16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of the three-line relaxation-based group intervention on mental stress management among nursing students

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To investigate the feasibility and efficiency of three-line relaxation-based group intervention on mental stress management among nursing students.

          Methods A total of 224 nursing students were randomly divided into the intervention group in which three-line relaxation training for 12 weeks were delivered together with psychological health education (PHE), and the control group which only delivered PHE. The Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used before and after intervention. T-test was used to compare inter-group difference.

          Results After 4-week intervention, there’ s no significant difference in the score of SAS and SDS between the two groups ( P>0.05). After 12-week intervention, average SAS and SDS score of intervention group was significantly decreased compared with before intervention (both P< 0.01). After 12-week intervention, no significant changes were observed in the score of SAS and SDS in the control group (both P>0.05). After 4- and 12-week intervention, average score in SAS and SDS of intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group P<0.05).

          Conclusion Three-line relaxation is effective in relieving mental stress of nursing students.

          Abstract

          【摘要】 目的 探讨三线放松疗法对缓解护生心理压力的有效性及可行性, 为改善护生心理健康状况提供参考。 方 法 将上海海军军医大学一年级 224 名护生随机分成两组, 对照组进行常规心理健康教育, 干预组在常规心理健康教育的 基础上进行为期 12 周的三线放松疗法训练。干预前后分别采用焦虑自评量表 (SAS) 和抑郁自评量表 (SDS)进行评定, 采 用 t 检验比较组间差异。 结果 干预后 4 周两组的焦虑抑郁得分与干预前差异均无统计学意义 ( P值均>0.05); 干预组在 12周时焦虑、抑郁得分低于干预前 ( t 值分别为 3.62, 2.84, P值均<0.05), 而对照组得分差异无统计学意义 ( t 值分别为 −0.54, −0.57, P值均>0.05)。干预 4 周、12 周时, 干预组的焦虑、抑郁得分均低于干预前 ( F值分别为 7.31, 0.23, P值均< 0.05), 对照组干预 4 周、12 周时, 焦虑、抑郁得分与干预前比较差异无统计学意义 ( P值均>0.05)。 结论 三线放松疗法对 缓解护生的心理压力作用显著, 值得推广。

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CJSH
          Chinese Journal of School Health
          Chinese Journal of School Health (China )
          1000-9817
          01 July 2020
          01 January 2020
          : 40
          : 7
          : 1040-1042
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Department of Health Service, Naval Medical University, Shanghai (200433), China
          Author notes
          *Corresponding author: SUN Jinhai, E-mail: sunjinhai2003@ 123456sina.cn
          Article
          j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.07.022
          10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2019.07.022
          276fb0b4-3c29-4e7d-87eb-9304b54ecffe
          © 2019 Chinese Journal of School Health

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

          Product
          Self URI (journal-page): http://www.cjsh.org.cn
          Categories
          Journal Article

          Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pediatrics,Nutrition & Dietetics,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
          Group processes,Pressure,Mental health,Students,Intervention studies

          Comments

          Comment on this article