16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Bayesian nonparametric approach to marginal structural models for point treatments and a continuous or survival outcome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Marginal structural models (MSMs) are a general class of causal models for specifying the average effect of treatment on an outcome. These models can accommodate discrete or continuous treatments, as well as treatment effect heterogeneity (causal effect modification). The literature on estimation of MSM parameters has been dominated by semiparametric estimation methods, such as inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW). Likelihood-based methods have received little development, probably in part due to the need to integrate out confounders from the likelihood and due to reluctance to make parametric modeling assumptions. In this article we develop a fully Bayesian MSM for continuous and survival outcomes. In particular, we take a Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) approach, using a combination of a dependent Dirichlet process and Gaussian process to model the observed data. The BNP approach, like semiparametric methods such as IPTW, does not require specifying a parametric outcome distribution. Moreover, by using a likelihood-based method, there are potential gains in efficiency over semiparametric methods. An additional advantage of taking a fully Bayesian approach is the ability to account for uncertainty in our (uncheckable) identifying assumption. To this end, we propose informative prior distributions that can be used to capture uncertainty about the identifying “no unmeasured confounders” assumption. Thus, posterior inference about the causal effect parameters can reflect the degree of uncertainty about this assumption. The performance of the methodology is evaluated in several simulation studies. The results show substantial efficiency gains over semiparametric methods, and very little efficiency loss over correctly specified maximum likelihood estimates. The method is also applied to data from a study on neurocognitive performance in HIV-infected women and a study of the comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive drug classes.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biostatistics
          Biostatistics
          biosts
          biosts
          Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
          Oxford University Press
          1465-4644
          1468-4357
          January 2017
          26 June 2016
          : 18
          : 1
          : 32-47
          Affiliations
          Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA jaroy@ 123456upenn.edu
          Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA jaroy@ 123456upenn.edu
          Department of Statistics and Data Science, and Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas, Austin, TX
          Author notes
          * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
          Article
          PMC5255048 PMC5255048 5255048 kxw029
          10.1093/biostatistics/kxw029
          5255048
          27345532
          25680bd1-d432-4e15-98eb-76c1c0f8370d
          © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
          History
          : 29 October 2015
          : 16 March 2016
          : 25 April 2016
          Page count
          Pages: 16
          Categories
          Articles

          Causal inference,Sensitivity analysis,Observational studies,g-Formula,Gaussian process,Dirichlet process

          Comments

          Comment on this article