9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion with 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

      The British Journal of Radiology

      Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angina Pectoris, physiopathology, radiography, ultrasonography, Chest Pain, Coronary Angiography, methods, Echocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Contraction, physiology, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Radiation Dosage, Reference Standards, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stroke Volume, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ventricular Function, Left

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to compare the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and regional wall motion using 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) with that using two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) in a heterogeneous patient population. In 126 patients with angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, chronic myocardial infarction, atypical chest pain without coronary artery disease or valvular heart disease, 64-slice MDCT was performed using retrospective electrocardiography gating without dose modulation. 20 phases of the cardiac cycle were analysed to identify the end-diastolic and end-systolic phases and to assess regional LV wall motion. For these measurements, 2D-TTE served as the reference standard. MDCT and 2D-TTE were performed within 10 days of each other. An excellent correlation between MDCT and 2D-TTE was shown for the evaluation of LVEF (59.2+/-11% vs 57.9+/-10%, respectively; r = 0.87). LVEF was slightly overestimated by MDCT, when compared with 2D-TTE, by an average of 1.4+/-5.6%. Good agreement was obtained between the use of the two techniques, with 94% of the segments scored identically on both modalities (kappa = 0.70). MDCT had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 82% when compared with 2D-TTE as the reference standard. In conclusion, the use of 64-slice MDCT can provide comparable results to those using 2D-TTE for LVEF and regional wall motion assessment in a heterogeneous population.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          19546180
          3487259
          10.1259/bjr/38829806

          Comments

          Comment on this article