14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intraoperative dexmedetomidine attenuates postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been reported to attenuate inflammation in rats. The present retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether intraoperative administration with DEX could reduce the incidence of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in patients following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

          Patients and methods

          A total of 251 patients were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 175 received intravenous DEX infusion during the intraoperative period and 76 did not. The primary outcome measures were the incidences of postoperative SIRS and fever. Secondary outcomes included patient-controlled analgesia (tramadol) requirements, length of postoperative hospitalization stay, serum creatinine (Scr) and serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration, and adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension, renal artery thrombosis).

          Results

          Administration of DEX not only significantly attenuated the incidence of SIRS and fever ( P=0.029, P=0.042, respectively), but also reduced analgesia requirements ( P=0.028). The length of postoperative hospitalization stay, Scr and BUN concentration, and adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Further univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that intraoperative DEX administration was a protective factor against SIRS after PCNL (OR 0.476 [95% CI: 0.257–0.835]; P=0.019).

          Conclusion

          Intraoperative administration of DEX might be associated with reductions in the incidences of SIRS and fever after PCNL.

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

          This review focuses on a step-by-step approach to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and its complications and management. Based on institutional and personal experience with >1000 patients treated by PNL, we reviewed the literature (Pubmed search) focusing on technique, type, and incidence of complications of the procedure. Complications during or after PNL may be present with an overall complication rate of up to 83%, including extravasation (7.2%), transfusion (11.2-17.5%), and fever (21.0-32.1%), whereas major complications, such as septicaemia (0.3-4.7%) and colonic (0.2-0.8%) or pleural injury (0.0-3.1%) are rare. Comorbidity (i.e., renal insufficiency, diabetes, gross obesity, pulmonary disease) increases the risk of complications. Most complications (i.e., bleeding, extravasation, fever) can be managed conservatively or minimally invasively (i.e., pleural drain, superselective renal embolisation) if recognised early. The most important consideration for achieving consistently successful outcomes in PNL with minimal major complications is the correct selection of patients. A well-standardised technique and postoperative follow-up are mandatory for early detection of complications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.

            To assess the current indications, perioperative morbidity, and stone-free outcomes for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) worldwide. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) collected prospective data for consecutive patients who were treated with PCNL at centers around the world for 1 year. PCNL was performed according to study protocol and local clinical practice guidelines. Stone load and location were recorded, and postoperative complications were graded according to the modified Clavien grading system. Between November 2007 and December 2009, 5803 patients were treated at 96 centers in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, and Australia. Staghorn calculus was present in 1466 (27.5%) patients, and 940, 956, and 2603 patients had stones in the upper, interpolar, and lower pole calices, respectively. The majority of procedures (85.5%) were uneventful. Major procedure-related complications included significant bleeding (7.8%), renal pelvis perforation (3.4%), and hydrothorax (1.8%). Blood transfusion was administered in 328 (5.7%) patients, and fever >38.5°C occurred in 10.5% of patients. The distribution of scores in modified Clavien grades was: No complication (79.5%), I (11.1%), II (5.3%), IIIa (2.3%), IIIb (1.3%), IVa (0.3%), IVb (0.2%), or V (0.03%). At follow-up. the 30-day stone-free rate was 75.7%, and 84.5% of patients did not need additional treatment. With a high success rate and a low major complication rate, PCNL is an effective and safe technique overall for minimally invasive removal of kidney stones.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis.

              Antimicrobial prophylaxis is the periprocedural systemic administration of an antimicrobial agent intended to reduce the risk of postprocedural local and systemic infections. The AUA convened a BPP Panel to formulate recommendations on the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis during urologic surgery. Recommendations are based on a review of the literature and the Panel members' expert opinions. The potential benefit of antimicrobial prophylaxis is determined by patient factors, procedure factors, and the potential morbidity of infection. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended only when the potential benefit outweighs the risks and anticipated costs (including expense of agent and administration, risk of allergic reactions or other adverse effects, and induction of bacterial resistance). The prophylactic agent should be effective against organisms characteristic of the operative site. Cost, convenience, and safety of the agent also should be considered. The duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis should extend throughout the period when bacterial invasion is facilitated and/or likely to establish an infection. Prophylaxis should begin within 60 minutes of the surgical incision (120 minutes for intravenous fluoroquinolines and vancomycin) and generally should be discontinued within 24 hours. The AHA no longer recommends antimicrobial prophylaxis for genitourinary surgery solely to prevent infectious endocarditis. Justifications and recommendations for specific antimicrobial prophylactic regimens for specific categories of urologic procedures are provided. The recommendations provided in this document, including specific indications and agents enumerated in the Tables, can assist urologists in the appropriate use of periprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ther Clin Risk Manag
                Ther Clin Risk Manag
                Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
                Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
                Dove Medical Press
                1176-6336
                1178-203X
                2018
                14 February 2018
                : 14
                : 287-293
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                [4 ]Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Shaoli Zhou; Zhuang-Gui Chen, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou 510360, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 136 1027 2308; +86 020 8525 3380, Email shaolizhou@ 123456139.com ; chenzhuanggui@ 123456126.com
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                tcrm-14-287
                10.2147/TCRM.S157320
                5818878
                28c49d51-fd7c-4ab7-b380-cb849a011307
                © 2018 Tan et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Medicine
                pcnl,sirs,risk factor,dexmedetomidine
                Medicine
                pcnl, sirs, risk factor, dexmedetomidine

                Comments

                Comment on this article