37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Building an EEG-fMRI Multi-Modal Brain Graph: A Concurrent EEG-fMRI Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The topological architecture of brain connectivity has been well-characterized by graph theory based analysis. However, previous studies have primarily built brain graphs based on a single modality of brain imaging data. Here we develop a framework to construct multi-modal brain graphs using concurrent EEG-fMRI data which are simultaneously collected during eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) resting states. FMRI data are decomposed into independent components with associated time courses by group independent component analysis (ICA). EEG time series are segmented, and then spectral power time courses are computed and averaged within 5 frequency bands (delta; theta; alpha; beta; low gamma). EEG-fMRI brain graphs, with EEG electrodes and fMRI brain components serving as nodes, are built by computing correlations within and between fMRI ICA time courses and EEG spectral power time courses. Dynamic EEG-fMRI graphs are built using a sliding window method, versus static ones treating the entire time course as stationary. In global level, static graph measures and properties of dynamic graph measures are different across frequency bands and are mainly showing higher values in eyes closed than eyes open. Nodal level graph measures of a few brain components are also showing higher values during eyes closed in specific frequency bands. Overall, these findings incorporate fMRI spatial localization and EEG frequency information which could not be obtained by examining only one modality. This work provides a new approach to examine EEG-fMRI associations within a graph theoretic framework with potential application to many topics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Modularity and community structure in networks

          M. Newman (2006)
          Many networks of interest in the sciences, including a variety of social and biological networks, are found to divide naturally into communities or modules. The problem of detecting and characterizing this community structure has attracted considerable recent attention. One of the most sensitive detection methods is optimization of the quality function known as "modularity" over the possible divisions of a network, but direct application of this method using, for instance, simulated annealing is computationally costly. Here we show that the modularity can be reformulated in terms of the eigenvectors of a new characteristic matrix for the network, which we call the modularity matrix, and that this reformulation leads to a spectral algorithm for community detection that returns results of better quality than competing methods in noticeably shorter running times. We demonstrate the algorithm with applications to several network data sets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Network modelling methods for FMRI.

            There is great interest in estimating brain "networks" from FMRI data. This is often attempted by identifying a set of functional "nodes" (e.g., spatial ROIs or ICA maps) and then conducting a connectivity analysis between the nodes, based on the FMRI timeseries associated with the nodes. Analysis methods range from very simple measures that consider just two nodes at a time (e.g., correlation between two nodes' timeseries) to sophisticated approaches that consider all nodes simultaneously and estimate one global network model (e.g., Bayes net models). Many different methods are being used in the literature, but almost none has been carefully validated or compared for use on FMRI timeseries data. In this work we generate rich, realistic simulated FMRI data for a wide range of underlying networks, experimental protocols and problematic confounds in the data, in order to compare different connectivity estimation approaches. Our results show that in general correlation-based approaches can be quite successful, methods based on higher-order statistics are less sensitive, and lag-based approaches perform very poorly. More specifically: there are several methods that can give high sensitivity to network connection detection on good quality FMRI data, in particular, partial correlation, regularised inverse covariance estimation and several Bayes net methods; however, accurate estimation of connection directionality is more difficult to achieve, though Patel's τ can be reasonably successful. With respect to the various confounds added to the data, the most striking result was that the use of functionally inaccurate ROIs (when defining the network nodes and extracting their associated timeseries) is extremely damaging to network estimation; hence, results derived from inappropriate ROI definition (such as via structural atlases) should be regarded with great caution. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain.

              Functional neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies have documented a dynamic baseline of intrinsic (not stimulus- or task-evoked) brain activity during resting wakefulness. This baseline is characterized by slow (<0.1 Hz) fluctuations of functional imaging signals that are topographically organized in discrete brain networks, and by much faster (1-80 Hz) electrical oscillations. To investigate the relationship between hemodynamic and electrical oscillations, we have adopted a completely data-driven approach that combines information from simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Using independent component analysis on the fMRI data, we identified six widely distributed resting state networks. The blood oxygenation level-dependent signal fluctuations associated with each network were correlated with the EEG power variations of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma rhythms. Each functional network was characterized by a specific electrophysiological signature that involved the combination of different brain rhythms. Moreover, the joint EEG/fMRI analysis afforded a finer physiological fractionation of brain networks in the resting human brain. This result supports for the first time in humans the coalescence of several brain rhythms within large-scale brain networks as suggested by biophysical studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                28 September 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 476
                Affiliations
                [1] 1The Mind Research Network Albuquerque, NM, USA
                [2] 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA
                [3] 3School of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China Taiyuan, China
                [4] 4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA
                [5] 5Life Science Research Center, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Xidian University Shanxi, China
                [6] 6Brainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China
                [7] 7Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center Hartford, CT, USA
                [8] 8Department of Psychiatry, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA
                [9] 9Department of Neurobiology, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Tetsuo Kida, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Japan

                Reviewed by: Tamer Demiralp, Istanbul University, Turkey; Marco Leite, University College London, UK; David Reutens, University College London (UCL), UK

                *Correspondence: Qingbao Yu qyu@ 123456mrn.org
                Vince D. Calhoun vcalhoun@ 123456unm.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2016.00476
                5039193
                27733821
                27da50f9-353e-4304-8d57-64580c891b76
                Copyright © 2016 Yu, Wu, Bridwell, Erhardt, Du, He, Chen, Liu, Sui, Pearlson and Calhoun.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 April 2016
                : 08 September 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 0, Equations: 8, References: 139, Pages: 17, Words: 11883
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R01 EB000840
                Award ID: 5P20RR021938/P20GM103472
                Award ID: R37 MH43775
                Funded by: Chinese Academy of Sciences 10.13039/501100002367
                Funded by: Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province 10.13039/501100004480
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                eeg-fmri,dynamic,multi-modal,brain graph,ica
                Neurosciences
                eeg-fmri, dynamic, multi-modal, brain graph, ica

                Comments

                Comment on this article