31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Assessment of current practice with a valid set of indicators is the key to successfully improving the quality of patient-centred care. For improvement purposes, we developed indicators of patient-centred cancer care and tested them on a population of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

          Methods

          Recommendations for patient-centred care were extracted from clinical guidelines, and patients were interviewed to develop indicators for assessing the patient-centredness of cancer care. These indicators were tested with regard to psychometric characteristics (room for improvement, applicability, discriminating capacity and reliability) on 132 patients with NSCLC treated in six hospitals in the east Netherlands. Data were collected from patients by means of questionnaires.

          Results

          Eight domains of patient-centred cancer care were extracted from 61 oncology guidelines and 37 patient interviews and were translated into 56 indicators. The practice test amongst patients with NSCLC showed the most room for improvement within the domains ‘emotional and psychosocial support’, ‘physical support’ and ‘information supply’. Overall, 26 of the 56 indicators had good psychometric characteristics.

          Conclusions

          Developing a valid set of patient-centred indicators is a first step towards improving the patient centredness of cancer care. Indicators can be based on recommendations from guidelines, but adding patient opinions leads to a more complete picture of patient centredness. The practice test on patients with NSCLC showed that the patient centredness of cancer care can be improved. Our set of indicators may also be useful for future quality assessments for other patients with cancers or chronic diseases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature.

          A 'patient-centred' approach is increasingly regarded as crucial for the delivery of high quality care by doctors. However, there is considerable ambiguity concerning the exact meaning of the term and the optimum method of measuring the process and outcomes of patient-centred care. This paper reviews the conceptual and empirical literature in order to develop a model of the various aspects of the doctor-patient relationship encompassed by the concept of 'patient-centredness' and to assess the advantages and disadvantages of alternative methods of measurement. Five conceptual dimensions are identified: biopsychosocial perspective; 'patient-as-person'; sharing power and responsibility; therapeutic alliance; and 'doctor-as-person'. Two main approaches to measurement are evaluated: self-report instruments and external observation methods. A number of recommendations concerning the measurement of patient-centredness are made.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care.

            To determine what aspects of healthcare provision are most likely to influence satisfaction with care and willingness to recommend hospital services to others and, secondly, to explore the extent to which satisfaction is a meaningful indicator of patient experience of healthcare services. Postal survey of a sample of patients who underwent a period of inpatient care. Patients were asked to evaluate their overall experience of this episode of care and to complete the Picker Inpatient Survey questionnaire on specific aspects of their care. Patients aged 18 and over presenting at five hospitals within one NHS trust in Scotland. 3592 questionnaires were mailed to patients' homes within 1 month of discharge from hospital during a 12 month period. Two reminders were sent to non-responders; 2249 (65%) questionnaires were returned. Almost 90% of respondents indicated that they were satisfied with their period of inpatient care. Age and overall self-assessed health were only weakly associated with satisfaction. A multiple linear regression indicated that the major determinants of patient satisfaction were physical comfort, emotional support, and respect for patient preferences. However, many patients who reported their satisfaction with the care they received also indicated problems with their inpatient care as measured on the Picker Inpatient Survey; 55% of respondents who rated their inpatient episode as "excellent" indicated problems on 10% of the issues measured on the Picker questionnaire. The evidence suggests that patient satisfaction scores present a limited and optimistic picture. Detailed questions about specific aspects of patients' experiences are likely to be more useful for monitoring the performance of various hospital departments and wards and could point to ways in which delivery of health care could be improved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer

              The aim of this paper is to describe and compare components of diagnostic delay (patient, primary care, referral, secondary care) for six cancers (breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma), and to compare delays in patients who saw their GP prior to diagnosis with those who did not. Secondary data analysis of The National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer was undertaken (65 192 patients). Breast cancer patients experienced the shortest total delays (mean 55.2 days), followed by lung (88.5), ovarian (90.3), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (102.8), colorectal (125.7) and prostate (148.5). Trends were similar for all components of delay. Compared with patient and primary care delays, referral delays and secondary care delays were much shorter. Patients who saw their GP prior to diagnosis experienced considerably longer total diagnostic delays than those who did not. There were significant differences in all components of delay between the six cancers. Reducing diagnostic delays with the intention of increasing the proportion of early stage cancers may improve cancer survival in the UK, which is poorer than most other European countries. Interventions aimed at reducing patient and primary care delays need to be developed and their effect on diagnostic stage and psychological distress evaluated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-243-613114 , +31-243-540166 , M.Ouwens@iq.umcn.nl
                Journal
                Support Care Cancer
                Supportive Care in Cancer
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0941-4355
                1433-7339
                23 April 2009
                January 2010
                : 18
                : 1
                : 121-130
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]East Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Pulmonology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, 114 IQ healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Article
                638
                10.1007/s00520-009-0638-y
                2778774
                19387693
                2891f81f-e4ab-46b4-b0c7-77ef4fe8506e
                © The Author(s) 2009
                History
                : 15 September 2008
                : 2 April 2009
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2010

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                oncology,patient-centred care,health care,quality indicators,cancer,quality of health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article