6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment of the Effectiveness of Genetic Counseling by Telephone Compared to a Clinic Visit.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Maternal serum screening, also known as the triple screen, is used during pregnancy to assess the risk of carrying a fetus with specific chromosome abnormalities or open spina bifida. All women in British Columbia who screen positive are eligible for genetic counseling and are offered amniocentesis. The purpose of this study is to determine what differences (if any) exist in patients' understanding and/or anxiety when genetic counseling for a positive triple screen is conducted in person versus over the telephone. Each patient who participated was given the choice of having genetic counseling in person or over the telephone, this after a randomized design failed to elicit any participants. Using a written postcounseling questionnaire, each patient was assessed for her understanding of the information presented in the session, and her anxiety regarding her risk. In this small pilot study, no large differences were detected in patients' understanding or anxiety when genetic counseling was conducted by telephone versus in person.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Genet Couns
          Journal of genetic counseling
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1059-7700
          1059-7700
          Apr 2003
          : 12
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Medical Genetics Clinic, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, ksangha@cha.ab.ca.
          Article
          10.1023/A:1022663324006
          26140847
          27b60806-0f9f-416d-8f3a-02918210e9d4
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article