154
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Toward a Better Understanding of the Mindsets of Negotiators : Development and Construct Validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. This article introduces and discusses the 15-item Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM) of negotiators, that is of people involved in joint decision-making processes. The scale is based on the integrative mindset ( Ade, Schuster, Harinck, & Trötschel, 2018 ), which describes a set of three inclinations of parties approaching negotiations: a collaborative, a curious, and a creative one. Using a first sample ( N = 1,030) of online survey participants, we provide evidence for a high psychometric quality of the SIM as suggested by high reliabilities and good fit indices. We also compare the SIM with scales that measure well-known and possibly related psychological constructs and show the SIM’s distinction to them. Using a second sample ( N = 417), we show how the SIM differs from a Scale on Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies (SINS) that has been used in previous negotiation research. The findings of the present studies are discussed with respect to potential applications of the SIM in experimental research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The efficient assessment of need for cognition.

            A short form for assessing individual differences in need for cognition is described.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing."

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                jpa
                European Journal of Psychological Assessment
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1015-5759
                2151-2426
                November 13, 2019
                2020
                : 36
                : 5
                : 740-747
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Research Department, Kalaidos University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland
                [ 2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany
                [ 3 ]Department of Psychology, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Valentin Ade, Research Department, Kalaidos University of Applied Sciences, Jungholzstrasse 43, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland, E-mail valentin.ade@ 123456kalaidos-fh.ch
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5984-9146
                Article
                jpa_36_5_740
                10.1027/1015-5759/a000548
                251f0b5f-24c0-4dce-acb5-23294087bb9d
                Copyright @ 2019
                History
                : June 29, 2018
                : May 14, 2019
                : May 22, 2019
                Categories
                Original Article
                Differential Psychology

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General behavioral science
                scale development,negotiation,integrative mindset,construct validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article