4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Spatial overlaps between the global protected areas network and terrestrial hotspots of evolutionary diversity

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 2
      Global Ecology and Biogeography
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The delayed rise of present-day mammals.

          Did the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event, by eliminating non-avian dinosaurs and most of the existing fauna, trigger the evolutionary radiation of present-day mammals? Here we construct, date and analyse a species-level phylogeny of nearly all extant Mammalia to bring a new perspective to this question. Our analyses of how extant lineages accumulated through time show that net per-lineage diversification rates barely changed across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Instead, these rates spiked significantly with the origins of the currently recognized placental superorders and orders approximately 93 million years ago, before falling and remaining low until accelerating again throughout the Eocene and Oligocene epochs. Our results show that the phylogenetic 'fuses' leading to the explosion of extant placental orders are not only very much longer than suspected previously, but also challenge the hypothesis that the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event had a major, direct influence on the diversification of today's mammals.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth's Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat.

              Biodiversity hotspots have a prominent role in conservation biology, but it remains controversial to what extent different types of hotspot are congruent. Previous studies were unable to provide a general answer because they used a single biodiversity index, were geographically restricted, compared areas of unequal size or did not quantitatively compare hotspot types. Here we use a new global database on the breeding distribution of all known extant bird species to test for congruence across three types of hotspot. We demonstrate that hotspots of species richness, threat and endemism do not show the same geographical distribution. Only 2.5% of hotspot areas are common to all three aspects of diversity, with over 80% of hotspots being idiosyncratic. More generally, there is a surprisingly low overall congruence of biodiversity indices, with any one index explaining less than 24% of variation in the other indices. These results suggest that, even within a single taxonomic class, different mechanisms are responsible for the origin and maintenance of different aspects of diversity. Consequently, the different types of hotspots also vary greatly in their utility as conservation tools.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Ecology and Biogeography
                Global Ecol Biogeogr
                Wiley
                1466-822X
                1466-8238
                February 07 2019
                February 07 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Life Sciences Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi Corpus Christi Texas
                [2 ]Department of Plant and Soil Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
                [3 ]Department of Zoology and Entomology University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
                [4 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson Arizona
                [5 ]Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth Marine Laboratory Plymouth United Kingdom
                [6 ]Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Ø Denmark
                Article
                10.1111/geb.12888
                234fde3a-619a-4dd2-a006-dc75ac78d485
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article