70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the past 8 years, both the International Working Group (IWG) and the US National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association have contributed criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that better define clinical phenotypes and integrate biomarkers into the diagnostic process, covering the full staging of the disease. This Position Paper considers the strengths and limitations of the IWG research diagnostic criteria and proposes advances to improve the diagnostic framework. On the basis of these refinements, the diagnosis of AD can be simplified, requiring the presence of an appropriate clinical AD phenotype (typical or atypical) and a pathophysiological biomarker consistent with the presence of Alzheimer's pathology. We propose that downstream topographical biomarkers of the disease, such as volumetric MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose PET, might better serve in the measurement and monitoring of the course of disease. This paper also elaborates on the specific diagnostic criteria for atypical forms of AD, for mixed AD, and for the preclinical states of AD. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Lancet Neurology
          The Lancet Neurology
          Elsevier BV
          14744422
          June 2014
          June 2014
          : 13
          : 6
          : 614-629
          Article
          10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0
          24849862
          22e5dc89-6abe-4e9b-b514-be7caa58ab99
          © 2014

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/


          Comments

          Comment on this article