6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Demystifying the mist: Sources of microbial bioload in dental aerosols

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The risk of transmitting airborne pathogens is an important consideration in dentistry and has acquired special significance in the context of recent respiratory disease epidemics. The purpose of this review, therefore, is to examine (1) what is currently known regarding the physics of aerosol creation, (2) the types of environmental contaminants generated by dental procedures, (3) the nature, quantity, and sources of microbiota in these contaminants and (4) the risk of disease transmission from patients to dental healthcare workers. Most dental procedures that use ultrasonics, handpieces, air‐water syringes, and lasers generate sprays, a fraction of which are aerosolized. The vast heterogeneity in the types of airborne samples collected (spatter, settled aerosol, or harvested air), the presence and type of at‐source aerosol reduction methods (high‐volume evacuators, low volume suction, or none), the methods of microbial sampling (petri dishes with solid media, filter paper discs, air harvesters, and liquid transport media) and assessment of microbial bioload (growth conditions, time of growth, specificity of microbial characterization) are barriers to drawing robust conclusions. For example, although several studies have reported the presence of microorganisms in aerosols generated by ultrasonic scalers and high‐speed turbines, the specific types of organisms or their source is not as well studied. This paucity of data does not allow for definitive conclusions to be drawn regarding saliva as a major source of airborne microorganisms during aerosol generating dental procedures. Well‐controlled, large‐scale, multi center studies using atraumatic air harvesters, open‐ended methods for microbial characterization and integrated data modeling are urgently needed to characterize the microbial constituents of aerosols created during dental procedures and to estimate time and extent of spread of these infectious agents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The role of particle size in aerosolised pathogen transmission: A review

          Summary Understanding respiratory pathogen transmission is essential for public health measures aimed at reducing pathogen spread. Particle generation and size are key determinant for pathogen carriage, aerosolisation, and transmission. Production of infectious respiratory particles is dependent on the type and frequency of respiratory activity, type and site of infection and pathogen load. Further, relative humidity, particle aggregation and mucus properties influence expelled particle size and subsequent transmission. Review of 26 studies reporting particle sizes generated from breathing, coughing, sneezing and talking showed healthy individuals generate particles between 0.01 and 500 μm, and individuals with infections produce particles between 0.05 and 500 μm. This indicates that expelled particles carrying pathogens do not exclusively disperse by airborne or droplet transmission but avail of both methods simultaneously and current dichotomous infection control precautions should be updated to include measures to contain both modes of aerosolised transmission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises

            Summary The epidemics of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 highlighted both short- and long-range transmission routes, i.e. between infected patients and healthcare workers, and between distant locations. With other infections such as tuberculosis, measles and chickenpox, the concept of aerosol transmission is so well accepted that isolation of such patients is the norm. With current concerns about a possible approaching influenza pandemic, the control of transmission via infectious air has become more important. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the factors involved in: (1) the generation of an infectious aerosol, (2) the transmission of infectious droplets or droplet nuclei from this aerosol, and (3) the potential for inhalation of such droplets or droplet nuclei by a susceptible host. On this basis, recommendations are made to improve the control of aerosol-transmitted infections in hospitals as well as in the design and construction of future isolation facilities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ON AIR-BORNE INFECTION*

              W. Wells (1934)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kumar.83@osu.edu
                Journal
                J Periodontol
                J. Periodontol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1943-3670
                JPER
                Journal of Periodontology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0022-3492
                1943-3670
                27 July 2020
                : 10.1002/JPER.20-0395
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Periodontology College of Dentistry The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
                [ 2 ] Division of Pediatric Dentistry College of Dentistry The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Dr. Purnima S. Kumar, 4111, Postle Hall, 305 W 12 th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

                Email: kumar.83@ 123456osu.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-1341
                Article
                JPER10596
                10.1002/JPER.20-0395
                7405170
                32662070
                279e1e82-c765-4ead-82ea-839fad2e7c36
                © 2020 American Academy of Periodontology

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 22 May 2020
                : 22 June 2020
                : 23 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 10, Words: 7078
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.6 mode:remove_FC converted:05.08.2020

                evidence‐based dentistry,infection control,microbiology,saliva

                Comments

                Comment on this article