5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of Mastoid Drilling on Hearing of the Contralateral Normal Ear in Mastoidectomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To evaluate hearing of the contralateral normal ear before and after mastoidectomy in a longitudinal manner and to assess whether the hearing loss is transient or permanent and to find out the duration of temporary hearing loss. This was a clinical longitudinal observational study involving 50 patients with unilateral chronic suppurative otitis media requiring mastoidectomy operation over a period of 18 months after satisfying the inclusion criteria. During the part of the mastoidectomy surgery involving drilling of the mastoid bone, noise levels were recorded at multiple points in the surgery using a digital sound level meter. Postoperatively, beginning from Day 1 to Day 7, PTA and OAE of the contralateral ear were recorded for all patients. The patients were then followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, at which times PTA and OAE were repeated. There is an increase in the absence of High Frequency DPOAEs on the first and second postoperative days, but this increase is higher than that of Low Frequency DPOAEs and gradually returns to normal by 72 h. OAEs were found to be more sensitive at diagnosing and tracking the progress of affected patients. All affected ears only had a temporary postoperative hearing loss, primarily affecting the higher frequencies and returning to normal within 72 h. Drill-generated noise and vibration during mastoidectomy operation is associated with a significant temporary shift in hearing thresholds of the contralateral normal ear in susceptible individuals, affecting the higher frequencies, and is best evaluated using DPOAEs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          latheefnabeel@gmail.com
          Journal
          Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
          Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
          Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
          Springer India (New Delhi )
          2231-3796
          0973-7707
          21 January 2017
          June 2018
          : 70
          : 2
          : 205-210
          Affiliations
          ISNI 0000 0004 1767 8344, GRID grid.416301.1, Department of ENT, , Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, ; Pondy–Cuddalore Main Road, Pillaiyarkuppam, Pondicherry, 607 402 India
          Article
          PMC6015576 PMC6015576 6015576 1064
          10.1007/s12070-017-1064-y
          6015576
          29977842
          25654f10-cf3a-47e5-9aa5-f37a81f05797
          © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2017
          History
          : 8 July 2016
          : 9 January 2017
          Categories
          Original Article
          Custom metadata
          © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018

          Drill-generated noise,Mastoidectomy,Threshold shift,Vibration,Mastoid,DPOAE

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log