16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Oncoaudit: desenvolvimento e avaliação de aplicativo para enfermeiros auditores Translated title: Oncoaudit: development and evaluation of an application for nurse auditors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objetivo: Desenvolver aplicativo de consulta de medicamentos quimioterápicos para sistema web e dispositivo móvel para auxiliar na auditoria em enfermagem de contas hospitalares e avaliar quanto a satisfação do usuário e usabilidade. Métodos: Pesquisa de produção tecnológica contendo desenvolvimento de aplicativo web e para tecnologia móvel. O produto foi avaliado quanto à satisfação por enfermeiros auditores utilizando o questionário System Usability Scale (SUS) e quanto à usabilidade pelas heurísticas de Nielsen, por profissionais de informática em saúde. Resultados: O aplicativo esta disponível no http://telemedicina6.unifesp.br/projeto/oncoaudit. O aplicativo móvel pode ser acessado em http://play.google.com/intl/pt-BR/about/index.html. A avaliação pelos enfermeiros indicou que o aplicativo web e móvel estão de acordo com as necessidades dos usuários. Na avaliação de usabilidade foram identificados 14 problemas no aplicativo móvel e oito no sistema web, gerando modificações am ambos. Conclusão: Os métodos escolhidos para desenvolvimento e avaliação mostraram-se satisfatórios para atingir os objetivos propostos.

          Translated abstract

          Objective: To develop a web and mobile device application to search for chemotherapy drugs to support nursing audits of hospital bills and to evaluate user satisfaction and tool usability. Methods: Research of technological production for development of an application for web and mobile technology. The product was evaluated by nurse auditors using the System Usability Scale questionnaire. It was also evalutated by health informactics professionals using Nielsen's heuristics. Results: The application is available at http://telemedicina6.unifesp.br/projeto/oncoaudit. The mobile version can be is accessed at http://play.google.com/intl/pt-BR/about/index.html. Nurse evalaution indicated that the web and mobile versions addressed user needs. In the usability evaluation, 14 problems were identified in the mobile version and eight in the web system. Implementation of improvements according to the evaluation findings were made in both versions. Conclusion: The methods for development and evaluation were adequate to achieve the proposed objective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Sistemas de informação em saúde: considerações gerais

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Desenvolvimento e Avaliação de um Protocolo Eletrônico para Atendimento e Monitoramento do Paciente com Doença Celíaca

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Primary care providers' acceptance of health information exchange utilizing IHE XDS.

              We assessed primary care providers' perception of a health information exchange system (HIE) based on IHE XDS. The HIE will be part of a regional health network in the metropolitan area of Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany. An application enabling access to medical documents in an XDS Affinity Domain was developed. We examined usability and factors related to user acceptance. User perception was probed using system usability scale (SUS) and semi-structured interviews. The evaluation was performed on 7 participants. The SUS showed an above average usability with a median score of 77.5. During interviews, participants submitted suggestions for additional features and improvement of usability. Poor integration of functionality into existing workflows was most frequently criticized. While usability was well perceived by primary care providers, challenges remain in adoption of XDS based IHE. To speed up document access in time-critical domains, we suggest use of complementary methods, enabling directed communication flows.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                ape
                Acta Paulista de Enfermagem
                Acta paul. enferm.
                Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (São Paulo )
                1982-0194
                April 2014
                : 27
                : 2
                : 179-185
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
                [2 ] Universidade Federal de São Paulo Brazil
                Article
                S0103-21002014000200015
                10.1590/1982-0194201400031
                26c584e8-c9cb-419d-925b-ce8f6579b92f

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0103-2100&lng=en
                Categories
                NURSING

                Nursing
                Nursing audit,Nursing informatics,Mobile applications,Medical informatics,Pharmaceutical preparations,Auditoria de enfermagem,Informática em enfermagem,Aplicativos móveis,Informática em saúde,Preparações farmacêuticas

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content796

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors50