0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Different Neuroendocrine Mechanisms Regulate the Acute Pituitary Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Response to Orchidectomy and Ovariectomy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The following experiments were conducted to determine whether a sex difference exists in neuroendocrine mechanisms controlling acute pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) responses to castration. Adult male rats and 4-day cycling female rats on diestrus 1 were injected intraperitoneally with either phenobarbital sodium (PhB, 80 mg/kg b.w.) or vehicle at 08.00 h. Following a blood collection at 10.00 h, rats given PhB or vehicle were either sham castrated or castrated under ether. Additional blood samples were obtained, and supplemental PhB or vehicle injections were given at 3, 8, 13, 18, and 24 h after castration. Administration of PhB to male rats completely prevented acute increases in plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) and FSH levels after orchidectomy (ORDX). In contrast, PhB treatment did not prevent initial rises in plasma FSH levels at 8 h after ovariectomy (OVX) and only partially suppressed OVX-induced increases in plasma FSH levels between 13 and 24 h. Plasma LH levels were not elevated by 24 h after OVX. In order to specifically evaluate the role of LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) in mediating the PhB-sensitive rises in gonadotropins after castration, groups of male rats and female rats on estrus were injected subcutaneously with 400 µg of a potent LH-RH antagonist (ALHRH) or oil at 12.00 h. At 10.00 h on the next morning, an initial blood sample was taken, and all rats were castrated under ether. Additional blood samples were taken at times indicated in the previous experiment. Similar to PhB, ALHRH completely abolished ORDX-induced increases in circulating LH and FSH levels. In contrast to PhB, ALHRH partially suppressed increases in plasma FSH levels 8 h after OVX. Similar to PhB, however, ALHRH partially suppressed FSH levels between 13 and 24 h. In a final experiment, FSH release was observed to be episodic 20–24 h after either ORDX or OVX, but not 8–12 h after OVX. Taken together, these results clearly demonstrate that acute increases in nonepisodic FSH secretion after ORDX are totally mediated by LHRH. In contrast, acute increases in the nonepisodic component of FSH secretion after OVX are due to both an LHRH-dependent and LHRH-independent mechanism (i.e., increase in basal FSH secretion). Finally, in view of the LHRH-independent control of pulsatile FSH release, the present results suggest that central mechanisms regulating episodic discharges of FSH become activated between 13 and 24 h after OVX.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          NEN
          Neuroendocrinology
          10.1159/issn.0028-3835
          Neuroendocrinology
          S. Karger AG
          0028-3835
          1423-0194
          1986
          1986
          01 April 2008
          : 43
          : 4
          : 511-518
          Affiliations
          Department of Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Tex., USA
          Article
          124575 Neuroendocrinology 1986;43:511–518
          10.1159/000124575
          3092123
          © 1986 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article