8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Do we need to worry about mycophenolate overdose?

      ,
      Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
      Informa Healthcare

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mycophenolate, clinical pharmacokinetics, formulations, and methods for assessing drug exposure.

          This article summarizes part of a consensus meeting about mycophenolate (MPA) therapeutic drug monitoring held in Rome under the auspices of The Transplantation Society in November 2008 (Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:341-358). This part of the meeting focused on the clinical pharmacokinetics of MPA and included discussion on how to measure MPA (active drug) exposure and the differences between the currently available formulations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolates in kidney transplantation: report of The Transplantation Society consensus meeting.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil are influenced by concomitant immunosuppression.

              The recommended dosage for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with cyclosporin (CyA) for pediatric kidney transplant recipients is 600 mg/m(2) twice daily (b.i.d.). We recently published pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of MMF in combination with tacrolimus (FK506): in order to keep the mycophenolic acid (MPA) pre-dose trough concentration between 2 and 5 microg/ml and to avoid side effects, mean MMF doses were reduced to 300 mg/m(2) b.i.d. In order to investigate whether this striking difference was due to alterations of MPA clearance by CyA or FK506, we analyzed PK profiles from 13 patients who received MMF without CyA or FK506, and compared these data with 14 patients who received a combination of MMF and FK506 and 15 patients who received MMF and CyA. Mean area under the curve (AUC) in all PK profiles was 61.9+/-23.8 microgxh/ml. Although the AUCs did not differ between the groups, the dose per square meter was significantly lower in patients receiving concomitant FK506 compared with CyA, and the dose-normalized AUC was significantly higher. The MMF doses were 1,158+/-301 mg/m(2) per day in the CyA group, 555+/-289 mg/m(2) per day in the tacrolimus group, and 866+/-401 mg/m(2) per day in the group without concomitant calcineurin inhibitor treatment. The apparent clearance of MPA is reduced in combination with tacrolimus. The reason for this remains unknown. There was a trend towards lower dose-normalized AUCs in the CyA group compared with the group without calcineurin inhibitor treatment. We conclude that concomitant medication alters the clearance of MPA. It is noteworthy that there was substantial interindividual variation, despite the rather marked differences between the groups, and therefore we recommend starting MMF in combination with CyA at a dose of 600 mg/m(2) b.i.d., in combination with tacrolimus at a dose of 300 mg/m(2) b.i.d., and without a calcineurin inhibitor at a dose of 500 mg/m(2) b.i.d., and adjusting doses using therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
                Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
                Informa Healthcare
                1474-0338
                1744-764X
                April 2014
                April 2014
                : 13
                : 5
                : 521-524
                Article
                10.1517/14740338.2014.905540
                24684200
                2992e236-8973-40c5-8fe2-b83934e42eeb
                © 2014
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article