52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effect of Applying Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) on Nursing Students’ Clinical Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Remarkable advances in educational measurement have proved need to the implementation of modern and appropriate methods of clinical evaluation. This study was carried out to compare the effect of applying direct observation procedural skills and routine evaluation method on clinical skills of nursing students.

          Methods:

          This randomized clinical trial was conducted on students of Nursing Army College, Tehran, Iran. After obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee of the Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Research Deputy, all nursing students and instructors who agreed to participate in this study sign the informed consent. The participants were randomly assigned into intervention and control groups. After the teachers were trained and an inter-raters reliability test was conducted, evaluation was performed through DOPS in the intervention group while the control groups were evaluated through the routine method. Assessment checklists for two procedures (Intra venous catheterization and change dressing) were valid and reliable. Finally data were analyzed through descriptive and analytical statistics (Chi-square, t-test, Repeated Measure ANOVA) using SPSS version 16.

          Results:

          No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic variables (P>0.05), but a significant difference was observed between intervention and control scores (P=0.000). In other words, application of DOPS has improved clinical skills of the students significantly.

          Conclusion:

          Using this new method improved the students’ scores in clinical procedures implementation; therefore, we suggest that nursing colleges apply this evaluation method for clinical education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): review of literature and implications for nursing education.

          Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been used to assess medical students since the mid 1970s, and in more recent years has been increasingly utilised to assess students from nursing and the allied health professions. This growing utilisation has led to considerable debate within the literature pertaining to the optimal use of OSCE as an assessment process. The purpose of this paper is to present a narrative review regarding some of the key issues affecting the utilisation of OSCE within the assessment of nursing students. The paper briefly reviews the historical development of OSCE within health professional assessment, and summarises some of its key strengths and limitations. It then offers a more 'in depth' consideration of the research literature pertaining to the reliability and validity of the OSCE process, which is then used as a basis for exploring some of the particular issues that need to be considered when OSCE is used to assess nursing students. Key issues identified include the need to carefully prepare and pilot new OSCE examinations and marking tools in order to ensure reliability and validity is optimised, and also the need to carefully consider the length, number and interdependence of OSCE stations to ensure that the potentially competing requirements of validity and reliability are balanced. The paper also recognises that whilst the evidence base regarding OSCE is extensive, the evidence base specific to nursing is more limited. There is therefore scope for further research in this area, as well as the need for careful debate regarding how national guidance may be a way of enhancing and standardising future OSCE examinations. The paper concludes that whilst caution must be applied in relying on OSCE as a sole means of practitioner assessment, used carefully it can make a helpful and meaningful contribution to health professional education.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?

            This study aimed to monitor which undergraduate students collected formative feedback on their degree essays and to quantify any correlations between gender or summative mark achieved and whether formative feedback was sought. We carried out a study at the University of Aberdeen Medical School, involving a total of 360 Year 3 students, comprising all 177 students in the 2004 cohort and 183 in 2005. Data on gender and summative mark were routinely collected during the degree assessment processes in March 2004 and 2005. Students signed on receipt of their feedback. Less than half the students (46%) collected their formative feedback: 47% in 2004, and 45% in 2005. Overall, females were significantly more likely than males to seek formative feedback (P = 0.004). Higher achievers were significantly more likely than lower achievers to seek their feedback (P = 0.020). Our findings indicate that these medical students, particularly males and poor students, may not use assessment feedback as a learning experience. Female and better students are keener to seek out formative feedback that might be expected to help them continue to do well. We need to explore further why so many students do not access formative feedback, and develop strategies for addressing this issue effectively.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program.

              MyStudentBody.com-Nutrition (MSB-N) is an internet-based nutrition and physical activity education program for college students. Students from six universities (N=476) in the U.S. were randomly assigned in the fall of 2005 to one of three groups: MSB-N (Experimental I), MSB-N plus Booster (Experimental II), or an attention placebo control group. Experimental I and II group participants increased their fruit and vegetable intake by .33 and .24 servings, respectively, relative to the control group at post-test. Both experimental groups improved their motivation to change eating behaviors (p<.05) and were also more likely to increase their social support and self-efficacy for dietary change (p's<.05). Experimental groups also improved their attitude toward exercise (p<.05), but no behavioral changes in physical activity were noted. MyStudentBody.com-Nutrition is an effective internet-based program that may have wide applicability on college campuses for nutrition education and promoting change in health behaviors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glob J Health Sci
                Glob J Health Sci
                Global Journal of Health Science
                Canadian Center of Science and Education (Canada )
                1916-9736
                1916-9744
                December 2015
                26 March 2015
                : 7
                : 7
                : 17-21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Nursing, Aja University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
                [2 ]Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [3 ]Behavioral Sciences Research Center (BSRC), Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [4 ]Faculty of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Khaghanizade Morteza, Behavioral Sciences Research Center (BSRC), Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: 98-21-2228-9941. Fax: 98-21-2612-7237. E-mail: khaghanizade11@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                GJHS-7-17
                10.5539/gjhs.v7n7p17
                4803945
                26153199
                273820a2-2230-4d1b-9d23-aef6a5ad6710
                Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 02 December 2014
                : 28 January 2015
                Categories
                Articles

                dops,direct observation of procedural skills,clinical evaluation,nursing education

                Comments

                Comment on this article