7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Devil Is in the Details: The Cascade Model of Invention Processes

      American Antiquity
      JSTOR

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          I propose that archaeologists, in pursuing a renewed interest in studying technological change, construct general theories and models of invention processes. As an example, this paper presents the “cascade” model for investigating invention processes in the context of “complex technological systems.” Building on the recognition that the vision of a new complex technological system is often obvious, the cascade model asserts that the hard work of invention takes place in a series of invention “cascades,” as people strive to achieve acceptable values of a new technology's core or critical performance characteristics during life-history processes (i.e., fashioning a prototype, replication or manufacture, use, and maintenance). The cascade model is illustrated by means of the nineteenth-century electromagnetic telegraph, and implications are drawn for studying invention processes in the complex technological systems of small-scale societies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Explanation of Artifact Variability

            We furnish a theoretical framework for explaining that portion of formal variability in artifacts attributable to the behavior of the artisan. Major causal factors are the artisan's knowledge and experience, extent of feedback on performance in activities along the artifact's behavioral chain, situational factors in behavioral chain activities, technological constraints, and social processes of conflict and negotiation. In identifying the causal factors at work in a specific case, the investigator must focus analytically on activities-that is, on people-people, people-artifact, and artifact-artifact interactions-and on the performance characteristics relevant to each. Application of this behavioral framework allows abandonment of many cherished but unhelpful concepts, including style and function. Ceramic artifacts, the low-fired, clay cooking pot in particular, are employed for illustrative purposes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                American Antiquity
                American Antiquity
                JSTOR
                0002-7316
                July 2005
                January 20 2017
                : 70
                : 03
                : 485-502
                Article
                10.2307/40035310
                28331e09-9f6e-4bb4-86a1-7b8edf90fc15
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article