21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of mycophenolate mofetil on kidney function and phosphorylation status of renal proteins in Alport COL4A3-deficient mice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We investigated the effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on kidney function and on protein phosphorylation in a mouse model for the human Alport syndrome.

          Methods

          COL4A3-deficient (COL4A3−/−) mice were randomly allocated to receive a placebo (PLC COL4A3−/−) or MMF treatment (MMF COL4A3−/−). Wild type mice (WT) were used as controls. Changes in serum creatinine, total protein and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its glucuronide metabolite (MPAG), serum protein electrophoresis, urine dipstick chemistry and sediment were measured. Changes in the phosphorylation status of renal proteins and histology were analyzed.

          Results

          MMF influenced kidney function and protein phosphorylation. Serum creatinine and BUN were lower in MMF treated compared to PLC treated COL4A3−/− mice. Serum albumin and alpha-1 globulins were significantly decreased while serum creatinine, alpha-2 globulins, urine dipstick protein, leukocyte esterase, hemoglobin and red blood cells were all increased in both COL4A3−/− groups compared to WT. Differential 2DE-gel analysis identified six phosphorylated kidney protein spots that were significantly altered by MMF.

          Conclusions

          These data suggest that the MMF treatment in this murine model moderately improved kidney function and reversed the phosphorylation status of six renal phosphoprotein spots to that seen in WT mice.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12953-014-0056-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments.

          Motile cells extend a leading edge by assembling a branched network of actin filaments that produces physical force as the polymers grow beneath the plasma membrane. A core set of proteins including actin, Arp2/3 complex, profilin, capping protein, and ADF/cofilin can reconstitute the process in vitro, and mathematical models of the constituent reactions predict the rate of motion. Signaling pathways converging on WASp/Scar proteins regulate the activity of Arp2/3 complex, which mediates the initiation of new filaments as branches on preexisting filaments. After a brief spurt of growth, capping protein terminates the elongation of the filaments. After filaments have aged by hydrolysis of their bound ATP and dissociation of the gamma phosphate, ADF/cofilin proteins promote debranching and depolymerization. Profilin catalyzes the exchange of ADP for ATP, refilling the pool of ATP-actin monomers bound to profilin, ready for elongation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology.

            Standardization of renal allograft biopsy interpretation is necessary to guide therapy and to establish an objective end point for clinical trials. This manuscript describes a classification, Banff 97, developed by investigators using the Banff Schema and the Collaborative Clinical Trials in Transplantation (CCTT) modification for diagnosis of renal allograft pathology. Banff 97 grew from an international consensus discussion begun at Banff and continued via the Internet. This schema developed from (a) analysis of data using the Banff classification, (b) publication of and experience with the CCTT modification, (c) international conferences, and (d) data from recent studies on impact of vasculitis on transplant outcome. Semiquantitative lesion scoring continues to focus on tubulitis and arteritis but includes a minimum threshold for interstitial inflammation. Banff 97 defines "types" of acute/active rejection. Type I is tubulointerstitial rejection without arteritis. Type II is vascular rejection with intimal arteritis, and type III is severe rejection with transmural arterial changes. Biopsies with only mild inflammation are graded as "borderline/suspicious for rejection." Chronic/sclerosing allograft changes are graded based on severity of tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Antibody-mediated rejection, hyperacute or accelerated acute in presentation, is also categorized, as are other significant allograft findings. The Banff 97 working classification refines earlier schemas and represents input from two classifications most widely used in clinical rejection trials and in clinical practice worldwide. Major changes include the following: rejection with vasculitis is separated from tubulointerstitial rejection; severe rejection requires transmural changes in arteries; "borderline" rejection can only be interpreted in a clinical context; antibody-mediated rejection is further defined, and lesion scoring focuses on most severely involved structures. Criteria for specimen adequacy have also been modified. Banff 97 represents a significant refinement of allograft assessment, developed via international consensus discussions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients.

              The original protocol of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradient (IPG-Dalt; Gorg et al., Electrophoresis 1988, 9, 531-546) is updated. Merits and limits of different methods for sample solubilization, sample application (by cup-loading or ingel rehydration) with respect to the pH interval used for IPG-isoelectric focusing are critically discussed. Guidelines for running conditions of analytical and micropreparative IPG-Dalt, using wide IPGs up to pH 12 for overview patterns, or narrow IPGs for zoom-in gels for optimum resolution and detection of minor components, are stated. Results with extended separation distances as well as automated procedures are demonstrated, and a comparison between protein detection by silver staining and fluorescent dyes is given. A brief trouble shooting guide is also included.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                darinka.petrova@med.uni-goettingen.de
                f.schultze@med.uni-goettingen.de
                gunnar.brandhorst@me.com
                klaus.luchs@web.de
                christof.lenz@mpibpc.mpg.de
                henning.urlaub@mpi-bpc.mpg.de
                diana.rubel@med.uni-goettingen.de
                gross.oliver@med.uni-goettingen.de
                pwalson1@aol.com
                michael.oellerich@med.uni-goettingen.de
                Journal
                Proteome Sci
                Proteome Sci
                Proteome Science
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-5956
                10 December 2014
                10 December 2014
                2014
                : 12
                : 1
                : 56
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099 Goettingen, Germany
                [ ]Clinics of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
                [ ]Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
                [ ]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
                [ ]Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Group, Goettingen, Germany
                [ ]Clinics of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
                Article
                56
                10.1186/s12953-014-0056-z
                4269973
                25525413
                23baf45b-49ab-43b1-a86b-feb37a4544ce
                © Petrova et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 June 2014
                : 25 November 2014
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Molecular biology
                mycophenolic acid,kidney fibrosis,protein phosphorylation,alport syndrome
                Molecular biology
                mycophenolic acid, kidney fibrosis, protein phosphorylation, alport syndrome

                Comments

                Comment on this article