12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Biological, Molecular and Pharmacological Characteristics of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, Convalescent Plasma, and Remdesivir for COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, also known as COVID-19 pandemic has caused a threatening situation worldwide. Since the first detection, in December, 2019, there have been no effective drug therapy options for treating the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, healthcare professionals are using chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, convalescent plasma and some other options of treatments. Therefore, this study aims to compare the biological, molecular, pharmacological, and clinical characteristics of these three treatment modalities for SARS-COV-2 infections, Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine, Convalescent Plasma, and Remdesivir.

          Methods

          A search was conducted in the “Institute of Science Information (ISI)-Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library databases, Scopus, and Google Scholar” for peer reviewed, published studies and clinical trials through July 30, 2020. The search was based on keywords “COVID-19” SARS-COV-2, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, convalescent plasma, remdesivir and treatment modalities.

          Results

          As of July 30, 2020, a total of 36640 relevant documents were published. From them 672 peer reviewed, published articles, and clinical trials were screened. We selected 17 relevant published original articles and clinical trials: 05 for chloroquine and/or hydroxychloroquine with total sample size (n=220), 05 for Remdesivir (n=1,781), and 07 for Convalescent Plasma therapy (n=398), with a combined total sample size (n=2,399). Based on the available data, convalescent plasma therapy showed clinical advantages in SARS-COV-2 patients.

          Conclusions

          All three treatment modalities have both favorable and unfavorable characteristics, but none showed clear evidence of benefit for early outpatient disease or prophylaxis. Based on the current available data, convalescent plasma therapy appears to show clinical advantages for inpatient use. In the future, ongoing large sample size randomized controlled clinical trials may further clarify the comparative efficacy and safety of these three treatment classes, to conclusively determine whom to treat with which drug and when to treat them.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J King Saud Univ Sci
          J King Saud Univ Sci
          Journal of King Saud University. Science
          The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
          1018-3647
          2213-686X
          6 September 2020
          6 September 2020
          Affiliations
          [a ]Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
          [b ]Department of Adult Hematology/BMT, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
          [c ]Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, California, United States of America
          [d ]Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, California, United States of America
          [e ]Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
          [f ]Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
          [g ]University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
          [h ]Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center San Mateo, California, United States of America
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author at: College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.
          Article
          S1018-3647(20)30269-X
          10.1016/j.jksus.2020.09.002
          7474813
          32921965
          24cc992f-ffbf-465e-af3e-ee510ca155ae
          © 2020 The Author(s)

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          : 6 July 2020
          : 16 August 2020
          : 1 September 2020
          Categories
          Article

          covid-19,hydroxychloroquine,chloroquine,remdesivir,convalescent plasma

          Comments

          Comment on this article