9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Altered chromosomal topology drives oncogenic programs in SDH-deficient GISTs

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Epigenetic aberrations are widespread in cancer, yet the underlying mechanisms and causality remain poorly understood 1- 3 . A subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) lack canonical kinase mutations but instead have succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficiency and global DNA hyper-methylation 4, 5 . Here we associate this hyper-methylation with changes in genome topology that activate oncogenic programs. To investigate epigenetic alterations systematically, we mapped DNA methylation, CTCF insulators, enhancers, and chromosome topology in KIT-mutant, PDGFRA-mutant, and SDH-deficient GISTs. Although these respective subtypes shared similar enhancer landscapes, we identified hundreds of putative insulators where DNA methylation replaced CTCF binding in SDH-deficient GISTs. We focused on a disrupted insulator that normally partitions a core GIST super-enhancer from the FGF4 oncogene. Recurrent loss of this insulator alters locus topology in SDH-deficient GISTs, allowing aberrant physical interaction between enhancer and oncogene. CRISPR-mediated excision of the corresponding CTCF motifs in an SDH-intact GIST model disrupted the boundary and strongly up-regulated FGF4 expression. We also identified a second recurrent insulator loss event near the KIT oncogene, which is also highly expressed across SDH-deficient GISTs. Finally, we established a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) from an SDH-deficient GIST that faithfully maintains the epigenetics of the parental tumor, including hyper-methylation and insulator defects. This PDX model is highly sensitive to FGF receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, and more so to combined FGFR and KIT inhibition, validating the functional significance of the underlying epigenetic lesions. Our study reveals how epigenetic alterations can drive oncogenic programs in the absence of canonical kinase mutations, with implications for mechanistic targeting of aberrant pathways in cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The protein kinase complement of the human genome.

          G. Manning (2002)
          We have catalogued the protein kinase complement of the human genome (the "kinome") using public and proprietary genomic, complementary DNA, and expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences. This provides a starting point for comprehensive analysis of protein phosphorylation in normal and disease states, as well as a detailed view of the current state of human genome analysis through a focus on one large gene family. We identify 518 putative protein kinase genes, of which 71 have not previously been reported or described as kinases, and we extend or correct the protein sequences of 56 more kinases. New genes include members of well-studied families as well as previously unidentified families, some of which are conserved in model organisms. Classification and comparison with model organism kinomes identified orthologous groups and highlighted expansions specific to human and other lineages. We also identified 106 protein kinase pseudogenes. Chromosomal mapping revealed several small clusters of kinase genes and revealed that 244 kinases map to disease loci or cancer amplicons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Editing DNA Methylation in the Mammalian Genome.

            Mammalian DNA methylation is a critical epigenetic mechanism orchestrating gene expression networks in many biological processes. However, investigation of the functions of specific methylation events remains challenging. Here, we demonstrate that fusion of Tet1 or Dnmt3a with a catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) enables targeted DNA methylation editing. Targeting of the dCas9-Tet1 or -Dnmt3a fusion protein to methylated or unmethylated promoter sequences caused activation or silencing, respectively, of an endogenous reporter. Targeted demethylation of the BDNF promoter IV or the MyoD distal enhancer by dCas9-Tet1 induced BDNF expression in post-mitotic neurons or activated MyoD facilitating reprogramming of fibroblasts into myoblasts, respectively. Targeted de novo methylation of a CTCF loop anchor site by dCas9-Dnmt3a blocked CTCF binding and interfered with DNA looping, causing altered gene expression in the neighboring loop. Finally, we show that these tools can edit DNA methylation in mice, demonstrating their wide utility for functional studies of epigenetic regulation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes.

              The architecture of interphase chromosomes is important for the regulation of gene expression and genome maintenance. Chromosomes are linearly segmented into hundreds of domains with different protein compositions. Furthermore, the spatial organization of chromosomes is nonrandom and is characterized by many local and long-range contacts among genes and other sequence elements. A variety of genome-wide mapping techniques have made it possible to chart these properties at high resolution. Combined with microscopy and computational modeling, the results begin to yield a more coherent picture that integrates linear and three-dimensional (3D) views of chromosome organization in relation to gene regulation and other nuclear functions. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                12 September 2019
                16 October 2019
                November 2019
                16 April 2020
                : 575
                : 7781
                : 229-233
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
                [2 ]Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
                [3 ]Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
                [4 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts 02215 USA.
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
                [6 ]Experimental Therapeutics Core, Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
                [7 ]Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
                [8 ]Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
                [9 ]Ludwig Center at Harvard, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 USA
                [10 ]Current Address: The Lautenberg Center for Immunology and Cancer Research, IMRIC, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 9112102, Israel.
                Author notes

                Author contributions Conception and experimental design: W.A.F., Y.D., S.E.J., M.L.H., E.T.S., G.D.D., and B.E.B. Methodology and data acquisition: W.A.F., Y.D., S.E.J., M.L.H., D.R.T., E.H., S.J.S., N.M.J., C.P.R., B.K.E., P.C.G., J.L.H., E.T.S., G.D.D., and B.E.B. Analysis and interpretation of data: W.A.F., Y.D., M.L.H., S.J.S., N.M.J., G.D.D., and B.E.B. Manuscript writing and revision: W.A.F., Y.D., and B.E.B.

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                NIHMS1539624
                10.1038/s41586-019-1668-3
                6913936
                31666694
                29882f6b-f354-40d2-aae6-9a9b9edd805d

                Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article