99
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epidemiological time series studies of PM 2.5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Short-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter (particles with a median aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm (PM 2. 5)) air pollution has been associated with adverse health effects. Existing literature reviews have been limited in size and scope.

          Methods

          We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review and meta-analysis of 110 peer-reviewed time series studies indexed in medical databases to May 2011 to assess the evidence for associations between PM 2. 5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions for a range of diseases and ages. We stratified our analyses by geographical region to determine the consistency of the evidence worldwide and investigated small study bias.

          Results

          Based upon 23 estimates for all-cause mortality, a 10 µg/m 3 increment in PM 2. 5 was associated with a 1.04% (95% CI 0.52% to 1.56%) increase in the risk of death. Worldwide, there was substantial regional variation (0.25% to 2.08%). Associations for respiratory causes of death were larger than for cardiovascular causes, 1.51% (1.01% to 2.01%) vs 0.84% (0.41% to 1.28%). Positive associations with mortality for most other causes of death and for cardiovascular and respiratory hospital admissions were also observed. We found evidence for small study bias in single-city mortality studies and in multicity studies of cardiovascular disease.

          Conclusions

          The consistency of the evidence for adverse health effects of short-term exposure to PM 2. 5 across a range of important health outcomes and diseases supports policy measures to control PM 2. 5 concentrations. However, reasons for heterogeneity in effect estimates in different regions of the world require further investigation. Small study bias should also be considered in assessing and quantifying health risks from PM 2. 5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

          The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224-2260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Health effects of particulate air pollution: A review of epidemiological evidence.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Thorax
                Thorax
                thoraxjnl
                thorax
                Thorax
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0040-6376
                1468-3296
                July 2014
                4 April 2014
                : 69
                : 7
                : 660-665
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Population Health Research Institute and MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, St George's, University of London , London, UK
                [2 ]MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London , London, UK
                [3 ]Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards , Chilton, Oxfordshire, UK
                [4 ]NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr R W Atkinson, Population Health Research Institute and MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK; atkinson@ 123456sgul.ac.uk
                Article
                thoraxjnl-2013-204492
                10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204492
                4078677
                24706041
                277a6146-0684-4a5a-9ef9-f13f983083fb
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

                History
                : 11 September 2013
                : 28 February 2014
                : 6 March 2014
                Categories
                1506
                Respiratory Epidemiology
                Original article
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Surgery
                copd epidemiology,asthma epidemiology
                Surgery
                copd epidemiology, asthma epidemiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article