1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      6ER-010 Focus on hcv treatment based on second-generation direct-acting antiviral agents (daas-2): comparing national and local prescribing trends

      meeting-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Since the beginning of 2014, an increasing number of second-generation direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have been approved in Italy for treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) improving patients’ perspectives and increasing treatment outcomes. In order to achieve high-quality treatment with these costly drugs, DAA-2 prescriptions are subject to strict rules (specific drug for specific patient characteristics and virus genotype) and intense monitoring.

          Purpose

          The aim of the work was to compare national 1 and local prescribing trends.

          Material and methods

          Local electronic monitoring prescriptions of DAA-2 made from January 2015 to February 2017 were extracted from the national monitoring prescriptions database. The number of prescriptions for each DAA-2 was extracted. Qualitative and quantitative presentation of local data were adapted in order to make them comparable to available national data. Both local and national monthly average drug prescription for each DAA-2 was assessed, considering the number of months of commercialisation of each DAA-2. Local and national prescribing trends were assessed and compared.

          Results

          1026 electronic local monitoring prescriptions were analysed. Treatments were: sofosbuvir (31.3%), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (20.9%), ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (25.9%–20.4% in monotherapy; 5.5% in association with dasabuvir), daclatasvir (15%) and simeprevir (6.9%). The national and local monthly average of prescriptions was respectively: 345 and 12 (sofosbuvir), 1084 and 10 (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir), 680 and 7 (sofosbuvir/daclatasvir), 303 and 3 (simeprevir), 615 and 13 (ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir-dasabuvir). National prescribing trend (listed in ascending order) was: simeprevir, sofosbuvir, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir-dasabuvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. Differently, the local prescribing trend (listed in ascending order) was: simeprevir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and sofosbuvir, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir-dasabuvir.

          Conclusion

          The comparison between local and national prescribing trends have shown differences: ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir-dasabuvir are the most prescribed therapies respectively in the national and local context. These differences could be justified by population differences, however, a detailed study of the local patient population is needed to confirm genotype and patient population as the only influencing factors for discrepancies.

          References and/or Acknowledgements

          1. WEF-E 2017‘Aggiornamento sui dati nazionali di prescrizione dei DAAs dai registri AIFA’ Simona Montilla

          No conflict of interest

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Eur J Hosp Pharm
          Eur J Hosp Pharm
          ejhpharm
          ejhpharm
          European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
          BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
          2047-9956
          2047-9964
          2018
          2 March 2018
          : 25
          : Suppl 1 , Abstract Book, 23rd EAHP Congress, 21st–23rd March 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden
          : A234
          Affiliations
          ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco – L. Sacco Hospital, Pharmacy, Milan, Italy
          Article
          PMC7535159 PMC7535159 7535159 ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.503
          10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.503
          7535159
          28de74fa-49cf-451f-82e7-025f07ddae2e
          © 2018, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
          History
          Categories
          Section 6: Education and research

          Comments

          Comment on this article