11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Drug Design, Development and Therapy (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on the design and development of drugs, as well as the clinical outcomes, patient safety, and programs targeted at the effective and safe use of medicines. Sign up for email alerts here.

      88,007 Monthly downloads/views I 4.319 Impact Factor I 6.6 CiteScore I 1.12 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.784 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

       

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The efficacy of ampicillin and Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus in the active management of preterm premature rupture of membranes remote from term

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We aimed to investigate the treatment efficacy of ampicillin prophylaxis accompanied by Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus over the latency period following preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).

          Methods

          Records of 40 patients who presented with PPROM between 23 0/7–31 6/7 weeks were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=20), treated with ampicillin; and group 2 (n=20), treated with ampicillin plus L. casei rhamnosus. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared. Delta (Δ) values of each laboratory parameter were calculated by subtracting the value at delivery from the values at admission to the clinic.

          Results

          Gestational weeks at delivery (28.1±0.3 weeks versus 31.5±0.4 weeks), latency periods (12.3±1.5 days versus 41.4±4.4 days), 5-minute APGAR scores (6.8±0.1 versus 7.8±0.1), and birth weights (1,320±98 g versus 1,947±128 g) were significantly higher in group 2. White blood cell (WBC) (12,820±353/mm 3 versus 11,107±298/mm 3), and neutrophil counts (10.7±0.5×10 3/L versus 8.2±0.5×10 3/L) were significantly lower in group 2 at delivery. The ΔWBC (2,295±74/mm 3 versus −798±−406/mm 3), ΔC-reactive protein (5±0.04 mg/L versus 1.6±0.2 mg/L), and Δneutrophil (3±0.2×10 3/L versus 0.2±−0.1×10 3/L) were significantly lower in group 2.

          Conclusion

          It seems that addition of L. casei rhamnosus to ampicillin prolongs the latency period in patients with PPROM remote from term.

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A review of premature birth and subclinical infection.

          Premature birth causes high rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality. There are multiple causes of preterm birth. This article reviews the evidence linking subclinical infection and premature birth. Although maternal genital tract colonization with specific organisms has been inconsistently associated with preterm birth and/or premature rupture of membranes, some infections have been consistently associated with preterm delivery. The association of histologic chorioamnionitis with prematurity is a consistent finding, but the mechanisms require further study. The relationship between histologic chorioamnionitis infection and the chorioamnionitis of prematurity requires additional research. A varying number of patients in "idiopathic" preterm labor have positive amniotic fluid cultures (0% to 30%), but it is not clear whether infection preceded labor or occurred as a result of labor. Evidence of subclinical infection as a cause of preterm labor is raised by finding elevated maternal serum C-reactive protein and abnormal amniotic fluid organic acid levels in some patients in preterm labor. Biochemical mechanisms for preterm labor in the setting of infection are suggested by both in vitro and in vivo studies of prostaglandins and their metabolites, endotoxin and cytokines. Some, but by no means all, antibiotic trials conducted to date have reported decreases in prematurity. These results support the hypothesis that premature birth results in part from infection caused by genital tract bacteria. In the next few years, research efforts must be prioritized to determine the role of infection and the appropriate prevention of this cause of prematurity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preterm premature rupture of the membranes.

            M Mercer (2002)
            Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM) affects over 120,000 pregnancies annually in the United States and is associated with significant maternal, fetal, and neonatal risk. Management of PROM requires an accurate diagnosis as well as evaluation of the risks and benefits of continued pregnancy or expeditious delivery. An understanding of gestational age-dependent neonatal morbidity and mortality is important in determining the potential benefits of conservative management of preterm PROM at any gestation. Where possible, the treatment of pregnancies complicated by PROM remote from term should be directed towards conserving the pregnancy and reducing perinatal morbidity due to prematurity while monitoring closely for evidence of infection, placental abruption, labor, or fetal compromise due to umbilical cord compression. Current evidence suggests aggressive adjunctive antibiotic therapy to reduce gestational age-dependent and infectious infant morbidity. Similarly, review of evaluable data indicates that antenatal corticosteroid administration in this setting enhances neonatal outcome without increasing the risk of perinatal infection. It is not clear that tocolysis in the setting of preterm PROM remote from term reduces infant morbidity. When preterm PROM occurs near term, particularly if fetal pulmonary maturity is evident, the patient is generally best served by expeditious delivery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 80: premature rupture of membranes. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists.

              (2007)
              Preterm delivery occurs in approximately 12% of all births in the United States and is a major factor contributing to perinatal morbidity and mortality (1, 2). Despite extensive research in this area, the rate of preterm birth has increased by 38% since 1981 (3). Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is a complication in approximately one third of preterm births. It typically is associated with brief latency between membrane rupture and delivery, increased potential for perinatal infection, and in utero umbilical cord compression. Because of this, both PROM at and before term can lead to significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. There is some controversy over the optimal approaches to clinical assessment and treatment of women with term and preterm PROM. Management hinges on knowledge of gestational age and evaluation of the relative risks of preterm birth versus intrauterine infection, abruptio placentae, and cord accident that could occur with expectant management. The purpose of this document is to review the current understanding of this condition and to provide management guidelines that have been validated by appropriately conducted outcome-based research. Additional guidelines on the basis of consensus and expert opinion also are presented.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Dove Medical Press
                1177-8881
                2014
                30 August 2014
                : 8
                : 1169-1173
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Firat Medical Center, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
                [2 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Special Medical Park Hospital, Elazig, Turkey
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, Firat Medical Center, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Salih Burcin Kavak, Firat University, School of Medicine, Firat Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 23100, Elazig, Turkey, Tel +90 424 233 35 55 extn 2124, Fax +90 424 237 91 38, Email burcinkavak@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                dddt-8-1169
                10.2147/DDDT.S68552
                4155800
                25210439
                24fc60f8-03e2-4cc2-b253-60334240e2c8
                © 2014 Kavak et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License

                The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                probiotic,antibiotic,latency period
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                probiotic, antibiotic, latency period

                Comments

                Comment on this article