13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using stochastic language models (SLM) to map lexical, syntactic, and phonological information processing in the brain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Language comprehension involves the simultaneous processing of information at the phonological, syntactic, and lexical level. We track these three distinct streams of information in the brain by using stochastic measures derived from computational language models to detect neural correlates of phoneme, part-of-speech, and word processing in an fMRI experiment. Probabilistic language models have proven to be useful tools for studying how language is processed as a sequence of symbols unfolding in time. Conditional probabilities between sequences of words are at the basis of probabilistic measures such as surprisal and perplexity which have been successfully used as predictors of several behavioural and neural correlates of sentence processing. Here we computed perplexity from sequences of words and their parts of speech, and their phonemic transcriptions. Brain activity time-locked to each word is regressed on the three model-derived measures. We observe that the brain keeps track of the statistical structure of lexical, syntactic and phonological information in distinct areas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing.

          The advent of functional neuroimaging has allowed tremendous advances in our understanding of brain-language relationships, in addition to generating substantial empirical data on this subject in the form of thousands of activation peak coordinates reported in a decade of language studies. We performed a large-scale meta-analysis of this literature, aimed at defining the composition of the phonological, semantic, and sentence processing networks in the frontal, temporal, and inferior parietal regions of the left cerebral hemisphere. For each of these language components, activation peaks issued from relevant component-specific contrasts were submitted to a spatial clustering algorithm, which gathered activation peaks on the basis of their relative distance in the MNI space. From a sample of 730 activation peaks extracted from 129 scientific reports selected among 260, we isolated 30 activation clusters, defining the functional fields constituting three distributed networks of frontal and temporal areas and revealing the functional organization of the left hemisphere for language. The functional role of each activation cluster is discussed based on the nature of the tasks in which it was involved. This meta-analysis sheds light on several contemporary issues, notably on the fine-scale functional architecture of the inferior frontal gyrus for phonological and semantic processing, the evidence for an elementary audio-motor loop involved in both comprehension and production of syllables including the primary auditory areas and the motor mouth area, evidence of areas of overlap between phonological and semantic processing, in particular at the location of the selective human voice area that was the seat of partial overlap of the three language components, the evidence of a cortical area in the pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus dedicated to syntactic processing and in the posterior part of the superior temporal gyrus a region selectively activated by sentence and text processing, and the hypothesis that different working memory perception-actions loops are identifiable for the different language components. These results argue for large-scale architecture networks rather than modular organization of language in the left hemisphere.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences.

            Linguistic analyses suggest that sentences are not mere strings of words but possess a hierarchical structure with constituents nested inside each other. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to search for the cerebral mechanisms of this theoretical construct. We hypothesized that the neural assembly that encodes a constituent grows with its size, which can be approximately indexed by the number of words it encompasses. We therefore searched for brain regions where activation increased parametrically with the size of linguistic constituents, in response to a visual stream always comprising 12 written words or pseudowords. The results isolated a network of left-hemispheric regions that could be dissociated into two major subsets. Inferior frontal and posterior temporal regions showed constituent size effects regardless of whether actual content words were present or were replaced by pseudowords (jabberwocky stimuli). This observation suggests that these areas operate autonomously of other language areas and can extract abstract syntactic frames based on function words and morphological information alone. On the other hand, regions in the temporal pole, anterior superior temporal sulcus and temporo-parietal junction showed constituent size effect only in the presence of lexico-semantic information, suggesting that they may encode semantic constituents. In several inferior frontal and superior temporal regions, activation was delayed in response to the largest constituent structures, suggesting that nested linguistic structures take increasingly longer time to be computed and that these delays can be measured with fMRI.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.

              It is well known that real-time human language processing is highly incremental and context-driven, and that the strength of a comprehender's expectation for each word encountered is a key determinant of the difficulty of integrating that word into the preceding context. In reading, this differential difficulty is largely manifested in the amount of time taken to read each word. While numerous studies over the past thirty years have shown expectation-based effects on reading times driven by lexical, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and other information sources, there has been little progress in establishing the quantitative relationship between expectation (or prediction) and reading times. Here, by combining a state-of-the-art computational language model, two large behavioral data-sets, and non-parametric statistical techniques, we establish for the first time the quantitative form of this relationship, finding that it is logarithmic over six orders of magnitude in estimated predictability. This result is problematic for a number of established models of eye movement control in reading, but lends partial support to an optimal perceptual discrimination account of word recognition. We also present a novel model in which language processing is highly incremental well below the level of the individual word, and show that it predicts both the shape and time-course of this effect. At a more general level, this result provides challenges for both anticipatory processing and semantic integration accounts of lexical predictability effects. And finally, this result provides evidence that comprehenders are highly sensitive to relative differences in predictability - even for differences between highly unpredictable words - and thus helps bring theoretical unity to our understanding of the role of prediction at multiple levels of linguistic structure in real-time language comprehension. Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2017
                18 May 2017
                : 12
                : 5
                : e0177794
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                [2 ]Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                [3 ]Meertens Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Science and Arts, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [4 ]Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                University of Akron, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: RW SF AvdB.

                • Data curation: AL RW.

                • Formal analysis: AL.

                • Funding acquisition: RW AvdB.

                • Investigation: RW.

                • Methodology: AL RW SF AvdB.

                • Software: AL RW AvdB.

                • Supervision: RW SF AvdB.

                • Visualization: AL.

                • Writing – original draft: AL.

                • Writing – review & editing: AL RW SF AvdB.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3938-6687
                Article
                PONE-D-17-01999
                10.1371/journal.pone.0177794
                5436813
                28542396
                295ce438-b6a0-43a6-b1a0-09cd1028add2
                © 2017 Lopopolo et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 January 2017
                : 3 May 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 10, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003246, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek;
                Award ID: 024.001.006
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003246, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek;
                Award ID: 276-89-007
                Award Recipient :
                The work presented here was funded by Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Gravitation Grant 024.001.006 to the Language in Interaction Consortium and by NWO Vidi grant (NWO-Vidi 276-89-007).
                Categories
                Research Article
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Phonology
                Syntax
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Phonology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Language
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Speech
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Phonology
                Phonemes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Brain Mapping
                Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Imaging Techniques
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Radiology and Imaging
                Diagnostic Radiology
                Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Imaging Techniques
                Neuroimaging
                Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neuroimaging
                Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Neurolinguistics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neurolinguistics
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Probability Theory
                Stochastic Processes
                Custom metadata
                ***PA at accept: please ask AU if "Other" file called "Related study, data source" is meant to be pubbed. We have made available the whole 24-subject fMRI dataset and related scripts, data and meta-data on https://osf.io/75tx9/ (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/75TX9).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article