22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 1: Frequency, syndrome specificity, influence of disease activity, long-term course, association with AQP4-IgG, and origin

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 12 , 13 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 4 , 5 , 1 , 16 , in cooperation with the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS)
      Journal of Neuroinflammation
      BioMed Central
      Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), Devic’s syndrome, Optic neuritis, Transverse Myelitis, Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), Multiple sclerosis, Autoantibodies, Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG), Neuromyelitis optica antibodies (NMO-IgG), Aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG), Cell-based assays, Cerebrospinal fluid, Antibody index

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) have been suggested to play a role in a subset of patients with neuromyelitis optica and related disorders.

          Objective

          To assess (i) the frequency of MOG-IgG in a large and predominantly Caucasian cohort of patients with optic neuritis (ON) and/or myelitis; (ii) the frequency of MOG-IgG among AQP4-IgG-positive patients and vice versa; (iii) the origin and frequency of MOG-IgG in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); (iv) the presence of MOG-IgG at disease onset; and (v) the influence of disease activity and treatment status on MOG-IgG titers.

          Methods

          614 serum samples from patients with ON and/or myelitis and from controls, including 92 follow-up samples from 55 subjects, and 18 CSF samples were tested for MOG-IgG using a live cell-based assay (CBA) employing full-length human MOG-transfected HEK293A cells.

          Results

          MOG-IgG was detected in 95 sera from 50 patients with ON and/or myelitis, including 22/54 (40.7 %) patients with a history of both ON and myelitis, 22/103 (21.4 %) with a history of ON but no myelitis and 6/45 (13.3 %) with a history of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis but no ON, and in 1 control patient with encephalitis and a connective tissue disorder, all of whom were negative for AQP4-IgG. MOG-IgG was absent in 221 further controls, including 83 patients with AQP4-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and 85 with multiple sclerosis (MS). MOG-IgG was found in 12/18 (67 %) CSF samples from MOG-IgG-seropositive patients; the MOG-IgG-specific antibody index was negative in all cases, indicating a predominantly peripheral origin of CSF MOG-IgG. Serum and CSF MOG-IgG belonged to the complement-activating IgG1 subclass. MOG-IgG was present already at disease onset. The antibodies remained detectable in 40/45 (89 %) follow-up samples obtained over a median period of 16.5 months (range 0–123). Serum titers were higher during attacks than during remission ( p < 0.0001), highest during attacks of simultaneous myelitis and ON, lowest during acute isolated ON, and declined following treatment.

          Conclusions

          To date, this is the largest cohort studied for IgG to human full-length MOG by means of an up-to-date CBA. MOG-IgG is present in a substantial subset of patients with ON and/or myelitis, but not in classical MS. Co-existence of MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG is highly uncommon. CSF MOG-IgG is of extrathecal origin. Serum MOG-IgG is present already at disease onset and remains detectable in the long-term course. Serum titers depend on disease activity and treatment status.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients

          Background The diagnostic and pathophysiological relevance of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-Ab) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) has been intensively studied. However, little is known so far about the clinical impact of AQP4-Ab seropositivity. Objective To analyse systematically the clinical and paraclinical features associated with NMO spectrum disorders in Caucasians in a stratified fashion according to the patients' AQP4-Ab serostatus. Methods Retrospective study of 175 Caucasian patients (AQP4-Ab positive in 78.3%). Results Seropositive patients were found to be predominantly female (p 1 myelitis attacks in the first year were identified as possible predictors of a worse outcome. Conclusion This study provides an overview of the clinical and paraclinical features of NMOSD in Caucasians and demonstrates a number of distinct disease characteristics in seropositive and seronegative patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            MOG cell-based assay detects non-MS patients with inflammatory neurologic disease

            Objective: To optimize sensitivity and disease specificity of a myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody assay. Methods: Consecutive sera (n = 1,109) sent for aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody testing were screened for MOG antibodies (Abs) by cell-based assays using either full-length human MOG (FL-MOG) or the short-length form (SL-MOG). The Abs were initially detected by Alexa Fluor goat anti-human IgG (H + L) and subsequently by Alexa Fluor mouse antibodies to human IgG1. Results: When tested at 1:20 dilution, 40/1,109 sera were positive for AQP4-Abs, 21 for SL-MOG, and 180 for FL-MOG. Only one of the 40 AQP4-Ab–positive sera was positive for SL-MOG-Abs, but 10 (25%) were positive for FL-MOG-Abs (p = 0.0069). Of equal concern, 48% (42/88) of sera from controls (patients with epilepsy) were positive by FL-MOG assay. However, using an IgG1-specific secondary antibody, only 65/1,109 (5.8%) sera were positive on FL-MOG, and AQP4-Ab– positive and control sera were negative. IgM reactivity accounted for the remaining anti-human IgG (H + L) positivity toward FL-MOG. The clinical diagnoses were obtained in 33 FL-MOG–positive patients, blinded to the antibody data. IgG1-Abs to FL-MOG were associated with optic neuritis (n = 11), AQP4-seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (n = 4), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 1). All 7 patients with probable multiple sclerosis (MS) were MOG-IgG1 negative. Conclusions: The limited disease specificity of FL-MOG-Abs identified using Alexa Fluor goat anti-human IgG (H + L) is due in part to detection of IgM-Abs. Use of the FL-MOG and restricting to IgG1-Abs substantially improves specificity for non-MS demyelinating diseases. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that the presence of serum IgG1- MOG-Abs in AQP4-Ab–negative patients distinguishes non-MS CNS demyelinating disorders from MS (sensitivity 24%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9%–45%; specificity 100%, 95% CI 88%–100%).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Overlapping demyelinating syndromes and anti–N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.

