16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      StopWatch: The Preliminary Evaluation of a Smartwatch-Based System for Passive Detection of Cigarette Smoking

      review-article
      , PhD 1 , 2 , 3 , , BSc 1 , 2 , 3 , , MEng 4 , , PhD 1 , 2 , 3
      Nicotine & Tobacco Research
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Recent developments in smoking cessation support systems and interventions have highlighted the requirement for unobtrusive, passive ways to measure smoking behavior. A number of systems have been developed for this that either use bespoke sensing technology, or expensive combinations of wearables and smartphones. Here, we present StopWatch, a system for passive detection of cigarette smoking that runs on a low-cost smartwatch and does not require additional sensing or a connected smartphone.

          Methods

          Our system uses motion data from the accelerometer and gyroscope in an Android smartwatch to detect the signature hand movements of cigarette smoking. It uses machine learning techniques to transform raw motion data into motion features, and in turn into individual drags and instances of smoking. These processes run on the smartwatch, and do not require a smartphone.

          Results

          We conducted preliminary validations of the system in daily smokers ( n = 13) in laboratory and free-living conditions running on an Android LG G-Watch. In free-living conditions, over a 24-h period, the system achieved precision of 86% and recall of 71%.

          Conclusions

          StopWatch is a system for passive measurement of cigarette smoking that runs entirely on a commercially available Android smartwatch. It requires no smartphone so the cost is low, and needs no bespoke sensing equipment so participant burden is also low. Performance is currently lower than other more expensive and complex systems, though adequate for some applications. Future developments will focus on enhancing performance, validation on a range of smartwatches, and detection of electronic cigarette use.

          Implications

          We present a low-cost, smartwatch-based system for passive detection of cigarette smoking. It uses data from the motion sensors in the watch to identify the signature hand movements of cigarette smoking. The system will provide the detailed measures of individual smoking behavior needed for context-triggered just-in-time smoking cessation support systems, and to enable just-in-time adaptive interventions. More broadly, the system will enable researchers to obtain detailed measures of individual smoking behavior in free-living conditions that are free from the recall errors and reporting biases associated with self-report of smoking.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers

          Lukasz Piwek and colleagues consider whether wearable technology can become a valuable asset for health care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Association Between Cigarette Smoking Prevalence and Income Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

            Previous evidence linked low socioeconomic status with higher smoking prevalence. Our objective was to assess the strength of this association in the world population, updating a previous work.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Are self-reports of smoking rate biased? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

              This study determined evidence for digit preference in self-reports of smoking in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). Subjects were 4275 adult smokers. Self-reports of smoking showed a marked degree of digit preference, with the vast majority of smokers reporting in multiples of 10 cigarettes per day. When number per day was compared to an objective measure of smoking exposure (carboxyhemoglobin; n = 2070) the distribution was found to be significantly assymetrical. Analysis of the distribution of COHb and various levels of number per day indicates that the differences in distribution are not due to variability in COHb. Heavier smokers, Caucasians, and those with less education were more likely to report a digit preference than lighter smokers. African-Americans, and those with more education. Results suggest that self-reports of number of cigarettes per day may be biased towards round numbers (particularly 20 cigarettes per day). Implications for assessment of smoking behavior are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nicotine Tob Res
                Nicotine Tob. Res
                nictob
                Nicotine & Tobacco Research
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1462-2203
                1469-994X
                February 2019
                24 January 2018
                24 January 2018
                : 21
                : 2
                : 257-261
                Affiliations
                [1 ]MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [2 ]School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [3 ]United Kingdom Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                [4 ]Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Andrew L. Skinner, PhD, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK. Telephone: +44-117-9288581; Fax: +44-117-9288588; E-mail: andy.skinner@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
                Article
                nty008
                10.1093/ntr/nty008
                6042639
                29373720
                26eb7258-f64f-48ce-9155-8ece4930ca4b
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Page count
                Pages: 5
                Product
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol
                Award ID: MC_UU_12013/6
                Award ID: MC_UU_12013/7
                Categories
                Commentaries

                Agriculture
                Agriculture

                Comments

                Comment on this article