7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Comparative Study on Adolescents’ Health Literacy in Europe: Findings from the HBSC Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          (1) Background: There is a need for studies on population-level health literacy (HL) to identify the current state of HL within and between countries. We report comparative findings from 10 European countries (Austria, Belgium (Fl), Czechia, England, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Macedonia, Poland, and Slovakia) on adolescents’ HL and its associations with gender, family affluence (FAS), and self-rated health (SRH). (2) Methods: Representative data (N = 14,590; age 15) were drawn from the HBSC (Health Behavior in School-Aged Children) study. The associations between HL, gender, FAS, and SRH were examined via path models. (3) Results: The countries exhibited differences in HL means and in the range of scores within countries. Positive associations were found between FAS and HL, and between HL and SRH in each country. Gender was associated with differences in HL in only three countries. HL acted as a mediator between gender and SRH in four countries, and between FAS and SRH in each country. (4) Conclusions: The findings confirm that there are differences in HL levels within and between European countries, and that HL does contribute to differences in SRH. HL should be taken into account when devising evidence-informed policies and interventions to promote the health of adolescents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review

          While socioeconomic disparities are among the most fundamental causes of health disparities, socioeconomic status (SES) does not impact health directly. One of the potential mediating factors that link SES and health is health literacy (HL). Yet although HL can be considered a modifiable risk factor of socioeconomic disparities in health, the relationship between SES, HL and health disparities is not well understood. This study reviewed the evidence regarding the mediating role of HL in the relationship between socioeconomic and health disparities. Medline, Cinahl, Embase, PsychInfo, Eric, Web of Science, Google, Google Scholar, Mednar, Doaj and Worldcat were used to retrieve studies that specifically addressed socioeconomic and socio-demographic factors related to low HL levels, as well as the mediating role of HL in the relationship between SES and disparities in health outcomes. Selected studies were assessed for methodological quality. Sixteen published studies were retained for inclusion and content analyzed using the constant comparison method. The review indicates that disadvantaged social and socioeconomic conditions contribute to low HL levels, whereby low SES, and particularly educational attainment, is the most important determinant of HL, and that HL mediates the relationship between SES and health status, quality of life, specific health-related outcomes, health behaviors and use of preventive services. HL can be considered as a modifiable risk factor of socioeconomic disparities in health. Enhancing the level of HL in the population or making health services more accessible to people with low HL may be a means to reach a greater equity in health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Perceived health and mortality: a nine-year follow-up of the human population laboratory cohort.

            The association between perceived health ratings ("excellent," "good," "fair," and "poor") and mortality was assessed using the 1965 Human Population Laboratory survey of a random sample of 6928 adults in Alameda County, California, and a subsequent nine-year follow-up. Risk of death during this period was significantly associated with perceived health rating in 1965. The age-adjusted relative risk for mortality from all causes for those who perceived their health as poor as compared to excellent was 2.33 for men and 5.10 for women. The association between level of perceived health and mortality persisted in multiple logistic analyses with controls for age, sex, 1965 physical health status, health practices, social network participation, income, education, health relative to age peers, anomy, morale, depression, and happiness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Psychometric Validation of the Revised Family Affluence Scale: a Latent Variable Approach

              The aim was to develop and test a brief revised version of the family affluence scale. A total of 7120 students from Denmark, Greenland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Scotland and Slovakia reported on a list of 16 potential indicators of affluence. Responses were subject to item screening and test of dimensionality. Bifactor analysis revealed a strong general factor of affluence in all countries, but with additional specific factors in all countries. The specific factors mainly reflected overlapping item content. Item screening was conducted to eliminate items with low discrimination and local dependence, reducing the number of items from sixteen to six: Number of computers, number of cars, own bedroom, holidays abroad, dishwasher, and bathroom. The six-item version was estimated with Samejima’s graded response model, and tested for differential item functioning by country. Three of the six items were invariant across countries, thus anchoring the scale to a common metric across countries. The six-item scale correlated with parental reported income groups in six out of eight countries. Findings support a revision to six items in the family affluence scale.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                19 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 17
                : 10
                : 3543
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Research Center for Health Promotion, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland; olli.paakkari@ 123456jyu.fi
                [2 ]Department of Teacher Education, University Of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland; minna.p.torppa@ 123456jyu.fi
                [3 ]Department of Humanization in Medicine and Sexology, Collegium Medicum University of Zielona Gora, and Institute of Mother and Child in Warsaw, 65-729 Zielona Góra, Poland; joanna.mazur@ 123456imid.med.pl
                [4 ]Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia; zuzana.boberova@ 123456upjs.sk
                [5 ]Institute of Sport Science, Education and Health Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany; gorden.sudeck@ 123456uni-tuebingen.de
                [6 ]Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University Olomouc, 779 00 Olomouc, Czechia; michal.kalman@ 123456upol.cz
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: leena.paakkari@ 123456jyu.fi
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-7230
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7051-7385
                Article
                ijerph-17-03543
                10.3390/ijerph17103543
                7277198
                32438595
                276ca74f-d8fa-4fa2-bec3-1de562e19a45
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 March 2020
                : 09 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                health literacy,adolescent,self-rated health,comparative study
                Public health
                health literacy, adolescent, self-rated health, comparative study

                Comments

                Comment on this article