              To report the clinical, radiological, and immunological association of demyelinating disorders with anti–Nmethyl- D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. Clinical and radiological analysis was done of a cohort of 691 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Determination of antibodies to NMDAR, aquaporin-4 (AQP4), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) was performed using brain immunohistochemistry and cell-based assays. Twenty-three of 691 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had prominent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or clinical features of demyelination. Group 1 included 12 patients in whom anti-NMDAR encephalitis was preceded or followed by independent episodes of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder (5 cases, 4 anti-AQP4 positive) or brainstem or multifocal demyelinating syndromes (7 cases, all anti-MOG positive). Group 2 included 11 patients in whom anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurred simultaneously with MRI and symptoms compatible with demyelination (5 AQ4 positive, 2 MOG positive). Group 3 (136 controls) included 50 randomly selected patients with typical anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 56 with NMO, and 30 with multiple sclerosis; NMDAR antibodies were detected only in the 50 anti-NMDAR patients, MOG antibodies in 3 of 50 anti-NMDAR and 1 of 56 NMO patients, and AQP4 antibodies in 48 of 56 NMO and 1 of 50 anti-NMDAR patients (p<0.0001 for all comparisons with Groups 1 and 2). Most patients improved with immunotherapy, but compared with anti-NMDAR encephalitis the demyelinating episodes required more intensive therapy and resulted in more residual deficits. Only 1 of 23 NMDAR patients with signs of demyelination had ovarian teratoma compared with 18 of 50 anti-NMDAR controls (p50.011). Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis may develop concurrent or separate episodes of demyelinating disorders, and conversely patients with NMO or demyelinating disorders with atypical symptoms (eg, dyskinesias, psychosis) may have anti-NMDAR encephalitis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49-6221-56-4747 , sven.jarius@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                klemens.ruprecht@charite.de
                ingo.kleiter@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
                nadja.borisow@charite.de
                nasgari@health.sdu.dk
                kalliopi.pitarokoili@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
                florence.pache@charite.de
                oliver.stich@uniklinik-freiburg.de
                lena.beume@uniklinik-freiburg.de
                huemmert.martin@mh-hannover.de
                trebst.corinna@mh-hannover.de
                marius.ringelstein@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
                orhan.aktas@uni-duesseldorf.de
                alexander.winkelmann@med.uni-rostock.de
                m.buttmann@ukw.de
                alexander.schwarz@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                hanna.zimmermann@charite.de
                alexander.brandt@charite.de
                diego.franciotta@mondino.it
                sclerosi.multipla@sanluigi.piemonte.it
                joseph.kuchling@charite.de
                juergen.haas@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                m.korporal-kuhnke@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                lillevang@dadlnet.dk
                k.fechner@euroimmun.de
                kathrin.schanda@i-med.ac.at
                friedemann.paul@charite.de
                brigitte.wildemann@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                markus.reindl@i-med.ac.at
                Journal
                J Neuroinflammation
                J Neuroinflammation
                Journal of Neuroinflammation
                BioMed Central (London )
                1742-2094
                26 September 2016
                26 September 2016
                2016
                : 13
                : 279
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Otto Meyerhof Center, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 350, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Neurology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
                [4 ]NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
                [5 ]Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Neurology and Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
                [7 ]Department of Neurology, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany
                [8 ]Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
                [9 ]Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
                [10 ]Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
                [11 ]Department of Neurology, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
                [12 ]IRCCS, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy
                [13 ]Centro di Riferimento Regionale SM, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy
                [14 ]Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
                [15 ]Institute of Experimental Immunology, affiliated to Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany
                [16 ]Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
                Article
                717
                10.1186/s12974-016-0717-1
                5084340
                27788675
                2588a993-facf-4200-82a8-721d3d368cee
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 1 April 2016
                : 9 September 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005941, Dietmar Hopp Stiftung;
                Funded by: Merck Serono
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung;
                Award ID: Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis
                Award ID: Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis
                Award ID: Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft;
                Award ID: DFG EXC 257
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003413, Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft;
                Award ID: Big Wig MS
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: European Research Area-Net
                Award ID: E-RARE-2
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002428, Austrian Science Fund;
                Award ID: FWF project I916
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Neurosciences
                neuromyelitis optica (nmo),devic’s syndrome,optic neuritis,transverse myelitis,longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (letm),neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (nmosd),multiple sclerosis,autoantibodies,myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (mog-igg),neuromyelitis optica antibodies (nmo-igg),aquaporin-4 antibodies (aqp4-igg),cell-based assays,cerebrospinal fluid,antibody index

                Comments

                Comment on this article