9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PRISM protocol: a randomised phase II trial of nivolumab in combination with alternatively scheduled ipilimumab in first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The combination of nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) targeted monoclonal antibody, with the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) targeted antibody, ipilimumab, represents a new standard of care in the first-line setting for patients with intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) based on recent phase III data. Combining ipilimumab with nivolumab increases rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicity compared with nivolumab alone, and the optimal scheduling of these agents when used together remains unknown. The aim of the PRISM study is to assess whether less frequent dosing of ipilimumab (12-weekly versus 3-weekly), in combination with nivolumab, is associated with a favourable toxicity profile without adversely impacting efficacy.

          Methods

          The PRISM trial is a UK-based, open label, multi-centre, phase II, randomised controlled trial. The trial population consists of patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC, and aims to recruit 189 participants. Participants will be randomised on a 2:1 basis in favour of a modified schedule of 4 doses of 12-weekly ipilimumab versus a standard schedule of 4 doses of 3-weekly ipilimumab, both in combination with standard nivolumab. The proportion of participants experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse reaction within 12 months forms the primary endpoint of the study, but with 12-month progression free survival a key secondary endpoint. The incidence of all adverse events, discontinuation rates, overall response rate, duration of response, overall survival rates and health related quality of life will also be analysed as secondary endpoints. In addition, the potential of circulating and tissue-based biomarkers as predictors of therapy response will be explored.

          Discussion

          The combination of nivolumab with ipilimumab is active in patients with mRCC. Modifying the frequency of ipilimumab dosing may mitigate toxicity rates and positively impact quality of life without compromising efficacy, a hypothesis being explored in other tumour types such as non-small cell lung cancer. The best way to give this combination to patients with mRCC must be similarly established.

          Trial registration

          PRISM is registered with ISRCTN (reference ISRCTN95351638, 19/12/2017).

          Trial status

          At the time of submission, PRISM is open to recruitment and data collection is ongoing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study.

          There are no robust data on prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -targeted therapy. Baseline characteristics and outcomes on 645 patients with anti-VEGF therapy-naïve metastatic RCC were collected from three US and four Canadian cancer centers. Cox proportional hazards regression, followed by bootstrap validation, was used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS. The median OS for the whole cohort was 22 months (95% CI, 20.2 to 26.5 months), and the median follow-up was 24.5 months. Overall, 396, 200, and 49 patients were treated with sunitinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab, respectively. Four of the five adverse prognostic factors according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were independent predictors of short survival: hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal (P < .0001), corrected calcium greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN; P = .0006), Karnofsky performance status less than 80% (P < .0001), and time from diagnosis to treatment of less than 1 year (P = .01). In addition, neutrophils greater than the ULN (P < .0001) and platelets greater than the ULN (P = .01) were independent adverse prognostic factors. Patients were segregated into three risk categories: the favorable-risk group (no prognostic factors; n = 133), in which median OS (mOS) was not reached and 2-year OS (2y OS) was 75%; the intermediate-risk group (one or two prognostic factors; n = 301), in which mOS was 27 months and 2y OS was 53%; and the poor-risk group (three to six prognostic factors; n = 152), in which mOS was 8.8 months and 2y OS was 7% (log-rank P < .0001). The C-index was 0.73. This model validates components of the MSKCC model with the addition of platelet and neutrophil counts and can be incorporated into patient care and into clinical trials that use VEGF-targeted agents.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Prognostic Model for Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results from the International Kidney Cancer Working Group

            Purpose: To develop a single validated model for survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) using a comprehensive international database. Experimental Design: A comprehensive database of 3,748 patients including previously reported clinical prognostic factors was established by pooling patient-level data from clinical trials. Following quality control and standardization, descriptive statistics were generated. Univariate analyses were conducted using proportional hazards models. Multivariable analysis using a log–logistic model stratified by center and multivariable fractional polynomials was conducted to identify independent predictors of survival. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation methods. Three risk groups were formed using the 25th and 75th percentiles of the resulting prognostic index. The model was validated using an independent data set of 645 patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Results: Median survival in the favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups was 26.9 months, 11.5 months, and 4.2 months, respectively. Factors contributing to the prognostic index included treatment, performance status, number of metastatic sites, time from diagnosis to treatment, and pretreatment hemoglobin, white blood count, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, and serum calcium. The model showed good concordance when tested among patients treated with TKI therapy (C statistic = 0.741, 95% CI: 0.714–0.768). Conclusions: Nine clinical factors can be used to model survival in mRCC and form distinct prognostic groups. The model shows utility among patients treated in the TKI era. Clin Cancer Res; 17(16); 5443–50. ©2011 AACR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib or interferon alfa: results from a phase III randomized trial.

