11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Anticoagulant or antiplatelet use and severe COVID-19 disease: A propensity score-matched territory-wide study

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: We read the recent publication in Pharmacological Research on the impact of pre-admission antithrombotic therapy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with great interest [1]. A recent retrospective cohort study demonstrated that the use of heparin improved the 28-day mortality of severe COVID-19 patients at risk of sepsis-induced coagulopathy. [2] Another study found that patients who received treatment-dose anticoagulants were more likely to require invasive mechanical ventilation [3]. However, few population-based studies have examined the effects of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy on the risk of severe COVID-19. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate whether anticoagulant and anti-platelet use is associated with a lower risk of severe COVID-19 infection through a territory-wide, propensity score-matched cohort study. Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster. The inclusion criteria were patients who tested positive for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 under reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between January 1st to August 22nd, 2020 in Hong Kong. The patient data were extracted from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), a Hong Kong-wide electronic health record database that compiles data from all public hospitals to establish a comprehensive and accessible medical record for each patient, and has been used by our team and other groups to conduct population-based studies in the past [4]. The following information was extracted from CDARS: (1) demographics; (2) prior comorbidities; (3) hospitalization characteristics before the COVID-19 related admission; (4) medications prescribed; (5) laboratory tests (complete blood count, biochemical tests, cardiac function tests, C-reactive protein, and arterial blood gas); (6) the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and intubation. The codes from the International Classification of Disease-Ninth Edition (ICD-9) documenting the comorbidities and intubation procedure are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Patient mortality was extracted from the Hong Kong Death Registry, a governmental registry compiling the registered death records of Hong Kong citizens. The primary outcome is the need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), intubation, or death followed-up until September 8th, 2020. Detailed information on the statistical analyses is shown in the Supplementary Appendix. The procedures of data processing are detailed in Fig. 1. The present study consists of 4445 consecutive patients who have been tested positive for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (median age 44.8 years old, 95% CI: [28.9, 60.8]; 50% male). Of these, 212 met the primary outcome (Supplementary Table 3). The baseline clinical characteristics of the cohort stratified by anticoagulant or antiplatelet use before and after propensity score matching for baseline demographics, past medical comorbidities (including the Charlson Comorbidity Index score), medication history, platelet and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (INR) are shown in Supplementary Table 4. The percentage of COVID-19 patients meeting the primary outcome was significantly higher in anticoagulants users compared to non-users, both before (n = 145/292, 41.7% vs. n = 67/4097, 1.6%; P < 0.0001) and after propensity score matching (n = 145/292, 41.7% vs. n = 46/696, 6.6%; P < 0.0001). Similarly, antiplatelet users also showed a higher percentage compared to non-users before (n = 70/292, 24.0% vs. n = 142/4153, 3.4%; P < 0.0001) and after matching (n = 70/292, 24.0% vs. n = 91/584, 15.6%; P < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by anticoagulants or antiplatelets use for the unmatched and matched cohorts are shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, respectively. Based on the propensity score-matched cohort, univariable Cox regression showed that the use of anticoagulants (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [3.36, 6.43], P < 0.0001) or antiplatelets (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: [1.13, 2.10], P = 0.0061) was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome (Supplementary Table 5). For anticoagulant/antiplatelet users vs. non-users, the HR was 5.19 (95% CI: [3.89–6.90] P < 0.0001). Regarding individual drug classes, the use of dabigatran, enoxaparin, clopidogrel or aspirin was a significant predictor. Multivariate Cox analyses showed that anticoagulant/antiplatelet use remained a significant predictor after adjusting for age, past comorbidities and/or medication classes (Supplementary Table 6). Fig. 1 Procedures of data processing. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier curve for the severe disease outcome in PCR-positive COVID-19 patients stratified by anticoagulant (AC)/ antiplatelet (AP) use after 1:2 propensity score matching. Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Kaplan-Meier curve for the severe disease outcome in PCR-positive COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral or steroid therapy, stratified by anticoagulant (AC)/ antiplatelet (AP) use after 1:2 propensity score matching. Fig. 3 As the inclusion of PCR-positive asymptomatic cases may introduce bias. Subgroup analysis including only COVID-19 patients receiving anti-viral or steroid therapy (lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, interferon beta-1b, hydroxychloroquine, steroids) was performed. This subgroup cohort consists of 1064 patients, in whom 82 (7.7%) met the primary outcome (Supplementary Table 7). Their unmatched and matched baseline characteristics are shown in Supplementary Table 8. After propensity score matching, univariate Cox regression showed that the use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants was a significant predictor of severe disease (HR: 8.88, 95% CI: [5.11, 15.43]; P < 0.0001; Supplementary Table 9). Regarding individual drug classes, only the use of edoxaban or enoxaparin was a significant predictor. The relationship between anticoagulant/antiplatelet use remained significant in multivariate Cox analyses adjusting for age, past comorbidities and/or medication classes (Supplementary Table 10). Finally, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between anticoagulant and antiplatelet users receiving antiviral/steroid therapy (n = 63 for each group, 28 patients prescribing both anticoagulants and antiplatelets were excluded; Supplementary Table 11). Univariate Cox regression showed that the use of antiplatelets was associated with a lower risk of severe disease compared to anticoagulant users (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: [0.07, 0.44]; P < 0.0001; Supplementary Table 12). The lower risk observed for antiplatelet users remained significant in multivariate Cox analyses adjusting for age, past comorbidities and/or medication classes (Supplementary Table 13). COVID-19 has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. It particularly affects patients with existing comorbidities more severely [5], [6], [7], complicated by important effects of individual drug classes [8], [9], [10] or drug-drug interactions [11]. Our data indicate that the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets is associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease after propensity score matching in a Chinese cohort. However, antiplatelet use was associated with lower risk of severe disease compared to anticoagulant use. Our findings should be validated in future studies. Funding This study was supported by the 10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Grant Nos. 72042018, 71972164 and 71672163, in part by the 10.13039/501100005847 Health and Medical Research Fund Grant (HMRF), the 10.13039/501100005407 Food and Health Bureau , The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region No. 16171991, and in part by The Theme‐Based Research Scheme of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Grant No. T32‐102/14N. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no potential or actual conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy

          Background A relatively high mortality of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is worrying, and the application of heparin in COVID‐19 has been recommended by some expert consensus because of the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation and venous thromboembolism. However, its efficacy remains to be validated. Methods Coagulation results, medications, and outcomes of consecutive patients being classified as having severe COVID‐19 in Tongji hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The 28‐day mortality between heparin users and nonusers were compared, as was a different risk of coagulopathy, which was stratified by the sepsis‐induced coagulopathy (SIC) score or D‐dimer result. Results There were 449 patients with severe COVID‐19 enrolled into the study, 99 of them received heparin (mainly with low molecular weight heparin) for 7 days or longer. D‐dimer, prothrombin time, and age were positively, and platelet count was negatively, correlated with 28‐day mortality in multivariate analysis. No difference in 28‐day mortality was found between heparin users and nonusers (30.3% vs 29.7%, P  = .910). But the 28‐day mortality of heparin users was lower than nonusers in patients with SIC score ≥4 (40.0% vs 64.2%, P  = .029), or D‐dimer >6‐fold of upper limit of normal (32.8% vs 52.4%, P  = .017). Conclusions Anticoagulant therapy mainly with low molecular weight heparin appears to be associated with better prognosis in severe COVID‐19 patients meeting SIC criteria or with markedly elevated D‐dimer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Association of Treatment Dose Anticoagulation with In-Hospital Survival Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of cardiovascular disease and cardiac injury on in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has produced a significant health burden worldwide, especially in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of underlying cardiovascular comorbidities and acute cardiac injury on in-hospital mortality risk. Methods PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for publications that reported the relationship of underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension and myocardial injury with in-hospital fatal outcomes in patients with COVID-19. The ORs were extracted and pooled. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Results A total of 10 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including eight studies for CVD, seven for hypertension and eight for acute cardiac injury. The presence of CVD and hypertension was associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (unadjusted OR 4.85, 95% CI 3.07 to 7.70; I2=29%; unadjusted OR 3.67, 95% CI 2.31 to 5.83; I2=57%, respectively). Acute cardiac injury was also associated with a higher unadjusted odds of 21.15 (95% CI 10.19 to 43.94; I2=71%). Conclusion COVID-19 patients with underlying cardiovascular comorbidities, including CVD and hypertension, may face a greater risk of fatal outcomes. Acute cardiac injury may act as a marker of mortality risk. Given the unadjusted results of our meta-analysis, future research are warranted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pharmacol Res
                Pharmacol Res
                Pharmacological Research
                Elsevier Ltd.
                1043-6618
                1096-1186
                30 January 2021
                30 January 2021
                : 105473
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
                [b ]Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology, Hong Kong, China
                [c ]Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
                [d ]Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
                [e ]Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
                [f ]Emergency Medicine Unit, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
                [g ]Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding authors.
                [1]

                Joint first authors.

                Article
                S1043-6618(21)00057-8 105473
                10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105473
                7846462
                33524539
                24cbde37-6099-4ce0-a938-3a32f3fa7498
                © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 2 December 2020
                : 3 January 2021
                : 24 January 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article