5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Cerivastatin 0.8 mg in Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p id="d7658779e303"> <i>Background</i>: Statins are the agents of choice in reducing elevated plasma low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C). </p><p id="d7658779e308"> <i>Hypothesis</i>: Cerivastatin 0.8 mg has greater long‐term efficacy in reducing LDL‐C than pravastatin 40 mg in primary hypercholesterolemia. </p><p id="d7658779e313"> <i>Methods</i>: In this double‐blind, parallel‐group, 52‐week study, patients (n = 1,170) were randomized (4:1:1) to cerivastatin 0.8 mg, cerivastatin 0.4 mg, or placebo daily. After 8 weeks, placebo was switched to pravastatin 40 mg. Patients with insufficient LDL‐C lowering after 24 weeks were allowed open‐labeled resin therapy. </p><p id="d7658779e318"> <i>Results</i>: Cerivastatin 0.8 mg reduced LDL‐C versus cerivastatin 0.4 mg (40.8 vs. 33.6%, p&lt;0.0001) or pravastatin 40 mg (31.5%, p&lt;0.0001), and brought 81.8% of all patients, and 54.1% of patients with atherosclerotic disease, to National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg improved mean total C (‐29.0%), triglycerides (‐18.3%), and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) (+9.7%) (all ≤ 0.013 vs. pravastatin 40 mg). Higher baseline triglycerides were associated with greater reductions in triglycerides and elevations in HDL‐C with cerivastatin. Cerivastatin was well tolerated; the most commonly reported adverse events were arthralgia, headache, pharyngitis, and rhinitis. Symptomatic creatine kinase &gt; 10 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) occurred in 1,1.5, and 0% of patients receiving cerivastatin 0.8 mg, cerivastatin 0.4 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg, respectively. Repeat hepatic transaminases &gt;3 × ULN occurred in 0.3–0.5,0.5, and 0% of patients, respectively. </p><p id="d7658779e323"> <i>Conclusion</i>: In long‐term use, cerivastatin 0.8 mg effectively and safely brings the majority of patients to NCEP goal. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cholesterol reduction in cardiovascular disease. Clinical benefits and possible mechanisms.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Influence of pravastatin and plasma lipids on clinical events in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS).

            The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study was a primary prevention trial that demonstrated the effectiveness of pravastatin (40 mg/d) in reducing morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) in moderately hypercholesterolemic men. The present analysis examines the extent to which differences in LDL and other plasma lipids both at baseline and on treatment influenced CHD risk reduction. Relationships between baseline lipid concentrations and incidence of all cardiovascular events and between on-treatment lipid concentrations and risk reduction in patients taking pravastatin were examined by use of Cox regression models and by division of the cohort into quintiles. Variation in plasma lipids at baseline did not influence the relative risk reduction generated by pravastatin therapy. Fall in LDL level in the pravastatin-treated group did not correlate with CHD risk reduction in multivariate regression. Furthermore, maximum benefit of an approximately 45% risk reduction was observed in the middle quintile of LDL reduction (mean 24% fall); further mean decrements in LDL (up to 39%) were not associated with a greater decrease in CHD risk. Comparison of event rates between placebo- and pravastatin-treated subjects with the same LDL cholesterol level provided evidence for an apparent treatment effect that was independent of LDL. We conclude that the treatment effect of 40 mg/d of pravastatin is proportionally the same regardless of baseline lipid phenotype. There is no CHD risk reduction unless LDL levels are reduced, but a fall in the range of 24% is sufficient to produce the full benefit in patients taking this dose of pravastatin. LDL reduction alone does not appear to account entirely for the benefits of pravastatin therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CLC
                Clinical Cardiology
                Clin Cardiol
                Wiley
                01609289
                19328737
                September 2001
                September 2001
                : 24
                : S4
                : 1-9
                Article
                10.1002/clc.4960240902
                6655191
                11594407
                22e8af37-ec41-4c8a-bc46-19e18b04becd
                © 2001

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article