14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day 1, 2 despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect 3 . The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischemic injury 4, 5 . Here we examined the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and while heart function was enhanced, it was not associated with new cardiomyocyte production. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2 + and CX3CR1 + macrophages. Intra-cardiac injection of 2 distinct types of adult stem cells, freeze/thaw-killed cells or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response similarly induced regional CCR2 + and CX3CR1 + macrophage accumulation and provided functional rejuvenation to the I/R-injured heart. This selective macrophage response altered cardiac fibroblast activity, reduced border zone extracellular matrix (ECM) content, and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound healing response that rejuvenates the mechanical properties of the infarcted area of the heart.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration.

          The notion of the adult heart as terminally differentiated organ without self-renewal potential has been undermined by the existence of a subpopulation of replicating myocytes in normal and pathological states. The origin and significance of these cells has remained obscure for lack of a proper biological context. We report the existence of Lin(-) c-kit(POS) cells with the properties of cardiac stem cells. They are self-renewing, clonogenic, and multipotent, giving rise to myocytes, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells. When injected into an ischemic heart, these cells or their clonal progeny reconstitute well-differentiated myocardium, formed by blood-carrying new vessels and myocytes with the characteristics of young cells, encompassing approximately 70% of the ventricle. Thus, the adult heart, like the brain, is mainly composed of terminally differentiated cells, but is not a terminally differentiated organ because it contains stem cells supporting its regeneration. The existence of these cells opens new opportunities for myocardial repair.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            c-kit+ Cells Minimally Contribute Cardiomyocytes to the Heart

            If and how the heart regenerates after an injury event is highly debated. c-kit-expressing cardiac progenitor cells have been reported as the primary source for generation of new myocardium after injury. Here we generated two genetic approaches in mice to examine if endogenous c-kit+ cells contribute differentiated cardiomyocytes to the heart during development, with aging or after injury in adulthood. A cDNA encoding either Cre recombinase or a tamoxifen inducible MerCreMer chimeric protein was targeted to the Kit locus in mice and then bred with reporter lines to permanently mark cell lineage. Endogenous c-kit+ cells did produce new cardiomyocytes within the heart, although at a percentage of ≈0.03% or less, and if a preponderance towards cellular fusion is considered, the percentage falls below ≈0.008%. In contrast, c-kit+ cells amply generated cardiac endothelial cells. Thus, endogenous c-kit+ cells can generate cardiomyocytes within the heart, although likely at a functionally insignificant level.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Self-renewing resident cardiac macrophages limit adverse remodeling following myocardial infarction

              Macrophages promote both injury and repair following myocardial infarction, but discriminating functions within mixed populations remains challenging. Here we used fate mapping and single-cell transcriptomics to demonstrate that at steady state, TIMD4+LYVE1+MHC-IIloCCR2− resident cardiac macrophages self-renew with negligible blood monocyte input. Monocytes partially replaced resident TIMD4−LYVE1−MHC-IIhiCCR2− macrophages and fully replaced TIMD4−LYVE1−MHC-IIhiCCR2+ macrophages, revealing a hierarchy of monocyte contribution to functionally distinct macrophage subsets. Ischemic injury reduced TIMD4+ and TIMD4− resident macrophage abundance within infarcted tissue while recruited, CCR2+ monocyte-derived macrophages adopted multiple cell fates, including those nearly indistinguishable from resident macrophages. Despite this similarity, inducible depletion of resident macrophages using a Cx3cr1-based system led to impaired cardiac function and promoted adverse remodeling primarily within the peri-infarct zone, highlighting a non-redundant, cardioprotective role of resident cardiac macrophages. Lastly, we demonstrate the ability of TIMD4 to be used as a durable lineage marker of a subset of resident cardiac macrophages.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                11 November 2019
                27 November 2019
                January 2020
                27 May 2020
                : 577
                : 7790
                : 405-409
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Heart, Lung and Vascular Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
                [3 ]Center for Systems Biology, Department of Imaging, and Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [4 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence: Jeffery D. Molkentin, PhD, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, 240 Albert Sabin Way, MLC 7020, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA. jeff.molkentin@ 123456cchmc.org

                Author Contributions:

                J.D.M. and R.J.V. conceived the study. R.J.V., M.M., M.A.S., H.K., A.K.J., J.A.S., A.J.Y. and V.H. performed experiments and generated all the data shown in the manuscript. S.S. provided oversight and technical help along with J.A.S. in measuring myocardial scar mechanical properties. M.N. provided theoretical assessment of the project and advice in experimental design. J.D.M. and R.J.V interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.

                Article
                NIHMS1542543
                10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2
                6962570
                31775156
                28165a2b-8da3-4ad2-971e-83d146a47efa

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article