1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Factors Associated With Being Unaware of Having Diabetes

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An improved understanding of which groups are more likely to be unaware of their diabetes may lead to more efficient screening, improved awareness, and overall better treatment for diabetes. Our objective was to investigate factors associated with being unaware of having diabetes among adults with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes. The 2011–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a stratified, multistage probability survey representative of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population (1). Data were collected during an in-home interview and a visit to a mobile examination center. We used data from 1,879 participants with either diagnosed or undiagnosed diabetes (based on a single measurement of A1C, fasting plasma glucose, or 2-h plasma glucose). Using logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios of being unaware of diabetes associated with age, race/ethnicity, sex, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), family history of diabetes, education, household income, smoking status, BMI, work-time activity, leisure-time activity, no health insurance, location of routine health care, no health care in the past year, hospitalization in the past year, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Initial models were unadjusted and subsequent models adjusted for all other variables. We repeated the analysis stratified by sex. Appropriate sample weights were used so that the sum added to the total civilian noninstitutionalized U.S. population (2). Overall, 34.3% were unaware of their diabetes. In unadjusted models, compared with people aged 20–44 years, participants aged 45–64 years had 34% lower odds of being unaware of their diabetes (Table 1). Compared with non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic Asians had 75% higher odds and Hispanics of non–Mexican American descent had 69% higher odds of being unaware. In addition, a family history of diabetes, hospitalization in the past year, hypertension, health insurance, routine place for health care, and health care in the past year were associated with awareness. After adjustment, people with a family history of diabetes had about half the odds of being unaware, people who did not receive health care in the past year had approximately a sixfold higher odds of being unaware, and people who were hospitalized in the past year had one-third lower odds of being unaware. Table 1 Odds ratios (95% CI) of being unaware of having diabetes among people with diabetes, U.S., 2011–2014 Unadjusted Adjusted† Overall Overall Men Women Age  20–44 years Reference Reference Reference Reference  45–64 years 0.66 (0.45–0.97) 0.76 (0.51–1.13) 1.02 (0.55–1.89) 0.53 (0.27–1.05)  ≥65 years 0.70 (0.48–1.01) 0.99 (0.68–1.44) 0.92 (0.51–1.67) 1.17 (0.63–2.18) Race/ethnicity  Non-Hispanic white Reference Reference Reference Reference  Non-Hispanic black 0.86 (0.56–1.32) 1.11 (0.75–1.64) 0.93 (0.51–1.70) 1.46 (0.85–2.49)  Non-Hispanic Asian 1.74 (1.18–2.58) 1.44 (0.82–2.54) 1.52 (0.66–3.49) 1.72 (0.68–4.39)  Mexican American 1.23 (0.86–1.76) 1.06 (0.73–1.53) 0.62 (0.34–1.11) 1.91 (1.09–3.34)  Other Hispanic 1.69 (1.08–2.62) 1.30 (0.78–2.14) 0.96 (0.40–2.30) 2.21 (1.12–4.34) Sex and GDM status  Women without GDM Reference Reference — Reference  Women with GDM 1.02 (0.68–1.51) 1.06 (0.68–1.65) — 1.04 (0.65–1.65)  Men 1.23 (0.84–1.79) 1.07 (0.71–1.61) — — Family history of diabetes 0.53 (0.39–0.72) 0.48 (0.33–0.70) 0.43 (0.25–0.76) 0.53 (0.32–0.88) Education  Greater than high school education Reference Reference Reference Reference  High school education 0.99 (0.66–1.48) 1.07 (0.65–1.78) 0.85 (0.40–1.82) 1.17 (0.63–2.18)  Less than high school education 1.02 (0.67–1.57) 0.98 (0.56–1.70) 1.23 (0.59–2.57) 0.65 (0.34–1.26) Household income <$20,000 0.84 (0.62–1.14) 0.88 (0.65–1.21) 1.05 (0.67–1.65) 0.85 (0.50–1.45) Smoking status  Never smokers Reference Reference Reference Reference  Former smokers 0.97 (0.71–1.31) 0.96 (0.63–1.46) 1.06 (0.60–1.87) 0.82 (0.39–1.71)  Current smokers 0.84 (0.60–1.17) 0.75 (0.51–1.12) 0.63 (0.37–1.08) 1.09 (0.49–2.44) BMI  <25 kg/m2 Reference Reference Reference Reference  