6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protocol, rationale and design of SELPHI: a randomised controlled trial assessing whether offering free HIV self-testing kits via the internet increases the rate of HIV diagnosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the UK, an estimated 28% have never tested for HIV and only 27% of those at higher risk test at least every 6 months. HIV self-testing (HIVST), where the person takes their own blood/saliva sample and processes it themselves, offers the opportunity to remove many structural and social barriers to testing. Although several randomised controlled trials are assessing the impact of providing HIVST on rates of HIV testing, none are addressing whether this results in increased rates of HIV diagnoses that link to clinical care. Linking to care is the critical outcome because it is the only way to access antiretroviral treatment (ART). We describe here the design of a large, internet-based randomised controlled trial of HIVST, called SELPHI, which aims to inform this key question.

          Methods/design

          The SELPHI study, which is ongoing is promoted via social networking website and app advertising, and aims to enroll HIV negative men, trans men and trans women, aged over 16 years, who are living in England and Wales. Apart from the physical delivery of the test kits, all trial processes, including recruitment, take place online. In a two-stage randomisation, participants are first randomised (3:2) to receive a free baseline HIVST or no free baseline HIVST. At 3 months, participants allocated to receive a baseline HIVST (and meeting further eligibility criteria) are subsequently randomised (1:1) to receive the offer of regular (every 3 months) free HIVST, with testing reminders, versus no such offer. The primary outcome from both randomisations is a laboratory-confirmed HIV diagnosis, ascertained via linkage to a national HIV surveillance database.

          Discussion

          SELPHI will provide the first reliable evidence on whether offering free HIVST via the internet increases rates of confirmed HIV diagnoses and linkage to clinical care. The two randomisations reflect the dual objectives of detecting prevalent infections (possibly long-standing) and the more rapid diagnosis of incident HIV infections. It is anticipated that the results of SELPHI will inform future access to HIV self-testing provision in the UK.

          Trial registration

          DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN20312003 registered 24/10/2016.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV Infection

          New England Journal of Medicine, 373(9), 795-807
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis

            Abstract Introduction: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a discreet and convenient way to reach people with HIV who do not know their status, including many who may not otherwise test. To inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, we assessed the effect of HIVST on uptake and frequency of testing, as well as identification of HIV-positive persons, linkage to care, social harm, and risk behaviour. Methods: We systematically searched for studies comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing until 1 June 2016. Meta-analyses of studies reporting comparable outcomes were conducted using a random-effects model for relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: After screening 638 citations, we identified five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HIVST to standard HIV testing services among 4,145 total participants from four countries. All offered free oral-fluid rapid tests for HIVST and were among men. Meta-analysis of three RCTs showed HIVST doubled uptake of testing among men (RR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.98). Meta-analysis of two RCTs among men who have sex with men showed frequency of testing nearly doubled (Rate ratio = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.17; 3.01), resulting in two more tests in a 12–15-month period (Mean difference = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.59, 2.66). Meta-analysis of two RCTs showed HIVST also doubled the likelihood of an HIV-positive diagnosis (RR = 2.02; 95% CI: 0.37, 10.76, 5.32). Across all RCTs, there was no indication of harm attributable to HIVST and potential increases in risk-taking behaviour appeared to be minimal. Conclusions: HIVST is associated with increased uptake and frequency of testing in RCTs. Such increases, particularly among those at risk who may not otherwise test, will likely identify more HIV-positive individuals as compared to standard testing services alone. However, further research on how to support linkage to confirmatory testing, prevention, treatment and care services is needed. WHO now recommends HIVST as an additional HIV testing approach.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Attitudes and Acceptability on HIV Self-testing Among Key Populations: A Literature Review

              HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a potential strategy to overcome disparities in access to and uptake of HIV testing, particularly among key populations (KP). A literature review was conducted on the acceptability, values and preferences among KP. Data was analyzed by country income World Bank classification, type of specimen collection, level of support offered and other qualitative aspects. Most studies identified were from high-income countries and among men who have sex with men (MSM) who found HIVST to be acceptable. In general, MSM were interested in HIVST because of its convenient and private nature. However, they had concerns about the lack of counseling, possible user error and accuracy. Data on the values and preferences of other KP groups regarding HIVST is limited. This should be a research priority, as HIVST is likely to become more widely available, including in resource-limited settings. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1097-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.gabriel@ucl.ac.uk
                d.dunn@ucl.ac.uk
                a.speakman@ucl.ac.uk
                leanne.mccabe@ucl.ac.uk
                denise.ward@ucl.ac.uk
                Charles.witzel@lhstm.ac.uk
                justin.harbottle@tht.org.uk
                simon.collins@i-base.org.uk
                mitzy.gafos@lhstm.ac.uk
                f.burns@ucl.ac.uk
                f.lampe@ucl.ac.uk
                peter.weatherburn@lhstm.ac.uk
                andrew.phillips@ucl.ac.uk
                s.mccormack@ucl.ac.uk
                alison.rodger@ucl.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Infect Dis
                BMC Infect. Dis
                BMC Infectious Diseases
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2334
                23 October 2018
                23 October 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 531
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0606 323X, GRID grid.415052.7, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, ; London, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Centre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation, Institute for Global Health, UCL, ; London, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, GRID grid.8991.9, Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, Sigma Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, ; London, UK
                [4 ]Terrence Higgins Trust, London, UK
                [5 ]HIV i-Base, London, UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, GRID grid.8991.9, Department of Global Health and Development, , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, ; London, UK
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0439 3380, GRID grid.437485.9, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, ; London, UK
                [8 ]ISNI 0000000122478951, GRID grid.14105.31, Trial Sponsor – University College London via MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, ; 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3766-2046
                Article
                3433
                10.1186/s12879-018-3433-x
                6199717
                30352556
                24f10b6b-f8b1-4888-bf8f-78eb09e9d478
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 24 January 2018
                : 4 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007602, Programme Grants for Applied Research;
                Award ID: RP-PG-1212-20006
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                hiv,self-testing,hivst,msm,diagnosis,prevalent,incident
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                hiv, self-testing, hivst, msm, diagnosis, prevalent, incident

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content15

                Cited by11

                Most referenced authors249