+1 Recommend
0 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Importance of early ischemic computed tomography changes using ASPECTS in NINDS rtPA Stroke Study.

      Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation

      Aged, Brain Ischemia, diagnosis, pathology, Cerebral Angiography, methods, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Middle Aged, Middle Cerebral Artery, radiography, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Observer Variation, Placebos, Prospective Studies, Recombinant Proteins, therapeutic use, Risk, Stroke, Thrombolytic Therapy, Time Factors, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The importance of early ischemic change (EIC) on baseline computed tomography (CT) in the decision to thrombolyze the patient with acute ischemic stroke has been controversial. ASPECTS is a semiquantitative scale that scores the extent of EIC within the middle cerebral artery territory. We examined whether ASPECTS could be a treatment modifier by systematically reviewing the CT scans in the NINDS rtPA Stroke Study. Six hundred eight of the 624 CT scans were available and of sufficient quality. One of 2 teams (n=3 each) of expert ASPECTS readers evaluated each scan for an ASPECTS value using a consensus score approach. Each team was blind to all clinical information except symptom side and blind to follow-up imaging and outcome information. ASPECTS values were stratified before analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if an ASPECTS by treatment interaction existed on treatment response, outcome, and intracerebral hemorrhage risk. A total of 57.2% (348 of 608) of scans showed EIC with an ASPECTS <10. ASPECTS dichotomized into 8 to 10 and <8 did not have a treatment-modifying effect on good outcome but showed a trend to lower mortality at 90 days with tPA (relative risk 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.06, P=0.10). ASPECTS 8 to 10 were associated with a trend to larger benefit of tPA with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 5 versus ASPECTS 3 to 7 with a NNT of 8. There was no evidence of treatment effect modification by the baseline ASPECTS value in the NINDS rtPA Stroke Study. Therefore, exclusion of patients for thrombolysis within 3 hours of symptom onset based on EIC is not supported by our data. There is a trend to reduced mortality and increased benefit to rtPA if the baseline CT scan is favorable (ASPECTS >7).

          Related collections

          Author and article information



          Comment on this article