19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative effects of sibutramine and orlistat on weight loss, glucose metabolism and leptin levels in non-diabetic obese patients: A prospective study

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, Obesity is a serious public health problem, associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of sibutramine and orlistat on weight loss, Insulin Resistance (IR), leptin High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) in non-diabetic obese patients. This was a 12-week prospective non-randomized open-label study. Patients were assigned to either sibutramine or orlistat. Lipidemic profile, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and IR indexes, leptin, and hsCRP were measured before and after 4 and 12 weeks. The study was terminated early due to sibutramine's recent withdrawal from the market. In all, 31 patients met the eligibility criteria and were assigned to either sibutramine (18 patients, 16 female/2 male; age 43.2±14.9 years) or orlistat (13 patients, 12 female/1 male, aged 48.3±16.0 years) treatment. All of them completed the four-week visit, but only 21 patients completed the 12-week visit [10 of the sibutramine (8 female/2 male) and 11 of the orlistat (10 female/1 male) group] mainly due to sibutramine withdrawal from the market (n=5). Mild adverse events developed mainly in the sibutramine group and one patient dropped out due to development of hypertension. At four weeks of treatment, body weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) were significantly reduced in both groups [-5% or -4.8±0.8 kg (P=0.001) and -10% or -4.2±2.1 kg/m2 (P<0.001), respectively, for sibutramine and -3% or -2.9±0.5 kg, (P=0.001) and -3% or -1.7±0.2 kg/m2, (P=0.003), respectively, for orlistat]. Change in weight was greater in the sibutramine group as compared with the orlistat group (P=0.018). Regarding those who completed the 12 weeks of treatment, both drugs led to further weight reduction [from 106±18 kg at baseline to 95±14 kg at 12 weeks with sibutramine (P<0.001) and from 93±12 kg to 87±11 kg with orlistat (P< 0.001)], although without significant differences between the two drugs. Orlistat led to a significant reduction in diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) (-8.6 ± 3.0 mm Hg or 9%, P=0.011) at four weeks, whereas sibutramine was associated with a non-significant increase in both systolic and diastolic BP and pulse rate. Orlistat led to significant reduction in Total Cholesterol (TC), Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides and non--High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) after 4 weeks of treatment (11%, 13%, 13%, and 11%, respectively), whereas sibutramine decreased TC and HDL-C (7% and 11%, respectively). However, these differences were not significant in between-group comparisons. In those who completed 12 weeks of treatment, the differences remained significant only for orlistat in terms of total cholesterol reduction (P=0.024), mainly due to a trend towards LDL-C reduction (P=0.084). However, all changes in serum lipid levels did not remain statistically significant after adjustment for weight loss. Both agents led to significant reduction in leptin levels, which were dependent on deltas in weight. Regarding fasting plasma glucose metabolism and hsCRP, no significant differences within or between groups were observed. Our study, despite its early termination, demonstrated that both drugs were effective in weight reduction at 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. Sibutramine resulted in a greater weight loss at 4 weeks and orlistat to a significant decrease in diastolic BP. Conflicting data exist regarding the weight-lowering efficacy of these drugs.[1 2] In terms of BP, sibutramine may be associated with an increase or no effect at all.[3] A meta-analysis has reported that 1-year treatment with orlistat is associated with a mild decrease in BP and pulse rate.[4] In our study, orlistat exerted a trend towards more favourable effects on lipid levels. Regarding lipid metabolism, conflicting data exist for sibutramine.[4] In a meta-analysis of 15 studies, orlistat led to a significant reduction in TC levels, independent of weight loss.[5] The impact of both drugs on glucose metabolism seems to be beneficial in most studies, associated with weight loss.[3] However, we failed to show any effect of both drugs on glucose metabolism or IR, perhaps due to the small number of patients. Both drugs led to comparable reductions in leptin levels, although dependently on weight loss, as has been shown previously.[3] In conclusion, sibutramine and orlistat were effective in weight reduction, with orlistat having a more favourable effect on lipid profile. Their effect on glucose metabolism was similarly neutral.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The use of sibutramine in the management of obesity and related disorders: An update

          Aims: To review the major trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of the use of sibutramine for weight loss and the impact of this agent on obesity-related disorders. Methods and results: The most important articles on sibutramine up to January 2009 were located by a PubMed and Medline search. Sibutramine reduces food intake and body weight more than placebo and has positive effects on the lipid profile (mainly triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol), glycemic control and inflammatory markers in studies for up to one year. Preliminary studies showed that sibutramine may also improve other obesity-associated disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome, left ventricular hypertrophy, binge eating disorder and adolescent obesity. The high discontinuation rates and some safety issues mainly due to the increase in blood pressure and pulse rate have to be considered. Additionally, it has not yet been established that treatment with sibutramine will reduce cardiovascular events and total mortality. Conclusions: Sibutramine, in conjunction with lifestyle measures, is a useful drug for reducing body weight and improving associated cardiometabolic risk factors and obesity-related disorders. Studies of longer duration are required to determine the precise indications of the drug, to evaluate safety issues and to assess its efficacy on cardiovascular mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of efficacy of sibutramine or orlistat versus their combination in obese women.

