20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PROSPECT guideline for oncological breast surgery: a systematic review and procedure‐specific postoperative pain management recommendations

      letter
      1 , 2 , , 3 , 4 , 5 , the PROSPECT Working Group collaborators
      Anaesthesia
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      analgesia, breast surgery, evidence‐based medicine, pain, systematic review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Analgesic protocols used to treat pain after breast surgery vary significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on this topic and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after oncological breast surgery. A systematic review using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis guidance with procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials assessing postoperative pain using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified. Seven hundred and forty‐nine studies were found, of which 53 randomised controlled trials and nine meta‐analyses met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Quantitative analysis suggests that dexamethasone and gabapentin reduced postoperative pain. The use of paravertebral blocks also reduced postoperative pain scores, analgesia consumption and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Intra‐operative opioid requirements were documented to be lower when a pectoral nerves block was performed, which also reduced postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. We recommend basic analgesics (i.e. paracetamol and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs) administered pre‐operatively or intra‐operatively and continued postoperatively. In addition, pre‐operative gabapentin and dexamethasone are also recommended. In major breast surgery, a regional anaesthetic technique such as paravertebral block or pectoral nerves block and/or local anaesthetic wound infiltration may be considered for additional pain relief. Paravertebral block may be continued postoperatively using catheter techniques. Opioids should be reserved as rescue analgesics in the postoperative period. Research is needed to evaluate the role of novel regional analgesic techniques such as erector spinae plane or retrolaminar plane blocks combined with basic analgesics in an enhanced recovery setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Do surgical patients benefit from perioperative gabapentin/pregabalin? A systematic review of efficacy and safety.

          Gabapentin and pregabalin have antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic properties useful for treating neuropathic pain. These properties may also be beneficial in acute postoperative pain. In this study we evaluated randomized, controlled trials examining the analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and clinical value of gabapentinoids in postoperative pain. A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases yielded 22 randomized, controlled trials on perioperative administration of gabapentinoids for postoperative pain relief. Pain relief was better in the gabapentin groups compared with the control groups. The opioid-sparing effect during the first 24 h after a single dose of gabapentin 300-1200 mg, administered 1-2 h preoperatively, ranged from 20% to 62%. The combined effect of a single dose of gabapentin was a reduction of opioid consumption equivalent to 30 +/- 4 mg of morphine (mean +/- 95% CI) during the first 24 h after surgery. Metaregression analysis suggested that the gabapentin-induced reduction in the 24-h opioid consumption was not significantly dependent on the gabapentin dose. Gabapentin reduced opioid-related adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention (number-needed-to-treat 25, 6, and 7, respectively). The most common adverse effects of the gabapentinoids were sedation and dizziness (number-needed-to-harm 35 and 12, respectively). Gabapentinoids effectively reduce postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and opioid-related adverse effects after surgery. Conclusions about the optimal dose and duration of the treatment cannot be made because of the heterogeneity of the trials. Studies are needed to determine the long-term benefits, if any, of perioperative gabapentinoids.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

            The pectoral nerves (Pecs) block types I and II are novel techniques to block the pectoral, intercostobrachial, third to sixth intercostals, and the long thoracic nerves. They may provide good analgesia during and after breast surgery. Our study aimed to compare prospectively the quality of analgesia after modified radical mastectomy surgery using general anesthesia and Pecs blocks versus general anesthesia alone.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

              Pectoral nerve (PecS) block is a recently introduced technique for providing surgical anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia during breast surgery. The present study was planned to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided PecS II block with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Resident
                Role: Consultantadrien.lemoine@aphp.fr
                Role: Professor
                Role: Professor
                Role: Professor
                Journal
                Anaesthesia
                Anaesthesia
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044
                ANAE
                Anaesthesia
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0003-2409
                1365-2044
                26 January 2020
                May 2020
                : 75
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/anae.v75.5 )
                : 664-673
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Cardiovascular Sciences KULeuven and University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium
                [ 2 ] Service d'Anesthésie – Réanimation et Médecine Péri‐opératoire Hopital Tenon APHP Paris, France/Médecine‐Sorbonne Université Paris France
                [ 3 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Cardiovascular Sciences KULeuven and University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium
                [ 5 ] Service d'Anesthésie – Réanimation et Médecine Péri‐opératoire Hopital Tenon APHP Paris, France/Médecine‐Sorbonne Université Paris France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: A. Lemoine

                Email: adrien.lemoine@ 123456aphp.fr

                Article
                ANAE14964
                10.1111/anae.14964
                7187257
                31984479
                2734235b-fc88-493d-99be-37bc0be54373
                © 2020 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 27 November 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 10, Words: 7101
                Categories
                Guidelines
                Guidelines
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.1 mode:remove_FC converted:28.04.2020

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                analgesia,breast surgery,evidence‐based medicine,pain,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article