2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Qualitative Study of Emergency Medicine Residents’ Perspectives of Trauma Leadership Development

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Trauma team leadership is a core skill for the practice of emergency medicine (EM). In this study our goal was to explore EM residents’ perception of their trauma leadership skill development through formal and informal processes and to understand factors that may impact the development and implementation of trauma leadership skills.

          Methods

          Using qualitative semi-structured interviews, we explored the leadership experiences of 10 EM residents ranging from second to fourth postgraduate year. Interviews were conducted between July 26–October 31, 2019 and were audio-recorded, transcribed, and de-identified. We analyzed data using qualitative content analysis.

          Results

          Residents discussed three main themes: 1) sources of leadership development; 2) challenges with simultaneously assuming a dual leader-learner role; and 3) contextual factors that impact their ability to assume the leadership role, including the professional hierarchy in the clinical environment, limitations in the physical environment, and gender bias.

          Conclusion

          This study describes the complex factors and experiences that contribute to the development and implementation of trauma team leadership skills in EM residents. This includes three primary sources of leadership development, the dual role of leader and learner, and various contextual factors. Research is needed to understand how these factors and experiences can be leveraged or mitigated to improve resident leadership training outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Basics of Qualitative Research : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory

            The Second Edition of this best-selling textbook continues to offer immensely practical advice and technical expertise that will aid researchers in analyzing and interpreting their collected data, and ultimately build theory from it. The authors provide a step-by-step guide to the research act. Full of definitions and illustrative examples, the book presents criteria for evaluating a study as well as responses to common questions posed by students of qualitative research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?

              Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet little methodological research exists on parameters that influence saturation. Our study compared two approaches to assessing saturation: code saturation and meaning saturation. We examined sample sizes needed to reach saturation in each approach, what saturation meant, and how to assess saturation. Examining 25 in-depth interviews, we found that code saturation was reached at nine interviews, whereby the range of thematic issues was identified. However, 16 to 24 interviews were needed to reach meaning saturation where we developed a richly textured understanding of issues. Thus, code saturation may indicate when researchers have "heard it all," but meaning saturation is needed to "understand it all." We used our results to develop parameters that influence saturation, which may be used to estimate sample sizes for qualitative research proposals or to document in publications the grounds on which saturation was achieved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                West J Emerg Med
                West J Emerg Med
                WestJEM
                Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
                Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
                1936-900X
                1936-9018
                01 January 2024
                20 December 2023
                : 25
                : 1
                : 122-128
                Affiliations
                [* ]University of Florida, Department of Emergency Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
                []University of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington
                []University of Maryland, Department of Psychology, College Park, Maryland
                Author notes
                Address for Correspondence: Rosemarie Fernandez, MD, University of Florida, Department of Emergency Medicine, HMEB 4 th Floor, Rm 413, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0186. Email: fernandez.r@ 123456ufl.edu
                Article
                wjem-25-122
                10.5811/westjem.60098
                10777183
                252ff946-81c6-4121-9b0d-bfdf6f9f9bdc
                © 2024 McFarlane et al.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 08 February 2023
                : 30 August 2023
                : 12 September 2023
                Categories
                Trauma
                Original Research

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article