37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stillbirths and quality of care during labour at the low resource referral hospital of Zanzibar: a case-control study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To study determinants of stillbirths as indicators of quality of care during labour in an East African low resource referral hospital.

          Methods

          A criterion-based unmatched unblinded case-control study of singleton stillbirths with birthweight ≥2000 g ( n = 139), compared to controls with birthweight ≥2000 g and Apgar score ≥7 ( n = 249).

          Results

          The overall facility-based stillbirth rate was 59 per 1000 total births, of which 25 % was not reported in the hospital’s registers. The majority of singletons had birthweight ≥2000 g ( n = 139; 79 %), and foetal heart rate was present on admission in 72 (52 %) of these (intra-hospital stillbirths). Overall, poor quality of care during labour was the prevailing determinant of 71 (99 %) intra-hospital stillbirths, and median time from last foetal heart assessment till diagnosis of foetal death or delivery was 210 min. (interquartile range: 75–315 min.). Of intra-hospital stillbirths, 26 (36 %) received oxytocin augmentation (23 % among controls; odds ratio (OR) 1.86, 95 % confidential interval (CI) 1.06–3.27); 15 (58 %) on doubtful indication where either labour progress was normal or less dangerous interventions could have been effective, e.g. rupture of membranes. Substandard management of prolonged labour frequently led to unnecessary caesarean sections. The caesarean section rate among all stillbirths was 26 % (11 % among controls; OR 2.94, 95 % CI 1.68–5.14), and vacuum extraction was hardly ever done. Of women experiencing stillbirth, 27 (19 %) had severe hypertensive disorders (4 % among controls; OR 5.76, 95 % CI 2.70–12.31), but 18 (67 %) of these did not receive antihypertensives. An additional 33 (24 %) did not have blood pressure recorded during active labour. When compared to controls, stillbirths were characterized by longer admissions during labour. However, substandard care was prevalent in both cases and controls and caused potential risks for the entire population. Notably, women with foetal death on admission were in the biggest danger of neglect.

          Conclusions

          Intrapartum management of women experiencing stillbirth was a simple yet strong indicator of quality of care. Substandard care led to perinatal as well as maternal risks, which furthermore were related to unnecessary complex, time consuming, and costly interventions. Improvement of obstetric care is warranted to end preventable birth-related deaths and disabilities.

          Trial registration

          This is the baseline analysis of the PartoMa trial, which is registered on ClinicalTrials.org ( NCT02318420, 4th November 2014).

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1142-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study.

          To assess the risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery. Prospective cohort study within the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health. 410 health facilities in 24 areas in eight randomly selected Latin American countries; 123 were randomly selected and 120 participated and provided data 106,546 deliveries reported during the three month study period, with data available for 97,095 (91% coverage). Maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with intrapartum or elective caesarean delivery, adjusted for clinical, demographic, pregnancy, and institutional characteristics. Women undergoing caesarean delivery had an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with women undergoing vaginal delivery (odds ratio 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.5) for intrapartum caesarean and 2.3 (1.7 to 3.1) for elective caesarean). The risk of antibiotic treatment after delivery for women having either type of caesarean was five times that of women having vaginal deliveries. With cephalic presentation, there was a trend towards a reduced odds ratio for fetal death with elective caesarean, after adjustment for possible confounding variables and gestational age (0.7, 0.4 to 1.0). With breech presentation, caesarean delivery had a large protective effect for fetal death. With cephalic presentation, however, independent of possible confounding variables and gestational age, intrapartum and elective caesarean increased the risk for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care (2.1 (1.8 to 2.6) and 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3), respectively) and the risk of neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge (1.7 (1.3 to 2.2) and 1.9 (1.5 to 2.6), respectively), which remained higher even after exclusion of all caesarean deliveries for fetal distress. Such increased risk was not seen for breech presentation. Lack of labour was a risk factor for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge for babies delivered by elective caesarean delivery, but rupturing of membranes may be protective. Caesarean delivery independently reduces overall risk in breech presentations and risk of intrapartum fetal death in cephalic presentations but increases the risk of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in cephalic presentations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tanzania's countdown to 2015: an analysis of two decades of progress and gaps for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, to inform priorities for post-2015.

              Tanzania is on track to meet Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 for child survival, but is making insufficient progress for newborn survival and maternal health (MDG 5) and family planning. To understand this mixed progress and to identify priorities for the post-2015 era, Tanzania was selected as a Countdown to 2015 case study.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nannamaaloe@outlook.com
                natasha.housseine@outlook.com
                iby@sund.ku.dk
                tarekmeguid@gmail.com
                rasakha@yahoo.com
                el.kilfyman@yahoo.com
                birgitte.bruun.nielsen@dadlnet.dk
                j.j.m.van_roosmalen@lumc.nl
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                10 November 2016
                10 November 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 351
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 9, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
                [2 ]Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar, Tanzania
                [3 ]Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]School of Health & Medical Sciences, State University of Zanzibar, P.O.Box:146, Zanzibar, Tanzania
                [5 ]Department of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
                [6 ]Athena Institute, VU University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-1277
                Article
                1142
                10.1186/s12884-016-1142-2
                5103376
                27832753
                28ab1a81-f711-41ee-8e3a-f54db66d3f27
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 28 June 2016
                : 1 November 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003554, Lundbeckfonden;
                Award ID: R164-2013-16038
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004102, Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine;
                Award ID: 40108
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004954, Augustinus Fonden;
                Award ID: 14-1059
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                tanzania,low resource,stillbirths,labour,quality of care,partoma,caesarean section,severe hypertensive disorders,oxytocin,criterion-based audit,case-control study,guidelines,partograph

                Comments

                Comment on this article