            Sibutramine and orlistat are currently used for weight loss. We aimed to investigate the effect of orlistat and sibutramine combination therapy in treatment of obese women. Study population consisted of 89 obese women who had a body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2, were normotensive, and had normal glucose tolerance. All patients were placed on a diet which contained fat approximately 30% of total calorie intake and the diet was designed to cause an energy deficit of approximately 2.51-3.56 megajoule/day. At the first month of diet (baseline), all patients were randomly divided into three therapy groups: Diet + Orlistat (group 1; n = 30 patients), Diet + Sibutramine (group 2; n = 29 patients), Diet + Orlistat + Sibutramine (group 3; n = 30 patients). Body weight, body fat distribution and serum lipid levels were evaluated baseline and after six months in all subjects. Mean weight loss was 5.5 +/- 4.9 kg (p = 0.024) in group 1, 10.1 +/- 3.6 kg (p < 0.001) in group 2, 10.8 +/- 6.6 kg (p < 0.001) in group 3 after the six months. Weight loss was significantly greater in group 2 (p = 0.003) and group 3 (p = 0.002) when compared with group 1. Percentage of mean weight loss was 5.5 +/- 3.1% in group 1, 10.2 +/- 4.8% in group 2, 10.6 +/- 5.7% in group 3. Percentage of weight loss was higher in group 2 (p = 0.01) and group 3 (p = 0.009) when compared with group 1. Weight loss and percentage of weight loss were not different between group 2 and group 3. These three regimens had different results on weight loss in obese women. Combination drug therapy and sibutramine therapy were both more effective than orlistat therapy alone. However, no significant difference was noted between combination drug therapy and sibutramine treatment groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and safety comparative evaluation of orlistat and sibutramine treatment in hypertensive obese patients.

              The aim of our study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of orlistat and sibutramine treatment in obese hypertensive patients, with a specific attention to cardiovascular effects and to side effects because of this treatment. Patients were enrolled, evaluated and followed at three Italian Centres of Internal Medicine. We evaluated 115 obese and hypertensive patients. (55 males and 60 females; 26 males and 29 females, aged 50 +/- 4 with orlistat; 28 males and 30 females, aged 51 +/- 5 with sibutramine). All patients took antihypertensive therapy for at least 6 months before the study. We administered orlistat or sibutramine in a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study. We evaluated anthropometric variables, blood pressure and heart rate (HR) during 12 months of this treatment. A total of 113 completed the 4 weeks with controlled energy diet and were randomized to double-blind treatment with orlistat (n = 55) or sibutramine (n = 58). Significant body mass index (BMI) improvement was present after 6 (p < 0.05), 9 (p < 0.02), and 12 (p < 0.01) months in both groups, and body weight (BW) improvement was obtained after 9 (p < 0.05) and 12 (p < 0.02) months in both groups. Significant waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC) and waist/hip ratio (W/H ratio) improvement was observed after 12 months (p < 0.05, respectively) in both groups. Significant systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) improvement (p < 0.05) was present in orlistat group after 12 months. Lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides] reduction (p < 0.05, respectively) was observed in orlistat group and triglyceride reduction (p < 0.05) in sibutramine group after 12 months. No significant change was observed in sibutramine group during the study. No significant HR variation was obtained during the study in both groups. Of the 109 patients who completed the study, 48.1% of patients in the orlistat group and 17.5% of patients in the sibutramine group had side effects (p < 0.05 vs. orlistat group). Side-effect profiles were different in the two treatment groups. All orlistat side effects were gastrointestinal events. Sibutramine caused an increase in blood pressure (both SBP and DBP) in two patients, but it has been controlled by antihypertensive treatment. The vitamin changes were small and all mean vitamin and beta-carotene values stayed within reference ranges. No patients required vitamin supplementation. Both orlistat and sibutramine are effective on anthropometric variables during the 12-month treatment; in our sample, orlistat has been associated to a mild reduction in blood pressure, while sibutramine assumption has not be associated to any cardiovascular effect and was generically better tolerated than orlistat.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Endocrinol Metab
                IJEM
                Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
                2230-8210
                2230-9500
                Jan-Feb 2012
                : 16
                : 1
                : 146-147
                Affiliations
                [1] Department of Endocrinology, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
                [1 ] Department of Biochemistry, Hormone Assay Laboratory, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Dr. Panagiotis Anagnostis, Endocrinology Clinic, Hippokration Hospital, 49 Konstantinoupoleos Str, Thessaloniki, 54 642, Greece. E-mail: anagnwstis.pan@ 123456yahoo.gr
                Article
                IJEM-16-146
                10.4103/2230-8210.91214
                3263188
                22276270
                274f3dbb-3c7e-4cc7-9f42-e8eb113f4117
                Copyright: © Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Letters to the Editor

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article