Sir,
In this article, we report a case of multiple abscesses in a patient with history
of malignancies and a recent resective colon surgery caused by two nutritionally demanding
anaerobic microorganisms. E. lenta is an anaerobic non-spore- forming gram-positive
bacilli belonging to the Eggerthellaceae family, which includes several bacteria commonly
found in the gut microbiota [1]. D. desulfuricans are obligate anaerobic, curved,
motile, sulphate-reducing, gram-negative bacilli and commensals of the gut microbiota,
belonging to the Desulfovibrionaceae family. This genus comprises more than 60 species,
however, only 6 have been isolated from human infections: Desulfovibrio desulfuricans,
Desulfovibrio fairfieldensis, Desulfovibrio vulgaris, Desulfovibrio piger, Desulfovibrio
legallii and Desulfovibrio intestinalis [2]. They are characterized by the presence
of a pigment, desulfoviridin, which fluoresces red at alkaline pH and blue-green at
acidic pH under long-wave-length ultraviolet light [3].
An 80-year-old woman with an ileostomy came to the emergency department with expulsion
of blood-purulent contents through an infraumbilical midline incision from a recent
colectomy surgery. Her medical history included an infiltrating ductal carcinoma of
the breast 9 years earlier treated by quadrantectomy, axillary emptying and a combination
of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and letrozole. Furthermore, she undergone an open colectomy
with resection up to the trans-verse colon, splenic angle and the descending colon
preserving the sigma due to complicated bowel obstruction one year ago. The patient
also suffered some years ago from a moderately differentiated intestinal adenocarcinoma
and poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma, being treated by total gastrectomy, chemo-therapy
and radiotherapy. At the physical examination, the patient was hypotense (85/52 mmHg),
eucardic (69 bpm) and afebrile (36.3ºC). A blood test showed an hemoglobin of 11.9
g/ dL, 450000 platelets (150,000-400,000), a hematocrit of 36%, normal renal and liver
function, INR (International normalized ratio) of 1.3 and elevated acute phase reactants
with C-reactive protein of 178 mg/L, 17000 leukocytes (4500-11000) with 91% neutrophils
and fibrinogen of 856 mg/dL. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed an overinfected
amphractuous pelvic collection (Figure 1A and B), extending from the intraperitoneal
space in Douglas’ cul-de-sac to the anterior extra-peritoneal space where there was
cutaneous fistulization, as well as an independent collection at the level of the
left perisigmoid. The patient was admitted for collection drainage by interventional
ultrasound, placing an anterior drainage catheter and aspirating 20 mL of purulent
material. However, the collection was not completely drained and a second drainage
tube was placed through the right posterior approach, aspirating another 20 ml. Two
peritoneal pig-tail tub drainages, 12 Fr in diameter and 25 cm in length, were used
for evacuating purulent contents of abscesses.
A sample was sent to the laboratory for microbiological analysis and two sets of blood
culture bottles were obtained. Finally, 250000 U of urokinase was administered and
4 g/0.5 g each 8 hours of IV piperacillin/tazobactam was prescribed. The sample was
inoculated in ThioglycollateR enrichment broth, chocolate agar, Columbia CNA agar,
tryptic soy agar (TSA) with 5% of sheep blood (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA),
Mac-Conkey agar, Brucella agar with Hemin and Vitamin K1 and Bacteroides bile esculin
(BBE) agar with amikacin. Thioglyco-lateR enrichment broth, chocolate agar, CNA agar
and TSA with 5% of sheep blood were incubated at 37°C under aerobic conditions with
7.5% CO2 for 96 h, McConeky agar at 37°C under aerobic conditions for 96 h, while
Brucella and BBE agars were incubated at 37°C under anaerobic conditions for 72 h.
Blood cultures bottles were incubated in the BDR BACTEC FX (Becton Dickinson, New
Jersey, USA), being negative after five days of incubation.
Figure 1
Abdominopelvic CT after contrast, axial image (A) and sagittal reconstruction (B)
where we observe pelvic collections/abscesses (white arrows) with fistulization towards
the straight abdominal musculature (yellow arrow). Axial (C) and sagittal (D) MIP
reconstructions after placement of pig-tail catheters for drainage of the collections
(white arrows).
Figure 2
A: growth of brightly, transparent and tiny colonies in Brucella agar identified as
Desulfovibrio desulfurican with MALDI-TOF MS. B: growth of yellowish and transparent
colonies identified as Eggerthella lenta with MALDI-TOF MS.
Gram staining of the sample showed 10-25 leukocytes/ field and no microorganisms.
