12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Irf5 deficiency in macrophages promotes beneficial adipose tissue expansion and insulin sensitivity during obesity.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Accumulation of visceral adipose tissue correlates with elevated inflammation and increased risk of metabolic diseases. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that control its pathological expansion. Transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) has been implicated in polarizing macrophages towards an inflammatory phenotype. Here we demonstrate that mice lacking Irf5, when placed on a high-fat diet, show no difference in the growth of their epididymal white adipose tissue (epiWAT) but they show expansion of their subcutaneous white adipose tissue, as compared to wild-type (WT) mice on the same diet. EpiWAT from Irf5-deficient mice is marked by accumulation of alternatively activated macrophages, higher collagen deposition that restricts adipocyte size, and enhanced insulin sensitivity compared to epiWAT from WT mice. In obese individuals, IRF5 expression is negatively associated with insulin sensitivity and collagen deposition in visceral adipose tissue. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in adipose tissue macrophages highlights the transforming growth factor β1 (TGFB1) gene itself as a direct target of IRF5-mediated inhibition. This study uncovers a new function for IRF5 in controlling the relative mass of different adipose tissue depots and thus insulin sensitivity in obesity, and it suggests that inhibition of IRF5 may promote a healthy metabolic state during this condition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Macrophage-specific PPARgamma controls alternative activation and improves insulin resistance.

          Obesity and insulin resistance, the cardinal features of metabolic syndrome, are closely associated with a state of low-grade inflammation. In adipose tissue chronic overnutrition leads to macrophage infiltration, resulting in local inflammation that potentiates insulin resistance. For instance, transgenic expression of Mcp1 (also known as chemokine ligand 2, Ccl2) in adipose tissue increases macrophage infiltration, inflammation and insulin resistance. Conversely, disruption of Mcp1 or its receptor Ccr2 impairs migration of macrophages into adipose tissue, thereby lowering adipose tissue inflammation and improving insulin sensitivity. These findings together suggest a correlation between macrophage content in adipose tissue and insulin resistance. However, resident macrophages in tissues display tremendous heterogeneity in their activities and functions, primarily reflecting their local metabolic and immune microenvironment. While Mcp1 directs recruitment of pro-inflammatory classically activated macrophages to sites of tissue damage, resident macrophages, such as those present in the adipose tissue of lean mice, display the alternatively activated phenotype. Despite their higher capacity to repair tissue, the precise role of alternatively activated macrophages in obesity-induced insulin resistance remains unknown. Using mice with macrophage-specific deletion of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma), we show here that PPARgamma is required for maturation of alternatively activated macrophages. Disruption of PPARgamma in myeloid cells impairs alternative macrophage activation, and predisposes these animals to development of diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance, and glucose intolerance. Furthermore, gene expression profiling revealed that downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation gene expression in skeletal muscle and liver leads to decreased insulin sensitivity in these tissues. Together, our findings suggest that resident alternatively activated macrophages have a beneficial role in regulating nutrient homeostasis and suggest that macrophage polarization towards the alternative state might be a useful strategy for treating type 2 diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Macrophages: master regulators of inflammation and fibrosis.

            Macrophages are found in close proximity with collagen-producing myofibroblasts and indisputably play a key role in fibrosis. They produce profibrotic mediators that directly activate fibroblasts, including transforming growth factor-beta1 and platelet-derived growth factor, and control extracellular matrix turnover by regulating the balance of various matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases. Macrophages also regulate fibrogenesis by secreting chemokines that recruit fibroblasts and other inflammatory cells. With their potential to act in both a pro- and antifibrotic capacity, as well as their ability to regulate the activation of resident and recruited myofibroblasts, macrophages and the factors they express are integrated into all stages of the fibrotic process. These various, and sometimes opposing, functions may be performed by distinct macrophage subpopulations, the identification of which is a growing focus of fibrosis research. Although collagen-secreting myofibroblasts once were thought of as the master "producers" of fibrosis, this review will illustrate how macrophages function as the master "regulators" of fibrosis. Copyright Thieme Medical Publishers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses.

              Polymorphisms in the gene encoding the transcription factor IRF5 that lead to higher mRNA expression are associated with many autoimmune diseases. Here we show that IRF5 expression in macrophages was reversibly induced by inflammatory stimuli and contributed to the plasticity of macrophage polarization. High expression of IRF5 was characteristic of M1 macrophages, in which it directly activated transcription of the genes encoding interleukin 12 subunit p40 (IL-12p40), IL-12p35 and IL-23p19 and repressed the gene encoding IL-10. Consequently, those macrophages set up the environment for a potent T helper type 1 (T(H)1)-T(H)17 response. Global gene expression analysis demonstrated that exogenous IRF5 upregulated or downregulated expression of established phenotypic markers of M1 or M2 macrophages, respectively. Our data suggest a critical role for IRF5 in M1 macrophage polarization and define a previously unknown function for IRF5 as a transcriptional repressor.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat. Med.
                Nature medicine
                1546-170X
                1078-8956
                Jun 2015
                : 21
                : 6
                Affiliations
                [1 ] 1] Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie; INSERM UMR_S 1166-ICAN, Nutriomics, Paris, France. [2] Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
                [2 ] 1] Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie; INSERM UMR_S 1166-ICAN, Nutriomics, Paris, France. [2] Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France. [3] Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie, INSERM, UMR_S 1138 Cordeliers Research Center, Paris, France.
                [3 ] 1] Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France. [2] Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie, INSERM, UMR_S 1138 Cordeliers Research Center, Paris, France.
                [4 ] Kennedy Institute Trust of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
                [5 ] 1] INSERM, University of Toulouse, Paul Sabatier University, UMR 1048, Toulouse, France. [2] Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Toulouse University Hospitals, Toulouse, France. [3] Department of Nutrition, Toulouse University Hospitals, Toulouse, France.
                [6 ] Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative, CNRS UMR 8251, Paris, France.
                [7 ] Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
                [8 ] 1] Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Toulouse University Hospitals, Toulouse, France. [2] Department of Nutrition, Toulouse University Hospitals, Toulouse, France.
                [9 ] 1] Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie; INSERM UMR_S 1166-ICAN, Nutriomics, Paris, France. [2] Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France. [3] Heart and Metabolism Division, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
                [10 ] 1] Department of Sports Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. [2] Franco-Czech Laboratory for Clinical Research on Obesity, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
                [11 ] Visceral Surgery Division, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
                [12 ] 1] Heart and Metabolism Division, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. [2] Department of Sports Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
                Article
                nm.3829
                10.1038/nm.3829
                25939064
                247f95b1-32af-48b8-80f7-7bad96078e34
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article