17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Polygenic susceptibility to testicular cancer: implications for personalised health care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The increasing incidence of testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) combined with its strong heritable basis suggests that stratified screening for the early detection of TGCT may be clinically useful. We modelled the efficiency of such a personalised screening approach, based on genetic risk profiling in combination with other diagnostic tools.

          Methods:

          We compared the number of cases potentially detectable in the population under a number of screening models. The polygenic risk scoring (PRS) model was assumed to have a log-normal relative risk distribution across the 19 currently known TGCT susceptibility variants. The diagnostic performance of testicular biopsy and non-invasive semen analysis was also assessed, within a simulated combined screening programme.

          Results:

          The area under the curve for the TGCT PRS model was 0.72 with individuals in the top 1% of the PRS having a nine-fold increased TGCT risk compared with the population median. Results from population-screening simulations only achieved a maximal positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%, highlighting broader clinical factors that challenge such strategies, not least the rare nature of TGCT. In terms of future improvements, heritability estimates suggest that a significant number of additional genetic risk factors for TGCT remain to be discovered, identification of which would potentially yield improvement of the PPV to 80–90%.

          Conclusions:

          While personalised screening models may offer enhanced TGCT risk discrimination, presently the case for population-level testing is not compelling. However, future advances, such as more routine generation of whole genome data is likely to alter the landscape. More targeted screening programs may plausibly then offer clinical benefit, particularly given the significant survivorship issues associated with the successful treatment of TGCT.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Detecting epistasis in human complex traits.

          Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have become the focus of the statistical analysis of complex traits in humans, successfully shedding light on several aspects of genetic architecture and biological aetiology. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are usually modelled as having additive, cumulative and independent effects on the phenotype. Although evidently a useful approach, it is often argued that this is not a realistic biological model and that epistasis (that is, the statistical interaction between SNPs) should be included. The purpose of this Review is to summarize recent directions in methodology for detecting epistasis and to discuss evidence of the role of epistasis in human complex trait variation. We also discuss the relevance of epistasis in the context of GWASs and potential hazards in the interpretation of statistical interaction terms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Developmental model for the pathogenesis of testicular carcinoma in situ: genetic and environmental aspects.

            Carcinoma in situ testis (CIS), also known as intratubular germ cell neoplasia (ITGCN), is a pre-invasive precursor of testicular germ cell tumours, the commonest cancer type of male adolescents and young adults. In this review, evidence supporting the hypothesis of developmental origin of testicular germ cell cancer is summarized, and the current concepts regarding aetiology and pathogenesis of this disease are critically discussed. Comparative studies of cell surface proteins (e.g. PLAP and KIT), some of the germ cell-specific markers (e.g. MAGEA4, VASA, TSPY and NY-ESO-1), supported by studies of regulatory elements of the cell cycle (e.g. p53, CHK2 and p19-INK4d) demonstrated a close similarity of CIS to primordial germ cells and gonocytes, consistent with the pre-meiotic origin of CIS. Recent gene expression profiling studies showed that CIS cells closely resemble embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The abundance of factors associated with pluripotency (NANOG and OCT-3/4) and undifferentiated state (AP-2gamma) may explain the remarkable pluripotency of germ cell neoplasms, which are capable of differentiating to various somatic tissue components of teratomas. Impaired gonadal development resulting in the arrest of gonocyte differentiation and retention of its embryonic features, associated with an increasing genomic instability, is the most probable model for the pathogenesis of CIS. Genomic amplification of certain chromosomal regions, e.g. 12p, may facilitate survival of CIS and further invasive progression. Genetic studies, have so far not identified gene polymorphisms predisposing to the most common non-familial testicular cancer, but this research has only recently begun. Association of CIS with other disorders, such as congenital genital malformations and some forms of impaired spermatogenesis, all rising in incidence in a synchronous manner, led to the hypothesis that CIS might be a manifestation of testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS). The aetiology of TDS including testicular cancer remains to be elucidated, but epidemiological trends suggest a primary role for environmental factors, probably combined with genetic susceptibility.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Testicular germ-cell cancer.

              Testicular germ-cell tumours (TGCTs) represent the model of a curable malignancy; sensitive tumour markers, accurate prognostic classification, logical series of management trials, and high cure rates in both seminomas and non-seminomas have enabled a framework of effective cancer therapy. Understanding the molecular biology of TGCT could help improve treatment of other cancers. The typical presentation in young adults means that issues of long-term toxicity become especially important in judging appropriate management. A focus of recent developments has been to tailor aggressiveness of treatment to the severity of the prognosis. Recent changes affect the most common subtypes and include the reduction of chemotherapy for patients who have metastastic non-seminomas and a good prognosis, and alternatives to adjuvant radiotherapy in stage I seminomas. We summarise advances in the understanding and management of TGCT during the past decade.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                Br. J. Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                17 November 2015
                13 October 2015
                17 November 2015
                : 113
                : 10
                : 1512-1518
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research , London SW3 6JB, UK
                [2 ]Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research , London SW3 6JB, UK
                [3 ]Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research , London SW3 6JB, UK
                [4 ]Academic Radiotherapy Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research , London SW3 6JB, UK
                [5 ]Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [6 ]William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University , London EC1M 6BQ, UK
                Author notes
                Article
                bjc2015334
                10.1038/bjc.2015.334
                4815881
                26461055
                2871ea1d-2246-415d-b87e-de8c94a70915
                Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK

                This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 19 May 2015
                : 14 July 2015
                : 19 August 2015
                Categories
                Genetics & Genomics

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                testicular cancer,germ cell tumour,tgct,polygenic risk scoring,disease screening,gwas

                Comments

                Comment on this article