6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Evidence for marine biogenic influence on summertime Arctic aerosol : SUMMERTIME ARCTIC AEROSOL COMPOSITION

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolution of organic aerosols in the atmosphere.

          Organic aerosol (OA) particles affect climate forcing and human health, but their sources and evolution remain poorly characterized. We present a unifying model framework describing the atmospheric evolution of OA that is constrained by high-time-resolution measurements of its composition, volatility, and oxidation state. OA and OA precursor gases evolve by becoming increasingly oxidized, less volatile, and more hygroscopic, leading to the formation of oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA), with concentrations comparable to those of sulfate aerosol throughout the Northern Hemisphere. Our model framework captures the dynamic aging behavior observed in both the atmosphere and laboratory: It can serve as a basis for improving parameterizations in regional and global models.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Arctic’s rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: a research synthesis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications

              Elemental compositions of organic aerosol (OA) particles provide useful constraints on OA sources, chemical evolution, and effects. The Aerodyne high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) is widely used to measure OA elemental composition. This study evaluates AMS measurements of atomic oxygen-to-carbon (O : C), hydrogen-to-carbon (H : C), and organic mass-to-organic carbon (OM : OC) ratios, and of carbon oxidation state ( OS C ) for a vastly expanded laboratory data set of multifunctional oxidized OA standards. For the expanded standard data set, the method introduced by Aiken et al. (2008), which uses experimentally measured ion intensities at all ions to determine elemental ratios (referred to here as "Aiken-Explicit"), reproduces known O : C and H : C ratio values within 20% (average absolute value of relative errors) and 12%, respectively. The more commonly used method, which uses empirically estimated H 2 O + and CO + ion intensities to avoid gas phase air interferences at these ions (referred to here as "Aiken-Ambient"), reproduces O : C and H : C of multifunctional oxidized species within 28 and 14% of known values. The values from the latter method are systematically biased low, however, with larger biases observed for alcohols and simple diacids. A detailed examination of the H 2 O + , CO + , and CO 2 + fragments in the high-resolution mass spectra of the standard compounds indicates that the Aiken-Ambient method underestimates the CO + and especially H 2 O + produced from many oxidized species. Combined AMS–vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) ionization measurements indicate that these ions are produced by dehydration and decarboxylation on the AMS vaporizer (usually operated at 600 °C). Thermal decomposition is observed to be efficient at vaporizer temperatures down to 200 °C. These results are used together to develop an "Improved-Ambient" elemental analysis method for AMS spectra measured in air. The Improved-Ambient method uses specific ion fragments as markers to correct for molecular functionality-dependent systematic biases and reproduces known O : C (H : C) ratios of individual oxidized standards within 28% (13%) of the known molecular values. The error in Improved-Ambient O : C (H : C) values is smaller for theoretical standard mixtures of the oxidized organic standards, which are more representative of the complex mix of species present in ambient OA. For ambient OA, the Improved-Ambient method produces O : C (H : C) values that are 27% (11%) larger than previously published Aiken-Ambient values; a corresponding increase of 9% is observed for OM : OC values. These results imply that ambient OA has a higher relative oxygen content than previously estimated. The OS C values calculated for ambient OA by the two methods agree well, however (average relative difference of 0.06 OS C units). This indicates that OS C is a more robust metric of oxidation than O : C, likely since OS C is not affected by hydration or dehydration, either in the atmosphere or during analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Geophysical Research Letters
                Geophys. Res. Lett.
                Wiley
                00948276
                June 28 2017
                June 28 2017
                June 29 2017
                : 44
                : 12
                : 6460-6470
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Chemistry; University of Toronto; Toronto Ontario Canada
                [2 ]Max Planck Institute for Chemistry; Mainz Germany
                [3 ]Institute for Atmospheric Physics; Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz; Mainz Germany
                [4 ]LATMOS/IPSL, UPMC, UVSQ, CNRS; Paris France
                [5 ]School of Engineering; University of Guelph; Guelph Ontario Canada
                [6 ]Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz-Center for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven; Bremerhaven Germany
                [7 ]Environment and Climate Change Canada; Toronto Ontario Canada
                Article
                10.1002/2017GL073359
                26c17cec-c98c-460f-9691-f8bdbbe76863
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article