14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Geographic variation in nasal cavity form among three human groups from the Japanese Archipelago: Ecogeographic and functional implications : GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN NASAL CAVITY FORM

      1 , 2 , 2
      American Journal of Human Biology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Morphological Integration and Developmental Modularity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV- Coefficient

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution.

              This study addresses some enduring issues of ontogenetic and evolutionary integration in the form of the hominid cranium. Our sample consists of 38 crania: 20 modern adult Homo sapiens, 14 sub-adult H. sapiens, and four archaic Homo. All specimens were CT-scanned except for two infant H. sapiens, who were imaged by MR instead. For each specimen 84 landmarks and semi-landmarks were located on the midsagittal plane and converted to Procrustes shape coordinates. Integration was quantified by the method of singular warps, a new geometric-statistical approach to visualizing correlations among regions. The two classic patterns of integration, evolutionary and ontogenetic, were jointly explored by comparing analyses of overlapping subsamples that span ranges of different hypothetical factors. Evolutionary integration is expressed in the subsample of 24 adult Homo, and ontogenetic integration in the subsample of 34 H. sapiens. In this data set, vault, cranial base, and face show striking and localized patterns of covariation over ontogeny, similar but not identical to the patterns seen over evolution. The principal differences between ontogeny and phylogeny pertain to the cranial base. There is also a component of cranial length to height ratio not reducible to either process. Our methodology allows a separation of these independent processes (and their impact on cranial shape) that conventional methods have not found.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Human Biology
                Am. J. Hum. Biol.
                Wiley
                10420533
                May 2016
                May 2016
                September 08 2015
                : 28
                : 3
                : 343-351
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Human Evolution Studies, Graduate School of Medicine; Hokkaido University; Hokkaido 060-8638 Japan
                [2 ]Department of Human Biology and Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine; University of the Ryukyus; Okinawa 903-0215 Japan
                Article
                10.1002/ajhb.22786
                27a0d169-6f19-4210-82d4-0f49bfe34ebe
                © 2015

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article