20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Vision and Foraging in Cormorants: More like Herons than Hawks?

      research-article
      , , , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Great cormorants ( Phalacrocorax carbo L.) show the highest known foraging yield for a marine predator and they are often perceived to be in conflict with human economic interests. They are generally regarded as visually-guided, pursuit-dive foragers, so it would be expected that cormorants have excellent vision much like aerial predators, such as hawks which detect and pursue prey from a distance. Indeed cormorant eyes appear to show some specific adaptations to the amphibious life style. They are reported to have a highly pliable lens and powerful intraocular muscles which are thought to accommodate for the loss of corneal refractive power that accompanies immersion and ensures a well focussed image on the retina. However, nothing is known of the visual performance of these birds and how this might influence their prey capture technique.

          Methodology/Principal Findings

          We measured the aquatic visual acuity of great cormorants under a range of viewing conditions (illuminance, target contrast, viewing distance) and found it to be unexpectedly poor. Cormorant visual acuity under a range of viewing conditions is in fact comparable to unaided humans under water, and very inferior to that of aerial predators. We present a prey detectability model based upon the known acuity of cormorants at different illuminances, target contrasts and viewing distances. This shows that cormorants are able to detect individual prey only at close range (less than 1 m).

          Conclusions/Significance

          We conclude that cormorants are not the aquatic equivalent of hawks. Their efficient hunting involves the use of specialised foraging techniques which employ brief short-distance pursuit and/or rapid neck extension to capture prey that is visually detected or flushed only at short range. This technique appears to be driven proximately by the cormorant's limited visual capacities, and is analogous to the foraging techniques employed by herons.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Crypsis in the Pelagic Environment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Linking the foraging performance of a marine predator to local prey abundance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cormorants dive through the Polar night.

              Most seabirds are visual hunters and are thus strongly affected by light levels. Dependence on vision should be problematic for species wintering at high latitudes, as they face very low light levels for extended periods during the Polar night. We examined the foraging rhythms of male great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) wintering north of the Polar circle in West Greenland, conducting the first year-round recordings of the diving activity in a seabird wintering at high latitudes. Dive depth data revealed that birds dived every day during the Arctic winter and did not adjust their foraging rhythms to varying day length. Therefore, a significant proportion of the dive bouts were conducted in the dark (less than 1 lux) during the Polar night. Our study underlines the stunning adaptability of great cormorants and raises questions about the capacity of diving birds to use non-visual cues to target fish.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2007
                25 July 2007
                : 2
                : 7
                : e639
                Affiliations
                [1]Centre for Ornithology, School of Biosciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
                Zoological Society of London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.r.martin@ 123456bham.ac.uk

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CW PB GM. Performed the experiments: CW GM ND. Analyzed the data: CW. Wrote the paper: CW PB GM ND.

                Article
                07-PONE-RA-00983R1
                10.1371/journal.pone.0000639
                1919429
                17653266
                236d8800-9b0a-4b71-b510-6868d9d2a379
                White et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 28 March 2007
                : 11 June 2007
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Categories
                Research Article
                Ecology/Behavioral Ecology
                Ecology/Marine and Freshwater Ecology
                Evolutionary Biology/Animal Behavior
                Physiology/Sensory Systems

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article