Two different microorganisms grew on Brucella agar after 72 h (Figure 2), being identified
by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker, Massachusetts, USA) as Eggerthella lenta and
Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (Figure 2) with values of 2.16 and 2.33, respectively
(MALDI-TOF BiotyperR, MBT IVD, Library 9.0). The remaining culture media did not show
growth. A Gram staining was performed directly from the colonies of D. desulfuricans
in order to visualize its characteristic curved morphology. The antibiotic susceptibility
test was performed by gradient strips or MIC Test StripR (Liofilchem, Teramo, Italy)
on Brucella agar. Following CLSI breakpoints (M100, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial
Susceptibility Testing, 2022), E. lenta was susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic
acid (MIC = 0.064 mg/L), clindamycin (MIC= 0.016 mg/L) and metronidazole (MIC= 0.125
mg/L), while showing resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam (CMI = 32/4 mg/L). D. desulfuri-cans
showed low MICs to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (MIC = 0.125 mg/L), clindamycin (MIC=
0.064 mg/L) and metronidazole (MIC= 0.125 mg/L), being resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam
(MIC > 256 mg/L). According to CLSI recommendations, for both susceptibility study
methods (agar dilution and broth microdilution), Brucella agar and Brucella broth
must be used and supplemented with Hemin, vitamin K1 and laked sheep blood, being
incubated at 36ºC ± 1ºC under anaerobic conditions for 46-48 h (broth microdilution)
or 42-48 h (agar dilution). Antibiotic treatment was changed to 2 g/200 mg/8 h of
IV amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.
Five days later, a control CT scan was performed (Figures 1C and 1D) showing a reduction
of the pelvic collection. A small amount of fluid evacuated through the drainage tubes
was observed some days after, in which both E. lenta and D. desulfuricans were identified
again but with poor growth. The following blood tests showed a decrease in acute phase
reactants and the patient improved its condition. She was finally discharged after
13 days of antibiotics with close observation of the surgical drains in the following
two weeks with no treatment. The patient expired one month later after sudden worsening
of the general condition.
The spectrum of possible infections (both monomicrobial and polymicrobial) that can
be caused by these two growth fastidious microorganisms is yet to be determined due
to scarce case reports. The review of Wang J et al. describes how E. lenta can cause
local infections as abscesses or systemic infections such as bacteremia due to bacterial
translocation [4]. More specifically, it has been associated with infections such
as liver abscesses [4], pyomyositis [5] or bacteremia [6] in the context of multiple
abscesses [7], among others. D. desulfurin-cans has rarely been described in human
infections, however, it has been isolated causing bacteremia [8,9], liver abscesses
[10] or septic arthritis [11]. The risk factors found that predis-pose to infections
by these microorganisms are those related to immunosuppression (malignancy or diabetes),
gastrointestinal disease, as well as a history of trauma or previous surgery [5,8,11].
Since the growth of these microorganisms is slow and fastidious, their identification
in the past has been hindered by the limitations of biochemical methods or by the
scarce availability of molecular identification methods such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing
in most laboratories. D. desulfuricans may be identified by growth after sodium formate/sodium
fumarate stimulation, the production of different biochemical reactions such as nitrate,
urea, desulfoviridin or H2S (“Sulfur, Indole, Motility” or SIM culture) or its mobility
[2]. In the other hand, E. lenta does not ferment carbohydrates (the cells do not
hydro-lyze esculin, hippurate and gelatin), but it produces ammonia from arginine,
and H2O2 from agar medium containing 1% arginine [12]. Furthermore, E. lenta can produce
H2S in a triple sugar iron agar, but cannot produce it in SIM culture medium. However,
in recent years this has changed with the introduction of the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
into the routine of many laboratories. This accurate, inexpensive and accessible tool
has shortened the time needed to identify these bacteria compared to molecular methods
[5, 13].
Regarding the susceptibility of E. lenta, Bo J et al. [14] reviewed the antibiotic
susceptibility data of isolates between 2010 and 2020. E. lenta strains seem to be
susceptible to metronidazole, amoxicillin-clavulanate, carbapenems, vancomycin and
clindamycin, with high MICs in piperacillin/tazobactam and moxifloxacin in some strains.
The optimal treatment has not yet been established in D. desulfuricans; however, it
should be consider the possibility that this bacteria may produce beta-lactamases
[15]. It could be treated with metronidazole, clindamycin, chloramphenicol or carbapenems,
with variable MICs to piperacillin/tazobactam [8]. In our case, both micro-organisms
showed low in-vitro activity to piperacillin-tazobactam (empirical antibiotic treatment
prescribed in this case, then changed to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid), but he patient
improved its condition due to a proper drainage of the collections, which emphasized
how important focus control is in soft tissue and skin infections complicated with
abscesses. It should be noted that empiric piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy has
been associated with an increased mortality in patient with bacteremia caused by E.
lenta [16]. Therefore, piperacillin/ tazobactam monotherapy should be avoided as empiric
treatment in infections caused by both anaerobic microorganisms.
In addition to a correct antibiotic coverage guided by antimicrobial susceptibility,
control of the focus by drainage of associated collections is essential in most of
these infections [17]. The goal of source control is to eliminate the source of infection,
control ongoing contamination, and restore premorbid anatomy and function.