70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    3
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consequences of Secondary Calibrations on Divergence Time Estimates

      research-article
      *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Secondary calibrations (calibrations based on the results of previous molecular dating studies) are commonly applied in divergence time analyses in groups that lack fossil data; however, the consequences of applying secondary calibrations in a relaxed-clock approach are not fully understood. I tested whether applying the posterior estimate from a primary study as a prior distribution in a secondary study results in consistent age and uncertainty estimates. I compared age estimates from simulations with 100 randomly replicated secondary trees. On average, the 95% credible intervals of node ages for secondary estimates were significantly younger and narrower than primary estimates. The primary and secondary age estimates were significantly different in 97% of the replicates after Bonferroni corrections. Greater error in magnitude was associated with deeper than shallower nodes, but the opposite was found when standardized by median node age, and a significant positive relationship was determined between the number of tips/age of secondary trees and the total amount of error. When two secondary calibrated nodes were analyzed, estimates remained significantly different, and although the minimum and median estimates were associated with less error, maximum age estimates and credible interval widths had greater error. The shape of the prior also influenced error, in which applying a normal, rather than uniform, prior distribution resulted in greater error. Secondary calibrations, in summary, lead to a false impression of precision and the distribution of age estimates shift away from those that would be inferred by the primary analysis. These results suggest that secondary calibrations should not be applied as the only source of calibration in divergence time analyses that test time-dependent hypotheses until the additional error associated with secondary calibrations is more properly modeled to take into account increased uncertainty in age estimates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution.

          A simple model for the evolution of the rate of molecular evolution is presented. With a Bayesian approach, this model can serve as the basis for estimating dates of important evolutionary events even in the absence of the assumption of constant rates among evolutionary lineages. The method can be used in conjunction with any of the widely used models for nucleotide substitution or amino acid replacement. It is illustrated by analyzing a data set of rbcL protein sequences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach.

              Rates of molecular evolution vary widely between lineages, but quantification of how rates change has proven difficult. Recently proposed estimation procedures have mainly adopted highly parametric approaches that model rate evolution explicitly. In this study, a semiparametric smoothing method is developed using penalized likelihood. A saturated model in which every lineage has a separate rate is combined with a roughness penalty that discourages rates from varying too much across a phylogeny. A data-driven cross-validation criterion is then used to determine an optimal level of smoothing. This criterion is based on an estimate of the average prediction error associated with pruning lineages from the tree. The methods are applied to three data sets of six genes across a sample of land plants. Optimally smoothed estimates of absolute rates entailed 2- to 10-fold variation across lineages.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                29 January 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 1
                : e0148228
                Affiliations
                [001]Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, United States of America
                BiK-F Biodiversity and Climate Research Center, GERMANY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JS. Performed the experiments: JS. Analyzed the data: JS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JS. Wrote the paper: JS.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-49723
                10.1371/journal.pone.0148228
                4732660
                26824760
                26b6aaea-4b62-44ec-9b27-5921d3a00a76
                © 2016 John J. Schenk

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 November 2015
                : 14 January 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 1, Pages: 17
                Funding
                The author has no support or funding to report.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Molecular Biology Assays and Analysis Techniques
                Phylogenetic Analysis
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Molecular Biology Assays and Analysis Techniques
                Phylogenetic Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Paleontology
                Fossils
                Fossil Calibration
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Fossils
                Fossil Calibration
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Systematics
                Phylogenetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Taxonomy
                Evolutionary Systematics
                Phylogenetics
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Data Management
                Taxonomy
                Evolutionary Systematics
                Phylogenetics
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Probability Theory
                Probability Distribution
                Normal Distribution
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Paleontology
                Fossils
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Fossils
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Molecular Evolution
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Biochemical Simulations
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Computational Biology
                Biochemical Simulations
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are available through Georgia Southern University Digital Commons at: http://dx.doi.org/10.20429/data.2016.1.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article