43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of the lockdown on the mental health of the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: Results from the COMET collaborative network

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented traumatic event influencing the healthcare, economic, and social welfare systems worldwide. In order to slow the infection rates, lockdown has been implemented almost everywhere. Italy, one of the countries most severely affected, entered the “lockdown” on March 8, 2020.

          Methods

          The COvid Mental hEalth Trial (COMET) network includes 10 Italian university sites and the National Institute of Health. The whole study has three different phases. The first phase includes an online survey conducted between March and May 2020 in the Italian population. Recruitment took place through email invitation letters, social media, mailing lists of universities, national medical associations, and associations of stakeholders (e.g., associations of users/carers). In order to evaluate the impact of lockdown on depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms, multivariate linear regression models were performed, weighted for the propensity score.

          Results

          The final sample consisted of 20,720 participants. Among them, 12.4% of respondents ( N = 2,555) reported severe or extremely severe levels of depressive symptoms, 17.6% ( N = 3,627) of anxiety symptoms and 41.6% ( N = 8,619) reported to feel at least moderately stressed by the situation at the DASS-21.

          According to the multivariate regression models, the depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms significantly worsened from the week April 9–15 to the week April 30 to May 4 ( p < 0.0001). Moreover, female respondents and people with pre-existing mental health problems were at higher risk of developing severe depression and anxiety symptoms ( p < 0.0001).

          Conclusions

          Although physical isolation and lockdown represent essential public health measures for containing the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, they are a serious threat for mental health and well-being of the general population. As an integral part of COVID-19 response, mental health needs should be addressed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

          Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

            Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China

              Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease that was first reported in Wuhan, China, and has subsequently spread worldwide. Risk factors for the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 pneumonia have not yet been well delineated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Psychiatry
                Eur Psychiatry
                EPA
                European Psychiatry
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                0924-9338
                1778-3585
                28 September 2020
                : 63
                : 1
                : e87
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli” , Naples, Italy
                [2 ] Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste and Department of Mental Health, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina – ASUGI , Trieste, Italy
                [3 ] Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa , Pisa, Italy
                [4 ] Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca , Milan, Italy
                [5 ] Center for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, National Institute of Health , Rome, Italy
                [6 ] Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco and Aldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutic, University of Milan , Milano, Italy
                [7 ] Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara , Ferrara, Italy
                [8 ] Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome, Italy
                [9 ] Department of Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
                [10 ] Department of Psychiatry, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                [11 ] Department of Psychiatry, University of Perugia , Perugia, Italy
                [12 ] Clinical Psychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche , Ancona, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Andrea Fiorillo, E-mail: andrea.fiorillo@ 123456unicampania.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-1748
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-6169
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9440-1873
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-4977
                Article
                S0924933820000899
                10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.89
                7556907
                32981568
                26482358-bbc3-4ab7-8161-aa7769bc76d5
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 September 2020
                : 22 September 2020
                : 22 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, References: 110, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                anxiety,covid-19,depression,lockdown,pandemic,stress
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                anxiety, covid-19, depression, lockdown, pandemic, stress

                Comments

                Comment on this article