25–29.9 kg/m2 1.15 (0.79–1.67) 1.17 (0.66–2.07) 2.56 (1.23–5.30) 0.53 (0.24–1.21)  30–34.9 kg/m2 0.90 (0.52–1.56) 0.95 (0.45–1.99) 2.04 (0.69–6.03) 0.49 (0.18–1.31)  ≥35 kg/m2 0.70 (0.43–1.15) 0.77 (0.39–1.53) 1.52 (0.53–4.35) 0.47 (0.21–1.05) Low work-time activity levels 0.86 (0.59–1.23) 0.74 (0.48–1.12) 0.66 (0.39–1.14) 0.77 (0.44–1.34) Low leisure-time activity levels 1.03 (0.74–1.43) 1.13 (0.78–1.64) 0.99 (0.58–1.68) 1.43 (0.85–2.40) No health insurance 1.79 (1.29–2.48) 1.25 (0.74–2.11) 1.21 (0.64–2.27) 1.32 (0.61–2.83) Routine health care location  Health care at doctor’s office or HMO Reference Reference Reference Reference  Other place for health care 0.90 (0.61–1.34) 0.68 (0.41–1.11) 0.82 (0.48–1.40) 0.51 (0.30–0.90)  No routine place for health care 2.61 (1.68–4.05) 0.79 (0.43–1.47) 1.00 (0.52–1.89) 0.89 (0.29–2.73) No health care in the past year 5.88 (3.47–9.99) 5.85 (2.39–14.34) 5.12 (1.54–17.06) 7.03 (2.67–18.51) Hospitalized in the past year 0.54 (0.41–0.73) 0.66 (0.44–0.99) 0.57 (0.26–1.27) 0.67 (0.38–1.17) Hypertension 0.68 (0.51–0.91) 0.74 (0.53–1.02) 0.66 (0.39–1.12) 0.78 (0.46–1.30) Hyperlipidemia 0.81 (0.57–1.14) 0.80 (0.51–1.24) 0.96 (0.57–1.63) 0.65 (0.34–1.24) HMO, health maintenance organization. † Adjusted for all other variables listed in the table. Odds ratios in boldface type are statistically significant at P < 0.05. Among men, having a family history of diabetes, having a BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2, and receiving no health care in the past year were associated with being unaware after adjustment. Among women, being of Mexican American or other Hispanic descent, having a family history of diabetes, receiving routine health care other than at a doctor’s office, and receiving no health care in the past year were associated with being unaware after adjustment. Overall, approximately one-third of people with diabetes were undiagnosed/unaware of it. Non-Hispanic Asians and Hispanics of non–Mexican American descent were more likely to be unaware in unadjusted models but not after adjustment. In adjusted models, those with a family history of diabetes and those who had been hospitalized in the past year were less likely to be unaware, while those who received no health care in the past year were more likely to be unaware. Results were generally consistent when stratified by sex except that Mexican American and other Hispanic women were more likely to be unaware of their diabetes. Some participants may have been misclassified, as a repeat measurement is recommended by the American Diabetes Association after a single positive test based on A1C, fasting plasma glucose, or 2-h plasma glucose; however, the NHANES only includes one study visit. Also, since participants self-reported many of the variables in our analysis, there may be inaccuracies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Estimation Procedures, 2007–2010

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Diabetes Care
            Diabetes Care
            diacare
            dcare
            Diabetes Care
            Diabetes Care
            American Diabetes Association
            0149-5992
            1935-5548
            May 2017
            13 March 2017
            : 40
            : 5
            : e55-e56
            Affiliations
            [1] 1Social & Scientific Systems, Silver Spring, MD
            [2] 2Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
            [3] 3National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
            Author notes
            Corresponding author: Andy Menke, amenke@ 123456s-3.com .
            Author information
            http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0729-7161
            Article
            2626
            10.2337/dc16-2626
            5399654
            28289042
            29047f87-8df8-492a-ad55-2d5632f1c621
            © 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.

            Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

            History
            : 8 December 2016
            : 11 February 2017
            Page count
            Pages: 2
            Categories
            e-Letters: Observations

            Endocrinology & Diabetes
            Endocrinology & Diabetes

            Comments

            Comment on this article