3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Inhibitory and Coactivating Receptors Recognising the Same Ligand: Immune Homeostasis Exploited by Pathogens and Tumours

      review-article
      1 , * , 2 , *
      Trends in Immunology
      Elsevier Ltd.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coactivating and inhibitory receptors that share at least one ligand interact with a wide variety of ligands, indicating their importance in a range of situations. Here, we discuss principles of mainly human paired receptor function and ligand recognition, and possible therapeutic implications of targeting these receptors in cancer, autoimmune diseases, and allergy. We summarise and emphasise the idea that these receptors, which have evolved in part in response to pathogen pressure, fine-tune the immune response, preserve homeostasis, and that pathogens and tumours use the dominance of the inhibitory receptors over the coactivating receptors to avoid immune elimination. Finally, we discuss the options of using paired receptors and their ligand for immune cell education and therapy.

          Trends

          Paired receptors were initially described as activating and inhibitory receptors homologous in their extracellular domains and located in close proximity on the genome.

          Here we give a broader definition, as a pair of receptors that includes an inhibitory and a coactivating receptor; where each member has at least one common cellular ligand, and upon binding, exerts contrasting effects (inhibition or co-stimulation).

          In these pairs, the inhibitory receptor binds the shared ligand with greater affinity than does the coactivating receptor.

          This high-affinity binding of the inhibitory receptor results also in competitive binding. Some of the inhibitory receptors can also exert their function by physically interacting with the activating receptor and preventing its activity.

          Inhibitory receptors and ligands for paired receptors are used by pathogens and tumours for immune evasion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C.

          The protein HLA-E is a non-classical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule of limited sequence variability. Its expression on the cell surface is regulated by the binding of peptides derived from the signal sequence of some other MHC class I molecules. Here we report the identification of ligands for HLA-E. We constructed tetramers in which recombinant HLA-E and beta2-microglobulin were refolded with an MHC leader-sequence peptide, biotinylated, and conjugated to phycoerythrin-labelled Extravidin. This HLA-E tetramer bound to natural killer (NK) cells and a small subset of T cells from peripheral blood. On transfectants, the tetramer bound to the CD94/NKG2A, CD94/NKGK2B and CD94/NKG2C NK cell receptors, but did not bind to the immunoglobulin family of NK cell receptors (KIR). Surface expression of HLA-E was enough to protect target cells from lysis by CD94/NKG2A+ NK-cell clones. A subset of HLA class I alleles has been shown to inhibit killing by CD94/NKG2A+ NK-cell clones. Only the HLA alleles that possess a leader peptide capable of upregulating HLA-E surface expression confer resistance to NK-cell-mediated lysis, implying that their action is mediated by HLA-E, the predominant ligand for the NK cell inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The receptors CD96 and CD226 oppose each other in the regulation of natural killer cell functions.

            CD96, CD226 (DNAM-1) and TIGIT belong to an emerging family of receptors that interact with nectin and nectin-like proteins. CD226 activates natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity, whereas TIGIT reportedly counterbalances CD226. In contrast, the role of CD96, which shares the ligand CD155 with CD226 and TIGIT, has remained unclear. In this study we found that CD96 competed with CD226 for CD155 binding and limited NK cell function by direct inhibition. As a result, Cd96(-/-) mice displayed hyperinflammatory responses to the bacterial product lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and resistance to carcinogenesis and experimental lung metastases. Our data provide the first description, to our knowledge, of the ability of CD96 to negatively control cytokine responses by NK cells. Blocking CD96 may have applications in pathologies in which NK cells are important.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Balancing natural killer cell activation through paired receptors.

              Natural killer (NK) cells are innate lymphocytes that are crucial for the control of infections and malignancies. NK cells express a variety of inhibitory and activating receptors that facilitate fine discrimination between damaged and healthy cells. Among them, a family of molecules that bind nectin and nectin-like proteins has recently emerged and has been shown to function as an important regulator of NK cell functions. These molecules include CD226, T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT), CD96, and cytotoxic and regulatory T cell molecule (CRTAM). In this Review, we focus on the recent advances in our understanding of how these receptors regulate NK cell biology and of their roles in pathologies such as cancer, infection and autoimmunity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Trends Immunol
                Trends Immunol
                Trends in Immunology
                Elsevier Ltd.
                1471-4906
                1471-4981
                20 October 2017
                February 2018
                20 October 2017
                : 39
                : 2
                : 112-122
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics Unit, School of Pharmacy, Institute for Drug Research, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
                [2 ]The Lautenberg Center for General and Tumor Immunology, The Department of Immunology and Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, IMRIC, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
                Author notes
                Article
                S1471-4906(17)30188-6
                10.1016/j.it.2017.10.001
                7106362
                29066058
                26c699ff-f27f-405c-908a-46eb918c4a2c
                © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Immunology
                Immunology

                Comments

                Comment on this article