1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      An overview of the current management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: can we go beyond the GOLD recommendations?

      1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 3
      Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d154206e103">Treatment recommendations are based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, only about 1 in 20 people meet the inclusion criteria for RCTs forming consensus guidelines in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Consequently, the one-size-fits-all approach focused merely on traditional symptoms and risk of exacerbations is inadequate to treat COPD. COPD needs a personalized medicine strategy because of the relevance of COPD heterogeneity for subject-based health risk assessment and stratification in the clinical arena. Areas covered: Since the therapeutic approach proposed by the 2017 GOLD report takes no account of COPD heterogeneity, the advances with the current pharmacological options and the different approaches focused on phenotypes of COPD that can be used in an attempt to respond to unmet therapeutic needs are reviewed. Expert commentary: The one-size-fits-all approach that focuses solely on traditional symptoms and risk of exacerbations is inadequate to treat COPD. COPD needs a personalized medicine strategy because of the relevance of COPD heterogeneity. Phenotyping provides potential for a more personalized approach than the former model of care because it allows clustering patients defined by clinical characteristics and sharing common clinical outcomes. However, it is still too much of a simplistic method that, in any case, must be validated in future clinical studies. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence and outcomes of diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease in COPD.

            Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with important chronic comorbid diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and hypertension. The present study analysed data from 20,296 subjects aged > or =45 yrs at baseline in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). The sample was stratified based on baseline lung function data, according to modified Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Comorbid disease at baseline and death and hospitalisations over a 5-yr follow-up were then searched for. Lung function impairment was found to be associated with more comorbid disease. In logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, race, smoking, body mass index and education, subjects with GOLD stage 3 or 4 COPD had a higher prevalence of diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.9), hypertension (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9) and cardiovascular disease (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.9-3.0). Comorbid disease was associated with a higher risk of hospitalisation and mortality that was worse in people with impaired lung function. Lung function impairment is associated with a higher risk of comorbid disease, which contributes to a higher risk of adverse outcomes of mortality and hospitalisations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patient characteristics associated with medication adherence.

              Despite evidence indicating therapeutic benefit for adhering to a prescribed regimen, many patients do not take their medications as prescribed. Non-adherence often leads to morbidity and to higher health care costs. The objective of the study was to assess patient characteristics associated with medication adherence across eight diseases. Retrospective data from a repository within an integrated health system was used to identify patients ≥18 years of age with ICD-9-CM codes for primary or secondary diagnoses for any of eight conditions (depression, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, cancer, or osteoporosis). Electronic pharmacy data was then obtained for 128 medications used for treatment. Medication possession ratios (MPR) were calculated for those with one condition and one drug (n=15,334) and then for the total population having any of the eight diseases (n=31,636). The proportion of patients adherent (MPR ≥80%) was summarized by patient and living-area (census) characteristics. Bivariate associations between drug adherence and patient characteristics (age, sex, race, education, and comorbidity) were tested using contingency tables and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analysis examined predictors of adherence from patient and living area characteristics. Medication adherence for those with one condition was higher in males, Caucasians, older patients, and those living in areas with higher education rates and higher income. In the total population, adherence increased with lower comorbidity and increased number of medications. Substantial variation in adherence was found by condition with the lowest adherence for diabetes (51%) and asthma (33%). The expectation of high adherence due to a covered pharmacy benefit, and to enhanced medication access did not hold. Differences in medication adherence were found across condition and by patient characteristics. Great room for improvement remains, specifically for diabetes and asthma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
                Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
                Informa UK Limited
                1747-6348
                1747-6356
                November 2017
                January 02 2018
                November 03 2017
                January 02 2018
                : 12
                : 1
                : 43-54
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Systems Medicine, Chair of Respiratory Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
                [2 ] Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
                [3 ] Department of Experimental Medicine, Unit of Pharmacology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
                Article
                10.1080/17476348.2018.1398086
                29082808
                28a2e99b-30a7-4578-adbc-0adb51326b42
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article