5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Risk factors associated with bloodstream infections among critically ill patients with COVID-19

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, The understanding and management of COVID-19 among hospitalised patients has evolved with increased use of dexamethasone and Tocilizumab. The ability of dexamethasone and Tocilizumab to dampen the excessive host inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 may be associated with improved mortality 1 , 2 . However, an increase in the incidence of secondary infections associated with these treatments is of concern. In this Journal, Lansbury and colleagues recently reviewed the occurrence of co-infections amongst patients with COVID-19 3 . We sought to evaluate risk factors associated with the development of bloodstream infection (BSI) among critically ill patients with COVID-19. Patients aged ≥18 years admitted to University College London Hospitals with a positive real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA between March 2020 and 1st February 2021 were included. The UK has to date experienced two major waves of COVID-19 infections, the first in March-August 2020 and the second in September 2020- March 2021. Ethical approval was granted by the London-Westminster Research Ethics Committee, the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) on 2nd July 2020 (REC reference 20/HRA/2505, IRAS ID 284088). Patient demographics, clinical data, blood culture results, treatments and outcome were recorded from electronic healthcare records on a standardized data collection form. Dexamethasone was prescribed on hospital admission at 6mg daily for 10 days. Tocilizumab was administered when patients progressed to requiring advanced respiratory support (high flow nasal oxygen, non-invasive ventilation, or invasive ventilation), as a single dose of 8mg/kg (up to a maximum dose of 800mg). Blood culture contaminants were defined as those not considered clinically significant at the time and did not require a clinical intervention. Continuous and categorical variables are reported as median (interquartile range) and n (%), respectively. Comparison of non-parametric continuous data between groups was performed using the Mann Whitney U test. Categorical data were compared using the chi-square test. Binary logistic regression was used to ascertain independent risk factors associated with BSI. Graphs were constructed, and statistical analysis performed using Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp). A total of 404 patients were included (Table 1 ), The median age of patients was 61 (51-69) years, 270 (67%) patients were male, 160 (40%) were admitted in the first surge, and 190 (47%) died in hospital. 102 patients (25%) received dexamethasone alone of who 53 patients (52%) died. An additional 45 patients (11%) received Tocilizumab in addition to dexamethasone of whom 22 (49%) died. No patients received Tocilizumab without dexamethasone. Table 1 Characteristics and treatment administered to critically ill COVID-19 patients with and without bloodstream infections Table 1 No positive blood cultures Positive blood cultures p-value 328 76 BMI 28 (24-33) 28 (24-33) 0.790 Age 62 (52-70) 60 (49-67) 0.104 Symptoms to hospital (days) 7 (5-10) 7 (4-10) 0.611 Follow up time (days) 20 (13-32) 41 (22-60) <0.001 Sex (Male) 205 (67%) 56 (74%) 0.277 Diabetes mellitus 89 (29%) 29 (39%) 0.120 Surge 1 128 (42%) 22 (29%) 0.038 IMV 196 (64%) 69 (91%) <0.001 Dexamethasone use 158 (52%) 53 (70%) 0.006 Tocilizumab use 31 (10%) 9 (12%) 0.669 Transfer from another hospital 124 (41%) 46 (61%) 0.002 Continuous positive airway pressure use 248 (81%) 59 (78%) 0.468 Cancer 34 (11%) 8 (8%) 0.417 Immunosuppression 37 (12%) 6 (8%) 0.300 Hospital mortality 145 (47.5%) 40 (52.6%) 0.427 Of the 404 patients with COVID-19, 76 (18.8%) patients had a clinically relevant positive blood culture (Table 1), most commonly a Coagulase negative Staphylococcus. The median time from hospital admission to BSI was 18 (11-26) days. Among the 76 patients who had a BSI, six (8%) had more than one organism isolated. The proportion of patients who died was similar between those with and without a BSI (p=0.202). Factors associated with BSI on univariate analysis included longer duration of follow up time (p<0.001), being admitted in the second surge (p=0.038), requirement for mechanical ventilation (p<0.001), dexamethasone use (p=0.006), and being transferred from another centre to ours (p=0.002). On correcting for follow up time, surge, mechanical ventilation, dexamethasone use, and age, mechanical ventilation (OR=2.1(1.1-3.9); p=0.028), longer follow up time (OR=1.013 (1.005-1.022); p=0.002), and younger age (OR=0.979 (0.968-0.990); p<0.001) were associated with a bacteraemia. Dexamethasone and Tocilizumab use were not independently associated with BSI. We report independent risk factors associated with the incidence of BSI in a critically ill patient cohort with COVID-19. Dexamethasone and Tocilizumab were not independently associated with BSI among critically ill patients with COVID-19. Similar findings have been reported among hospitalised patients with COVID-19, including non- critically ill 4 . Additionally, we found that the occurrence of a BSI was not associated with greater mortality on unadjusted analysis, consistent with findings from a UK national study 5 . Unsurprisingly, the longer duration of stay on ICU the greater the risk of developing a bacteremia; the latter being a time- dependent covariate. Invasive mechanical ventilation was also associated with a bacteremia, this may reflect greater illness severity which is associated with immune dysregulation in COVID-19 6 , 7 . Following the initial infectious insult and an associated hyperinflammatory state, a hypoinflammatory state with impaired ability to overcome secondary infections ensues during prolonged critical illness 8 . The time to develop a secondary infection was between 2 and 3 weeks; similar to other reports 4 , 9 . Younger age being associated with BSI is intriguing, and may reflect increased investigations among patients who appear more likely to have a favorable prognosis; including younger patients and those with fewer co-morbid illness. At the doses used, dexamethasone and Tocilizumab may not be associated with excessive immune suppression and increased risk of BSI. However, dexamethasone and Tocilizumab attenuate clinical features associated with bacteremia, including an elevated temperature and CRP. We cannot therefore exclude the possibility of occult bacteremia which was undiagnosed. This is of greater concern closer to the time of receiving dexamethasone or tocilizumab, which suppress CRP and temperature for a number of days following administration 9 . As with all retrospective analyses, we acknowledge the possibility of residual confounding, and that results are associative. The small number of patients included also warrants caution in interpreting the findings. There were no predefined criteria for obtaining blood cultures, and we have focused on positive bacteremia rates, but not infectious complications without an associated bacteremia. In summary, dexamethasone and Tocilizumab were not associated with increased risk of BSI in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Further prospective work investigating particular at-risk subgroups, and the use of diagnostics with greater sensitivity are warranted. Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interest to declare Ethical approval Ethical approval was granted by the London-Westminster Research Ethics Committee, the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) on 2nd July 2020 (REC reference 20/HRA/2505, IRAS ID 284088). CRediT authorship contribution statement Tim McMillan: Data curation Connor Jones: Data curation CJ O'Connor: Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing Daniel Nolan: Data curation Jayne Ellis: Data curation, Writing – review & editing Claire Thakker: Data curation, Writing – review & editing Katharina Kranzer: Data curation, Writing – review & editing Neil RH Stone: Data curation, Writing – review & editing M Singer: Writing – review & editing, Supervision APR Wilson: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration N Arulkumaran: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 — Preliminary Report

          Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage. Glucocorticoids may modulate inflammation-mediated lung injury and thereby reduce progression to respiratory failure and death. Methods In this controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19, we randomly assigned patients to receive oral or intravenous dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Here, we report the preliminary results of this comparison. Results A total of 2104 patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone and 4321 to receive usual care. Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110 patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.93; P<0.001). The proportional and absolute between-group differences in mortality varied considerably according to the level of respiratory support that the patients were receiving at the time of randomization. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs. 41.4%; rate ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs. 26.2%; rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14.0%; rate ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.55). Conclusions In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research and others; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04381936; ISRCTN number, 50189673.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complex Immune Dysregulation in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Respiratory Failure

            Summary Proper management of COVID-19 mandates better understanding of disease pathogenesis. The sudden clinical deterioration 7–8 days after initial symptom onset suggests that severe respiratory failure (SRF) in COVID-19 is driven by a unique pattern of immune dysfunction. We studied immune responses of 54 COVID-19 patients, 28 of whom had SRF. All patients with SRF displayed either macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) or very low human leukocyte antigen D related (HLA-DR) expression accompanied by profound depletion of CD4 lymphocytes, CD19 lymphocytes, and natural killer (NK) cells. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) production by circulating monocytes was sustained, a pattern distinct from bacterial sepsis or influenza. SARS-CoV-2 patient plasma inhibited HLA-DR expression, and this was partially restored by the IL-6 blocker Tocilizumab; off-label Tocilizumab treatment of patients was accompanied by increase in circulating lymphocytes. Thus, the unique pattern of immune dysregulation in severe COVID-19 is characterized by IL-6-mediated low HLA-DR expression and lymphopenia, associated with sustained cytokine production and hyper-inflammation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tocilizumab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

              Background In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of tocilizumab in adult patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 with both hypoxia and systemic inflammation. Methods This randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), is assessing several possible treatments in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in the UK. Those trial participants with hypoxia (oxygen saturation <92% on air or requiring oxygen therapy) and evidence of systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein ≥75 mg/L) were eligible for random assignment in a 1:1 ratio to usual standard of care alone versus usual standard of care plus tocilizumab at a dose of 400 mg–800 mg (depending on weight) given intravenously. A second dose could be given 12–24 h later if the patient's condition had not improved. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04381936). Findings Between April 23, 2020, and Jan 24, 2021, 4116 adults of 21 550 patients enrolled into the RECOVERY trial were included in the assessment of tocilizumab, including 3385 (82%) patients receiving systemic corticosteroids. Overall, 621 (31%) of the 2022 patients allocated tocilizumab and 729 (35%) of the 2094 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0·85; 95% CI 0·76–0·94; p=0·0028). Consistent results were seen in all prespecified subgroups of patients, including those receiving systemic corticosteroids. Patients allocated to tocilizumab were more likely to be discharged from hospital within 28 days (57% vs 50%; rate ratio 1·22; 1·12–1·33; p<0·0001). Among those not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, patients allocated tocilizumab were less likely to reach the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (35% vs 42%; risk ratio 0·84; 95% CI 0·77–0·92; p<0·0001). Interpretation In hospitalised COVID-19 patients with hypoxia and systemic inflammation, tocilizumab improved survival and other clinical outcomes. These benefits were seen regardless of the amount of respiratory support and were additional to the benefits of systemic corticosteroids. Funding UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Infect
                J Infect
                The Journal of Infection
                Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.
                0163-4453
                1532-2742
                16 September 2021
                16 September 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Bloomsbury Institute for Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Dr N Arulkumaran, Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Medicine University College London, Cruciform Building, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom, Tel: +44 208 383 2214, Fax: +44 208 383 2062
                [#]

                Authors contributed equally

                Article
                S0163-4453(21)00480-1
                10.1016/j.jinf.2021.09.010
                8444445
                26a6a7eb-5a91-4144-99da-59d26f82fff2
                © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 12 September 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                covid-19,bloodstream infection,corticosteroid,tocilizumab
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                covid-19, bloodstream infection, corticosteroid, tocilizumab

                Comments

                Comment on this article