              In an international, randomized phase III trial, sunitinib demonstrated statistically significant efficacy over interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) (progression-free survival time, 11 v 5 months, respectively; P < .001; objective response rate, 31% v 6%, respectively; P < .001). We report health-related quality-of-life (QOL) results from this trial. Seven hundred fifty mRCC patients were randomly assigned to sunitinib (6-week cycles: 50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off) or IFN-alpha (9 million units subcutaneous injections, three times weekly). QOL measures included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-15 item (FKSI-15), and the EuroQoL-5D's utility score (EQ-5D Index) and its visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). The primary QOL end point was the FKSI Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale. Higher scores indicated better outcomes (better QOL or fewer symptoms). Data were analyzed for the intent-to-treat population using mixed-effects models, supplemented with pattern-mixture models. Patients receiving sunitinib reported higher FKSI-15 and FKSI-DRS scores at each cycle than those receiving IFN-alpha, with a significant difference in the overall least squares means (3.27 and 1.98, respectively; P < .0001). Similarly, differences in least squares means for FACT-G (and all subscales), EQ-5D Index, and EQ-VAS were all significantly favorable for sunitinib (P < .01). Per pre-established thresholds, between-treatment differences in the mean scores were clinically meaningful after cycle 4 for FKSI-DRS and at all assessments for FKSI-15, FACT-G, and the FACT-G functional well-being subscale. Sunitinib provides superior QOL compared with IFN-alpha in mRCC patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                H.L.Buckley@leeds.ac.uk
                F.J.Collinson@leeds.ac.uk
                G.Ainsworth@leeds.ac.uk
                H.Poad@leeds.ac.uk
                L.M.Flanagan@leeds.ac.uk
                E.Katona@leeds.ac.uk
                H.C.Howard@leeds.ac.uk
                g.a.murden@leeds.ac.uk
                r.banks@leeds.ac.uk
                j.c.brown@leeds.ac.uk
                G.Velikova@leeds.ac.uk
                Tom.Waddell@christie.nhs.uk
                kate.fife@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
                nathan.pd@gmail.com
                James.Larkin@rmh.nhs.uk
                Thomas.Powles@bartshealth.nhs.uk
                S.Brown@leeds.ac.uk
                +44 113 2067680 , N.Vasudev@leeds.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2407
                14 November 2019
                14 November 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 1102
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8403, GRID grid.9909.9, Clinical Trials Research Unit, , University of Leeds, ; Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.443984.6, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, , St. James’s University Hospital, ; Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8403, GRID grid.9909.9, University of Leeds, ; Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0399 8363, GRID grid.415720.5, Department of Medical Oncology, , Christie Hospital, ; Manchester, M20 4BX UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0622 5016, GRID grid.120073.7, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, ; Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0400 1422, GRID grid.477623.3, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, ; Middlesex, HA6 2RN UK
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0417 0461, GRID grid.424926.f, Royal Marsden Hospital, ; London, SW3 6JJ UK
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 1133, GRID grid.4868.2, Barts Cancer Institute, ; London, EC1M 6BQ UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8470-7481
                Article
                6273
                10.1186/s12885-019-6273-1
                6854710
                31727024
                29750edb-5618-4b5b-b652-322a6065cc88
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 August 2019
                : 18 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Bristol-Myers Squibb
                Award ID: CA209-814
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                renal cancer,nivolumab,ipilimumab,schedule,safety,efficacy,randomised,immunotherapy,trial
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                renal cancer, nivolumab, ipilimumab, schedule, safety, efficacy, randomised, immunotherapy, trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article