, for a minimal duration of 12 months, resulted in odds similar to those of placebo for hepatic and gastrointestinal adverse effects, but in significantly higher odds than those of placebo (p < 0.05) for experiencing thyroid (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 8.7), neurologic (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7), skin (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.2), ocular (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 9.6) and bradycardic (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.3) adverse effects. A trend toward increased odds of pulmonary toxicity was noted (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 5.3), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). The unadjusted total incidence of drug discontinuation was 22.9% in the amiodarone group and 15.4% in the placebo group. The odds of discontinuing the drug in the amiodarone group was approximately 1.5 times that of the placebo group (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.9) (p = 0.003). Compared with placebo, there is a higher likelihood of experiencing several amiodarone-related adverse effects with exposure to low daily doses of the drug. Thus, although low dose amiodarone may be well tolerated, it is not free of adverse effects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Intern Med
                Korean J. Intern. Med
                KJIM
                The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
                The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
                1226-3303
                2005-6648
                September 2014
                28 August 2014
                : 29
                : 5
                : 571-573
                Affiliations
                Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Yoon-Nyun Kim, M.D. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, 56 Dalseong-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-712, Korea. Tel: +82-53-250-7432, Fax: +82-53-250-7034, yoonnyunkim@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.3904/kjim.2014.29.5.571
                4164718
                25228830
                22b69356-ff54-48ac-8d1c-f6ff8e42be43
                Copyright © 2014 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 July 2014
                : 31 July 2014
                Categories
                Editorial

                Internal medicine
                Internal medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article